Preview

interracial relationships

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2169 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
interracial relationships
We are Created Equal, Why Not Interracial Relationships?

With the growing liberalization of the United States, the concept of an interracial relationship in this nation has evolved from a dream to a common reality. The beginning of this evolution was marked by a historic event in the famous case of Loving V. Virginia in 1967 (Newbeck 1) which set a legal precedent for interracial marriage. There has been an impressive increase in interracial relationships since this important case. The acceptance of interracial relationships has grown nation-wide over the years, but setbacks and negativity toward the concept still exist. Despite the mild social pressure surrounding this stigma, interracial relationships create a well-rounded society by eliminating stereotypes and social segregation. However, interracial relationships face some barriers that most people do not have because they come from the same race or culture. The Loving V. Virginia case is the historical case involving the legalization of interracial relationships nation-wide. It all began in June of 1958 when Mildred Jeter Loving, an African-American woman, and Richard Perry Loving, who was white, escaped from Virginia to Washington D.C. to exchange marital vows (Newbeck 3). Five weeks after their wedding, they were awakened in the middle of the night by police and arrested for violating Virginia’s Racial Integrity Act of 1924, by living in Virginia as husband and wife. On January 6, 1959, after pleading guilty to the charge against them, they were sentenced to one year in jail (Newbeck 24). The sentence was suspended for 25 years; however, Judge Leon Brazile eliminated their one-year sentencing "on the condition that the Lovings leave the State and not return to Virginia together for 25 years" (Newbeck 25). The Lovings agreed to the offer and left Virginia to live in Washington D.C. After four years went, Mildred missed her family in Virginia and was unhappy with the court’s decision. In 1963, the Lovings

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Mildred Jeter, an African-American woman, and Richard Loving, a white man, went to Washington, D.C, to get married and avoid Virginia’s interracial marriage ban. When they returned to Virginia not long after, the Lovings were arrested under the charges of violating Virginia’s interracial marriage ban.…

    • 189 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Loving v Virginia a married couple from Washington D.C. moved to Virginia where they were then subject to Virginia’s anti-miscegenation statute. Anti-miscegenation laws prohibit the marrying of different races with another. In Virginia, this statute prohibited the marriage between whites and any other race. Richard Loving, a white man, and Mildred Jeter, a black woman, were married in Washington D.C. They then moved to the state of Virginia where they faced criminal charges. Both of them pled guilty and were sentenced to one year imprisonment but the sentence would be waved for 25 years if they moved out of state and didn’t return.…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This would be a beautiful love story except for this couple was an interracial one and their home state of Virginia did not condone marriages between Caucasians and African-Americans. Yes, it was 1958 but the law had been in place since 1924. It didn’t matter that the couple, Mr. Richard Loving and Miss. Mildred Jeter, were legally married in Washington, DC. They returned eager to begin their life as one but was jailed. The state of Virginia upheld their law and the Lovings were sentenced to a years imprisonment. The nice judge suspended their time but they had to agree to leave Virginia and not return for 25 years. The Lovings family returned to Washington, DC but decided to visit family in Virginia. During this visit they were again arrested. During this time Mrs. Loving sought out assistance from the Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy.…

    • 564 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Moran, Rachel F. Interracial Intimacy: The Regulation of Race and Romance. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2001.…

    • 3133 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Plaintiffs in Loving v. Virginia were Richard and Mildred Loving, who were represented by the ACLU in the Supreme Court. The Plaintiff argued the prohibition of interracial marriage was unconstitutional and anti-miscegenation laws violated the Equal Protection Clause and Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The Fourteenth Amendment explains, “No State shall deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of the law.” As declared by the Constitution and Maynard v. Hill case, marriage is a civil right for citizens of the United States and the decision of whether one decides to marry a colored person or not cannot be infringed by any state. Denying anyone their given right to marry without due process of the…

    • 274 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pa250 Unit 1

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Loving v. Virginia (388 US 1, 1967) was a landmark case, dealing with inter-racial marriage, which went all the way to the US Supreme Court. The plaintiffs, Mildred and Richard Loving, an inter-racial couple, who were residents of Virginia, where at the time it was illegal for people of different races to be married. They went to Washington D.C. in June of 1958 to get married, and returned back to live a married couple in Virginia. Upon their return to Caroline County, Virginia they were charged with violating the law. The couple was charged when police invaded their home in the middle of the night, hoping to witness the Loving’s involved in a sexual act which was also a crime at the time in Virginia. When Mrs. Loving showed the police the marriage certificate, the police charged the couple with violating Virginia § 20-50 which, “prohibited interracial couples from being married out of state and then returning to Virginia.” As well as, Virginia § 20-59 that made “miscegenation” a felony. Black’s Law defines miscegenation as, “A marriage between persons of different races, formally considered illegal in some jurisdictions. In 1967, the US Supreme Court held that laws banning…

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Truman Capote Quotes

    • 547 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “On June 12, 1967, the Supreme Court handed down a landmark decision that allowed for interracial couples to marry in every state in America” (Loving vs. Virginia). Before this liberating day, people were restrained from freely marrying those outside of their nationality, regardless of their genuine love for their partner. History helps demonstrate the beauty of boundless love. Interracial marriages today illustrate the blindness of affection people posses toward others. When all people realize that love cannot be confined, changes occur that set free the very nature of our true…

    • 547 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    America’s first biracial child was born in 1620 before anti miscegenation laws were created to prevent African Americans from getting romantically involved with Whites. Negative attitudes towards interracial relationships were fueled by racial discrimination and the devotion to keep each race pure. In today's evolving society interracial relationships are still discouraged, especially between Whites and Blacks (Childs, 2005) due to parental approval and racism. Interracial unions are believed to be evidence of a cultural development resulting from America’s practices of racial boundaries in social interaction (King & Bratter, 2007). In today’s society it is influential to increase contact amongst different races and cultures…

    • 2051 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    On January 6, 1956 the Loving’s pled guilty to “cohabiting as man and wife, against the peace and dignity of the commonwealth.” That’s when the couple was sentenced to a year in prison, with the sentenced suspended if the couple were to leave Virginia and not to return to the state at the same time. Mildred, frustrated, that her and her husband could not live together decided to write Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy. Kennedy sent her to the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU). The ACLU assigned Bernard Cohen and Philip Hirschkop to motion on behalf of the Lovings in the Virginia Caroline County Court.…

    • 1112 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Loving Vs Virginia Essay

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In June of 1958, Mildred Jeter and Richard Loving married in the District of Columbia. They were residents of Virginia but due to Virginia’s laws they weren’t able to marry within their state. The state of Virginia prevented marriages based on racial classification. After the couple married they returned to their home state in Caroline County where they were then charged for violating Virginia’s ban on interracial marriages. The Loving’s went to court and was sentenced to a year in jail. However, the judge suspended the trial for twenty-five years on the condition that the Loving’s wouldn’t return to Virginia for those twenty-five years.…

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Loving v. Virginia case wasn’t ever just a political case. It was a social class segregation that began from early on that people made law. Jim Crow Laws and many other laws, including one denying interracial relationships, was a way of suppressing a certain group of people from living the same as everyone else. This fight was one for equality and love, and those two things have been and will forever have relevance until there is total equality for all people. They had their “happy ending” where they were able to be together without…

    • 636 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Loving V. Virginia

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Loving v. Virginia tells me in this case that the Constitution of the United States then were unfair and unjust to the Loving Family. Here we have two people of different race, obviously in love and married. Although the state of Virginia had its own objective concerning interracial marriages, I feel that our Constitution should have enforced what laws were emplaced within The Constitution of the United States. That’s why they were written to protect and to keep good law and order.…

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Though slavery was abolished and the “separate but equal” clause was gone, racism was still an active issue around the 1960s. Many states prohibited marriage between black and white men and women. However, in 1967 the Supreme Court ruled that interracial marriages are constitutional in the case of Loving v. Virginia. While interracial marriages did not become common for several years following, this case began the trend that only continued to increase afterwards. Today, this type of marriage is accepted by majority of Americans; however, a large percentage of people still disagree with the practice. It has become more complicated since 1960 simply because there was a scarce amount of interracial couples during that time. Now, there is more awareness, as well as more attention surrounding the topic. While the allowance of interracial marriage is not a negative matter, it was not as complicated when it was not permitted because it was discussed…

    • 1090 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Loving Vs Virginia

    • 1779 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Virginia: The Case Over Interracial Marriage”). In the state of Virginia, the couple was sent to prison because they violated the miscegenation laws. One late night in their Virginia home, police broke into their house. Later, they were brought to prison.The authorities educated them about the laws of Virginia. The statement shows what happened to the Lovings. “At the October Term, 1958, of the Circuit Court of Caroline County, a grand jury issued an indictment charging the Lovings with violating Virginia's ban on interracial marriages” (“Loving v. Virginia LII”). Due to the fact they were charged guilty, the Lovings made the decision to take their case to court. On April 10, 1967, the angry couple explained that the law was a violation of their privacy and well-being. The following shows the Loving’s reason to get help. “These Lovings claimed that the state law violated their 14th Amendment rights to pursuit life, liberty and happiness” (“Loving v Virginia” laws.com). In this ruling,the judge was Leon. M Bazile. Immediately, he made his final decision about the conflict. He believed that people of different ethnicities were not supposed to love each other. Leon Bazile quoted, "Almighty God created the races white, black, yellow, Malay and red, and he placed them on separate continents ... The fact that he separated the races shows that he did not intend for the races…

    • 1779 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Americans have over come a lot in history, we have been through many wars and lost many lives but one thing we as Americans have not been able to get over is racism. Racism has played a big role in our history. Abraham Lincoln may have abolished slavery which in fact is a form of racism but he didn't get ride of the fact that there will always be a wall built up between many whites and African Americans. Many African Americans have led rallies over these last hundred years trying to fight racism, while some have made a dent in this social disagreement even if it wasn't long term and others just made matters worse. Over time Americans have developed many forms of racism such as: interracial relationships,…

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays