Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Loving V. Virginia

Good Essays
533 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Loving V. Virginia
Loving v. Virginia
Loving v. Virginia tells me in this case that the Constitution of the United States then were unfair and unjust to the Loving Family. Here we have two people of different race, obviously in love and married. Although the state of Virginia had its own objective concerning interracial marriages, I feel that our Constitution should have enforced what laws were emplaced within The Constitution of the United States. That’s why they were written to protect and to keep good law and order. According to the Equal Protection Clause govern by The Fourteenth Amendment; no one will be deprived of life, liberty or prosperity. Legislature and Judges were suppose to uphold the Constitution of the United States, but did not. Even after going through protocol by appealing to the highest court of appeals, the Loving family sentence remained due to the state of Virginia’s objective concerning interracial marriages. As far as the role of the Supreme Court ensuring that the Loving rights were upheld, in my opinion, they did the bare minimal. Even with The Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment there for the people, the legal system failed to uphold the law of the land. They deprived the Loving to marry who their hearts desires in the pursuit of happiness. I am proud to say; today we are not being deprived of our rights as the Loving family has been. Our Constitutional rights are being upheld within the boundaries set forth even with interracial marriages still being looked down on.

After ready the different blogs posted, every case has been about racism or discrimination in some way shape or form. I also noticed that everyone has realized how our judicial system has evolved over time. As the Judicial system has evolved and really focused on checks and balances fare and impartial treatment towards all is not a question. It is not even an option or something in my opinion will ever be discussed or thought of again as far as justice being served. Our nation has really grown and come along way within the last century.
The role of the Supreme Court is instrumental just because, we are not any longer ignorant to our rights knowing with the Supreme Court being here for us and will without a doubt uphold what The Constitution of the United States says. Today justice will be served without question. Our nation today is held to a standard that there is not a choice but to be far and impartial regardless of ethnicity, race or gender.
In the Loving v. Virginia, which a good number of people do not realize, that case is one of the reasons why we are able to marry who we want even though we all don’t agree. For an example, same sex marriages. The Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment says we can marry who we want as long as two people are pursuing happiness. According to the Fourteenth Amendment, it okay and goes against what the Bible tells us about same sex marriages. We are really free racism and discrimination, when we go against what The Good Book says when it comes to our Constitutional Rights.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    In 1963, the Lovings filed a motion in State Trail court on the grounds on Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment were violated.…

    • 109 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    As the case of Garden State Equality vs. Dow unravels into the Supreme Court hearings, there will be an indefinite variety of opinions and disputes of minds. There is room for controversy and disputes will arise. There are miss-interpretations and quotes that government officials and citizens against civil union rights have expressed and demonstrated about same-sex couples and their right to marry. This is an example of an interpretation given to describe differences in marital relationships by one of the Opinions of the Justices to the Senate, 440 Mass. at 1207, it states, “The dissimilitude between the terms “civil marriage” and “civil union” is not innocuous; it is a considered choice of…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stutzman Case Summary

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages

    “This case is about crushing dissent. In a free America, people with differing beliefs must have room to coexist,” ADF’s senior counsel Kristen Waggoner said in a statement. “It’s wrong for the state to force any citizen to support a particular view about marriage or anything else against their will. Freedom of speech and religion aren’t subject to the whim of a majority; they are constitutional guarantees.”…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Though many know of the court case, not all people know the history of it. The part that many know is that the people were gay, lesbian, and so on, and most people also know that they were fighting for the right to marry. What too many people do not know is that even though court Justices were against it, the majority did not care since it did not affect them. Justice Scalia said the following in his statement, “The substance of today’s decree is not of immense personal importance to me.” Since in many states, previous to the law passing, barely anyone who was same-sex could marry their spouse.Though this privilege was granted to opposite-sex spouses, along with insured plans, medical plans, and many other privileges. When the law was passed, same-sex couples would have the same privileges. “Insured plans in every state will require to offer coverage to same-sex spouses to the extent such plans cover opposite-sex…

    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pa250 Unit 1

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Loving v. Virginia (388 US 1, 1967) was a landmark case, dealing with inter-racial marriage, which went all the way to the US Supreme Court. The plaintiffs, Mildred and Richard Loving, an inter-racial couple, who were residents of Virginia, where at the time it was illegal for people of different races to be married. They went to Washington D.C. in June of 1958 to get married, and returned back to live a married couple in Virginia. Upon their return to Caroline County, Virginia they were charged with violating the law. The couple was charged when police invaded their home in the middle of the night, hoping to witness the Loving’s involved in a sexual act which was also a crime at the time in Virginia. When Mrs. Loving showed the police the marriage certificate, the police charged the couple with violating Virginia § 20-50 which, “prohibited interracial couples from being married out of state and then returning to Virginia.” As well as, Virginia § 20-59 that made “miscegenation” a felony. Black’s Law defines miscegenation as, “A marriage between persons of different races, formally considered illegal in some jurisdictions. In 1967, the US Supreme Court held that laws banning…

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Loving Vs Virginia Essay

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The judge of the Loving’s trial stated “Almighty God created the races white, black, malay and red, and he placed them on separate continents. and but for the interference with his arrangement, there would be no cause for such marriage. The fact that he separated the races shows that he did not intend for the races to mix.” The state of Virginia, the plaintiff, makes the argument that couples of different race should not be married for it’s not what God intended. On the other side, the defendant, the Loving’s, believe the state didn’t have the right to charge them and the state was…

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Supreme Court found "separate but equal" unconstitutional reflects the living view of the Constitutional.…

    • 203 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    7. In Loving v. Virginia, the United States Supreme Court was asked to rule on a case about a. homosexual marriage c. child marriage b. interracial marriage d. arranged marriage…

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Adocates throughout the world came together with one voice to fight for marital rights for same sex couples. According to an article in the Huffington Post, Liebelson and Terkel, reports that the U.S. Supreme Court ruled 5-4 that it is legal for all Americans, no matter their gender or sexual orienation, to marry the people they love. The decision is a historic victory of gay rights activitsts who have fought for years in the lower courts. Thirty-seven states and the District of Columbia already recognize marriage equality. The remaining 13 states ban these unions, even as public support have reached record levels nationwide. The justices found that, under the 4th Amendment, states must issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples and recognize same-sex unions that have been legally performed in other states. Justice Anthony Kennedy delivered the majority opinion and was joined by Justices Ruth BaderGinsburg, Elena Kagan, Stephen Breyer and Sonai Sotomayor. In a rare move, the four dissenting justices each wrote an opinion (Dana Liebelson and Amanda Terkel,…

    • 1551 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    This law specified that a legal marriage be defined to be between a man and a woman. By declaring this law the Federal Government denied same-sex couple benefits that afforded married people such as family and medical leave, pooling economic resources without unfair taxation, military benefits, and Social Security survivor benefits. I had come to terms with my own sexual orientation and now the country I was born in was creating legal restrictions against me and my gay brothers and…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Obergefell Case Summary

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Obergefell decision is a landmark case that deals with a much greater debate than just that of the legality of same-sex marriage. The majority opinion of the court ruled in favor of the guaranteed right to marriage in every U.S. state regardless of the sex of the individuals involved. While the advancement of liberal social rights is evident in this opinion, the ruling, perhaps more importantly, confronts the struggle between the dissenting views of the nature of Constitutional revision. Through the Obergefell majority opinion and Scalia’s dissent, we see a profound and necessary debate regarding how to treat our nation’s founding document moving forward.…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Homo Rights

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages

    As polls have shown, more and more Americans are favoring marriage equality (Kludt). One American is steadily trying to add to the equal rights amendment, “Equality of Rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or any state on account of sex” (Paul). When we became the United States of America we came here as equal humans and now that we have grown we are becoming more and more unequal. “Any law that specifically bans same-sex marriage is a violation of the Fourteenth Amendment” (Weiss).…

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Organic Food

    • 659 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The court found that restricting marriage to same-sex couples violates the state constitution. In its decision, the court cited only APA's brief - one out of the 45 submitted. APA offered rigorous psychological evidence emphasizing the major impact stigma has on well-being, the benefits of marriage, and the lack of difference between lesbian and gay parents and heterosexual parents.…

    • 659 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    homosexual

    • 1155 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Every people has same right to chose their spouse. The US Supreme Court ruled in 1974’s Cleveland Board of Education v. LaFleur that the "freedom of personal choice in matters of marriage and family life is one of the liberties protected by the Due Process Clause.” US District Judge Vaughn Walker wrote on Aug. 4, 2010 that Prop. 8 in California banning gay marriage was "unconstitutional under both the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses."…

    • 1155 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Love Knows No Gender

    • 1346 Words
    • 6 Pages

    All people have the right to make their own choices on who they love, right? Wrong. Think about all of the people who are homosexual. There are laws prohibiting them, telling them that they can’t marry the person thy love because of their sexual. Orientation. They can be together, but they cannot make it official because of a law. That would be like telling heterosexual people that they can’t marry the person they love for some reason. It’s a violation of the Constitution. The Constitution states that people have the freedom of choice. How is this being honored when gay couples cannot make the choice to marry who they wish to marry?…

    • 1346 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays