Preview

Loving Vs Virginia

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1779 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Loving Vs Virginia
Loving v. Virginia:Interracial Marriage

Years ago and to this day, when problems become major the supreme court of the United States solves them. A supreme court is the most grand judicial court in a country an individual can go to for additional help (“Supreme Court of the United States”). This is for extreme cases that threaten someone or something. The supreme court has the power to inform Congress that a law has violated the Constitution. This includes, but is not limited to, discrimination of gender, age, ethnicity, and other rights to pursue happiness. A woman named Mildred Jeter fell in love with a man named Richard Loving. The only reason they faced problems was because the color of their skin. The Loving v. Virginia
…show more content…
They were a normal couple who were deeply in love. Mildred Jeter was African American while Richard Loving was American (“Loving v. Virginia Supreme Court of the United States”). Due to this they had many hardships. Not only did these problems affect their personal lives, but it also affected the world around them. Many people saw them differently because of their skin colors. This was because black people were viewed as slaves. White people were not supposed to fall in love with people who work for them. Also, the restrictions not allowing mixed races to be together made an effort to keep the Lovings apart from each …show more content…
Virginia: The Case Over Interracial Marriage”). In the state of Virginia, the couple was sent to prison because they violated the miscegenation laws. One late night in their Virginia home, police broke into their house. Later, they were brought to prison.The authorities educated them about the laws of Virginia. The statement shows what happened to the Lovings. “At the October Term, 1958, of the Circuit Court of Caroline County, a grand jury issued an indictment charging the Lovings with violating Virginia's ban on interracial marriages” (“Loving v. Virginia LII”). Due to the fact they were charged guilty, the Lovings made the decision to take their case to court. On April 10, 1967, the angry couple explained that the law was a violation of their privacy and well-being. The following shows the Loving’s reason to get help. “These Lovings claimed that the state law violated their 14th Amendment rights to pursuit life, liberty and happiness” (“Loving v Virginia” laws.com). In this ruling,the judge was Leon. M Bazile. Immediately, he made his final decision about the conflict. He believed that people of different ethnicities were not supposed to love each other. Leon Bazile quoted, "Almighty God created the races white, black, yellow, Malay and red, and he placed them on separate continents ... The fact that he separated the races shows that he did not intend for the races

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    In 1963, the Lovings filed a motion in State Trail court on the grounds on Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment were violated.…

    • 109 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Mildred Jeter, an African-American woman, and Richard Loving, a white man, went to Washington, D.C, to get married and avoid Virginia’s interracial marriage ban. When they returned to Virginia not long after, the Lovings were arrested under the charges of violating Virginia’s interracial marriage ban.…

    • 189 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Virginia on April 7th 2003 a divided United States Supreme Court opened the possibility of constitutionally restricting certain types of hate speech. The court was to hear a case that spoke to one specific Virginia state statute that prohibited cross burning with the intent to intimidate, and also rendered that any such burning shall be prima facie evidence of an intent to intimidate a person or group. This court would see this statute being used between two separate cases. The first case was against Barry Black; in August of 1998 Black led a Ku Klux Klan rally at which the conclusion resulted in the burning of a cross on private property with the permission of the owner. Black was charged under the state statute, “Burning a cross with the intent to intimidate.” [347] The jury was instructed in accordance with the Model Jury Instruction that the burning of the cross by itself is sufficient evidence from which you may infer the required intent. [364] In May 1998 Richard Elliot and Jonathan O’Mara attempted to burn a cross on the lawn of Elliot’s neighbor and were charged in accordance under the cross-burning statute. After all of the respondents were convicted, they appealed to the Supreme Court of Virginia arguing that the cross-burning statute is unconstitutional. The Virginia Supreme court reversed all the convictions holding that the Virginia cross-burning statute is analytically indistinguishable from the ordinance found…

    • 884 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Virginia vs Moore

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages

    February 20, 2003 Portsmouth, Virginia two detectives responded to a radio call of a suspended driver. (No clear location of the traffic stop) after the subject was arrested he was moved to the second location. Second location was the hotel parking lot of Moore where the officers decided to search him finding the 16grams of crack cocaine in his jacket pocket, and $516 in his pants pocket. David Lee Moore was convicted of possession of cocaine with the intent to distribute in the Circuit Court of the City of Portsmouth. Moore was originally being stopped for operating a vehicle while having a suspended driver’s license. This would have only been a Class 1 misdemeanor. While being searched the officers found sixteen grams of crack cocaine and five hundred and sixteen dollars.…

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Notes on the States of Virginia was the full length book written by Thomas Jefferson in 1781, during the American revolutionary war. In 1780, the secretary of the French legation to the United States “Francois Marbois” had drawn up 22 questions wishing to collect information on each of the 13 states to answer to his superiors. Those questions were sent to several possible informants including Joseph Jones, who at that time a member of congressional delegation. He had written the original questionnaire in his own hand writing and had given it to Thomas Jefferson; the second governor of Virginia who he had thought was the best person to answer all of the complicated questions about the beloved state. Joseph Jones knew about this Virginian’s knowledge and passion about the largest of the 13 original states. Jefferson rearranged Marboi’s 22 queries into the 23 queries and conducts his readers from a discussion of geography of Virginia through the state’s civilization.…

    • 1092 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Loving v Virginia a married couple from Washington D.C. moved to Virginia where they were then subject to Virginia’s anti-miscegenation statute. Anti-miscegenation laws prohibit the marrying of different races with another. In Virginia, this statute prohibited the marriage between whites and any other race. Richard Loving, a white man, and Mildred Jeter, a black woman, were married in Washington D.C. They then moved to the state of Virginia where they faced criminal charges. Both of them pled guilty and were sentenced to one year imprisonment but the sentence would be waved for 25 years if they moved out of state and didn’t return.…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mcculloch V. Maryland

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In many ways, the opinion in this case represents a final step in the creation of…

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    virginia v morre

    • 1241 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The day was February 20,2003, in the city of Portsmouth where two Portsmouth police officers had pulled a vehicle over who was driven by David Lee Moore. While listening to police radio they had heard that the man they pulled over who went by the nickname “chubs” was driving on a suspended license. The officer’s soon determined that chubbs was indeed driving on a suspended license. The officers who made the stop arrested chubbs for the misdemeanor of driving on a suspended license. This violation could have lead to chubbs serving a 1-year in jail and a $25,000 fine, according to Va Code Ann 18.2-11. The officers then searched the vehicle in which chubbs was driving. During the search of the vehicle the officers found 16 grams of crack cocaine and $516 in cash. The state law of Virginia states that the officers should have offered Moore a summons rather than arresting him. The statutes of the Fourth Amendment give the officers the right to search if they believe a crime was committed in their presence. The act of driving on a suspended license is not an offense you can be arrested for unlike other misdemeanors.…

    • 1241 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “It is better to be hated for what you are then to be loved for what you are not,” this was said by Andre Gide and there has never been a more true statement. In this paper the topic of Obergefell V. Hodges will be discussed. Obergefell V. Hodges is the court case that talks about gay marriage. Many are against the topic, but maybe they should open their minds a little more and accept that love is love.…

    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Jim Crow Laws is a list of laws that were used in previous years in different parts of the United States of America. The law above was from the state of Georgia and it forbid marriage between races. Similar laws existed in Maycomb, Alabama in the 1930s. White and black folks were separated in courtrooms, churches, and were not allowed to marry. Those who married and had mixed children were often seen as “in betweens” (Lee, 1960).…

    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Subjectivity for Lct1 Wgu

    • 980 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In Maureen Dowd’s opinion column entitled “Happily Never After?” she expresses doubt in the Supreme Courts ability to rule in a way that she feels is fair to the Gay and Lesbian community. In her view the Supreme Court Justices are out of touch with society and they will fail to provide equality for gay couples who are only seeking equal respect in the law; to be treated just like other Americans and have the legal right to marry in their “pursuit of happiness.”…

    • 980 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tennessee V Garner

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Supreme Court has made many decisions about police conduct but very few have had the impact on all of law enforcement as that of Tennessee vs. Garner. This landmark case has set very clear lines as when an officer of the law may use deadly force on a fleeing suspect.…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions sparked great controversy throughout the United States during 1798 and 1799. The resolutions were manifestos that protested against the Federalist Alien and Sedition Acts. The authors of the resolutions remained anonymous, but were written by James Madison and Thomas Jefferson, who were upset with how the Federalists were ruling the nation. These two republicans knew something needed to be done for the central government to be limited and the states to gain more power.…

    • 675 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kennedy Vs Louisiana

    • 847 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Capital punishment is the legally authorized killing of someone as a punishment. Does capital punishment deter crimes? I strongly believe capital punishment does not deter crime. On June 25, 2008, Kennedy vs. Louisiana, case went to the U.S Supreme Court. The Kennedy vs. Louisiana case is informing, Petitioner Patrick Kennedy was convicted and sentenced to death in Louisiana for the rape of his 8 year old step daughter. Louisiana state statute authorized capital punishment for the rape of a child under 12 years of age. Patrick Kennedy did have capital punishment deal with him, but that does not mean that it stops other people from doing the same thing. That was one example of capital punishment. Overall, I firmly believe that capital punishment does not deter crime.…

    • 847 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Interracial marriage is a controversial topic, but it really doesn’t need to be. Marriage, although not directly mentioned in the Constitution, is viewed as a basic Constitutional right, and should be allowed for any two persons, no matter what they look like or where they came from. In fact, scientific studies have proven that race shouldn’t be an issue at all. Some might argue that, in the scriptures, God separated the different races, but they forget that he created them all together in the beginning. While some people believe that interracial marriage should not be allowed, the choice to marry who you want is a basic constitutional right, and science has proven that genetically, race does not actually exist.…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays