Preview

Pa250 Unit 1

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
783 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Pa250 Unit 1
One of the basic rights we hold sacred in this country is the freedom to marry whomever we choose. While that seems like a given in the US, because we don’t have the strict class hierarchy of Europe, or the arranged unions found in certain Eastern and African cultures that define who marries whom. We have had, and still do for that matter, rigid restrictions on marriage, when they seem counter-intuitive to social mores. When social feelings begin to shift towards a more progressive outlook, challenges to the status quo are bound to occur, especially when the emotionally charged aspect of marriage is involved. Two perfect examples are the cases of Loving v. Virginia 388 US 1, 87 S Ct1817(1967), and Goodridge v. Department of Public Health 440 Mass 309, 798 NE 2d 941(Mass.2003).
Loving v. Virginia (388 US 1, 1967) was a landmark case, dealing with inter-racial marriage, which went all the way to the US Supreme Court. The plaintiffs, Mildred and Richard Loving, an inter-racial couple, who were residents of Virginia, where at the time it was illegal for people of different races to be married. They went to Washington D.C. in June of 1958 to get married, and returned back to live a married couple in Virginia. Upon their return to Caroline County, Virginia they were charged with violating the law. The couple was charged when police invaded their home in the middle of the night, hoping to witness the Loving’s involved in a sexual act which was also a crime at the time in Virginia. When Mrs. Loving showed the police the marriage certificate, the police charged the couple with violating Virginia § 20-50 which, “prohibited interracial couples from being married out of state and then returning to Virginia.” As well as, Virginia § 20-59 that made “miscegenation” a felony. Black’s Law defines miscegenation as, “A marriage between persons of different races, formally considered illegal in some jurisdictions. In 1967, the US Supreme Court held that laws banning



References: Loving v Virginia 388 US 1, 87 S Ct 1817(1967) 18 L. Ed. 2d 1010 US Lexis 1082 Goodridge v Department of Public Health 440 Mass. 309, 798 NE 2d 941 (Mass. 2003)

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Best Essays

    An Argument for Gay Marriage

    • 4293 Words
    • 18 Pages

    Civil marriage is at once a deeply personal commitment to another human being and a highly public celebration of the ideals of mutuality, companionship, intimacy, fidelity, and family. ‘It is an association that promotes a way of life, not causes; a harmony in living, not political faiths; a bilateral loyalty, not commercial or social projects. ' (Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly, 2003, para. 34)…

    • 4293 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Loving Case Summary

    • 274 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Loving case was based off of Richard and Mildred Loving’s marriage. Richard Perry Loving, a white construction worker, was born on October 29, 1933 in Central Point, Caroline County. Mildred Dolores Jeter, a mixed African American and Indian woman, was born on July 22, 1939 who was also born in Central Point, Caroline County. In the state of Virginia, the location in which they both had lived, there was a law called the Racial Integrity Act (“American...”). The Act restricted anyone of the opposite race to marry one another. According to Phyl Newbeck and Brendan Wolfe, Mildred and Richard when out of state to Washington D.C. to escape the marital restrictions back in Virginia. They were legally married on June 2, 1958. The couple lived…

    • 274 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    References: Gostin, Lawrence O. & Hodge, James G. Oregon Public Health Law Review. 2000. Georgetown University Law Center. Retrieved May 1, 2011…

    • 850 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    What Is a Civil Union

    • 356 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The authors, Jess Henig and Lori Robertson, who wrote the essay “What is a Civil Union?” present three differences between civil unions and marriages as the rights to federal benefits, portability of civil unions, and terminology of marriage. Henig and Robertson introduce the essay with how state and federal laws regarding gay marriage differ in that states allowing civil unions extend state benefits to same-sex married couples however, The Defense of Marriage Act states that for all legal purposes marriage is a union between one man and one woman therefore, federal marriage benefits are not extended to same-sex married couples. States with legalized civil unions including Connecticut, New Hampshire, New Jersey, and Vermont allow same-sex married couples state benefits. The authors go on to describe the differences of state and federal benefits. These include that same-sex married couples are allowed to file a joint state tax return, but must file separate federal tax returns claiming themselves as single. Additionally, if one spouse works for a company whose health care is governed by the state laws that coverage is extended to the spouse, however if the company if governed by federal laws then it is up to the employer if they will extend health coverage to the same-sex spouse. In conclusion, if a spouse were to die, the survivor would have the right to Social Security payments based on the earnings of the married couple. Moving into the middle of the essay, the authors inform us that New Jersey is the only state that allows portability of civil unions meaning that the same-sex partnership is transferable to another civil union state. The controversial issues of the traditional views of marriage conclude the essay with an argument from adversaries including Jenny Tyree with Focus on the Family, expressing that same-sex marriage discourages the traditional views of marriage as man, women, and children.…

    • 356 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Cited: Eskridge, William W Jr. and Darren R Spedale. Gay Marriage: For Better or For Worse. New…

    • 1276 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Same Sex Marriage

    • 1185 Words
    • 5 Pages

    "Marriage is a coming together for better or for worse, hopefully enduring, and intimate to the degree of being sacred. It is an association that promotes a way of life, not causes; a harmony in living, not political faiths; a bilateral loyalty, not commercial or social projects.” (U.S. Supreme Court). Marriage has been defined as a religious & legal commitment between a man and woman, as well as an expression of love. Homosexuals have not been allowed to partake in these commitments and the rising support for same sex marriage is becoming more of an issue for the government and voters. There are those that are against same sex marriage, who believe that marriage should be strictly between a man and a woman (Barber), and then there are those who believe that it is up to the individual on whom they want to marry (Quindlen). Despite the complexities surrounding the issue of gay marriage and the expansive argument on either side authors Anna Quindlen and La Shawn Barber present extremely simplistic yet opposing views on same sex marriage.…

    • 1185 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Writing Project three

    • 1642 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The legalization of same-sex marriage is fought strongly by both sides. Those against same-sex marriages fear legalizing them would diminish traditional marriages, along with having other concerns. The main view of those for same-sex marriage legalization is that they see it as a right to gays and lesbians. The question is which side is right? Would the legalization of same-sex marriages take away from traditional marriages or is it a right not being honored? The question of same-sex marriage brings with it the question why. Is it important for same-sex marriages to be legalized considering that same-sex couples can live in cohabitation even in the states where same-sex marriages are illegal? These are a few of the age old questions pertaining to the issue of same-sex marriage legalization. While many American’s view on marriage is that they are between a man and a woman, there are still several who believe same-sex marriages should be legalized.…

    • 1642 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The marriage-rights movement headed by gay rights activists has been a relevant issue on the American socio-political docket since 1970 following the Stonewall riots in New York City, New York in June of 1969. The riots sparked an initiative for gay people to join the movement of other marginalized groups in a quest to counteract widespread alienation to obtain the equal treatment and recognition they deserved. Today those activists joined by a whole new generation of proud homosexuals are still fighting for the right to be able to walk down an isle and commit their minds, bodies, and souls to the one they love in front of the people they love and have it be more than an impotent symbol of affection; they want their union to be recognized both socially and legally as a different but equal lifestyle choice. They want to partake in marriage, not "marriage". The most familiar argument that we hear today in the war fought by traditionalists and activists is the argument for the purpose of marriage. Traditionalists like Rick Santorum would argue along the lines that the purpose for marriage is children. Most gay activist would argue that the purpose for marriage is finding love in a lifelong companion. In Gay Marriage: Why It Is Good For Gays, Good For Straights And Good For America, Jonathan Rauch, an openly gay male, explains how gay marriage would be a universal good. Marriage has evolved over the years “nearly beyond recognition”[1] from wealthy aristocratic polygamy used to impose socially structured dominance over women, to a business merger whose main goal was financial security for women and a pool of family ties, to an institution bent on maintaining social norms and gender specialization, to our present marriage where love, an unstable chemical reaction, is on the forefront of the reasons to marry.[2] He argues that the marriage portrait is not as distinctively black and white as some would…

    • 2792 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Gay Marriage in America

    • 1844 Words
    • 8 Pages

    In the United States, marriage has always played a crucial role in the lives of its citizens. Known to some as a lifetime commitment of devotion, to others a promise to reside with a stranger, or even a matter arranged by parents, marriage is widely practiced and celebrated all over the world. Marriage can be said to be the ultimate act of love, supported with benefits and privileges from the government. The right to marry and love whoever you want has been an corner stone in culture for centuries. It has naturally left such an impact on the development of our country that it has been integrated into the parameters of the law. However, out-dated traditions dictate that marriage must be between a man and a woman, a notion that has sparked much debate in a society where the battle for equal opportunity and freedom of expression run rampant. The institution of marriage is only as strong as those who are in it, and it is weakened, by definition, when it arbitrarily excludes any class of couples. Moreover, to outlaw same-sex marriage is to deny equal-individual’s rights and freedoms under the first amendment, and a clear discrimination against one of our founding principles that is held dear by many.…

    • 1844 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    democracy in the quest for marriage equality. Columbia Journal of Gender and Law , 19…

    • 2378 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    One of the leading political debates in our country today is the legalization of same-sex marriages. The very image of marriage is evolving on an on-going basis due to society and the major changes between society defined unions. The definition of marriage, as defined by Webster’s Dictionary, states “Marriage, n., (1) the state of being united to a person of the opposite sex as husband or wife in a consensual and contractual relationship recognized by law (2) the state of being united to a person of the same sex in a relationship like that of a traditional marriage <same-sex marriage>.” The change was not made until 2003. Marriage, as per society, is a special event in almost everyone’s life. Marriage should be about getting married to someone you love a natural event no matter what sex that person is. It is not just a piece of paper that binds you together; it also involves legal aspects, economic & social issues as well. I plan to focus on how these issues are intertwined.…

    • 1742 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Loving vs. Virgina

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Can you imagine not being able to share your life with the person you love because of the color of your skin? Well, this was the case for those who resided in Virginia decades ago. Interracial marriages were not allowed in Virginia and sixteen other states due to the adoption of the Racial Integrity Act of 1924. The sole purpose of this act was to completely prohibit a "white person" marrying other than another "white person". Marriage licenses were not issued until the issuing official is content with the applications statements as to if their races are "correct". Richard Loving, a white man, and Mildred Jeter, a black woman, was not going to let the state of Virginia stop them from being married, so they left the state in June of 1958 to get married in the District of Columbia, where interracial marriages were permitted. This was the rise of the Loving v. Virginia case.…

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Two Types of Criminal Law

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages

    References: People v. Miller, No. 131, 2 No. 132, COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK, 2006 NY Slip Op 1194; 6 N.Y.3d 295; 845 N.E.2d 451; 812 N.Y.S.2d 20; 2006 N.Y. LEXIS 156, January 5, 2006, Argued , February 16, 2006, Decided…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Until recently, these same-sex marriages are becoming recognized as a legitimate form of union. In fact, societal ideals found this coupling as a social faux pas and were uneasy with accepting a marriage of this type. “Opponents of legalization warn that granting marital status to lesbians and gay men would threaten the institution of marriage and undermine the family,” (Taylor, Peplau & Sears, 2006,). Through the legalization process this arrangement has become more acceptable and the civil unions between same-sex marriages have increased, and with all of these ramifications the approval rate of this types of marriages are still low. “The majority of Americans disapprove of same-sex marriage. In recent national polls, two thirds of Americans oppose legalizing same-sex…

    • 2632 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Legalizing Gay Marriage

    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Marriage in the US is a secular and dynamic institution that has gone under several major transformations. Interracial marriage was illegal in many US states until a 1967 Supreme Court decision. Coverture, where a woman's legal rights and economic identity were subsumed by her husband upon marriage, was commonplace in 19th century America. No-fault divorce has changed the institution of marriage since its introduction in California on Jan. 1, 1970. Nancy Cott, PhD, testified in Perry v. Schwarzenegger that "[c]ivil law has always been supreme in defining and regulating marriage” and that religious leaders are accustomed to performing marriages only because the state has given them that authority.…

    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays