Preview

Intermediate Sanctions

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
297 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Intermediate Sanctions
Intermediate Sanctions
Intermediate sanctions are the sanctions that are more restrictive than the probation and less restrictive than imprisonment. It is also intended to relieve the pressure on the over crowed facilities that deal with the corrections and the probation departments that are understaffed.
The purpose for the intermediate sanction in the criminal justice process is that it helps with any of the concerns from the facilities being packed and over crowed. Jails and the prisons are packed more this century then the last century. It also helps with the short staff that is in the offices and the probation officers short staffed. The government should take it under consideration that the criminal justice system needs the staff and the money to make the criminal justice organization work together.
There are two functions as a sentencing alternative in the intermediate sanction. They are to divert the offenders from the overcrowded jails or prisons. The second one is to place the different offenders under the higher levels of the control. It is the risk that the community poses to. * I believe that the intermediate sanctions are not an appropriate punishment. People should not have to serve their time behind bars because they prisons and jail cells are over packed and crowded. The government should put in more funds so that if people do the crime, then they should do the time. Also, probation is an advantage and that people should not be misused. * In conclusion, I believe that the intermediate sanction can work out if people do not take advantage of the probation punishment. This punishment should only be used if there is no room in the jail cell or the prisons. I believe that once someone does a crime, that that person may do it again. * * * *

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    These sanctions are divided into two sub groups, judicially administered and probation administered. Judicially administered intermediate sanctions consist of fines, community service, restitution, forfeiture of property, and pretrial diversion groups. Probation administered intermediate sanctions consist of day reporting centers, ISP (Intensive Supervision Probation), shock incarceration, home confinement, and electronic monitoring. Day reporting…

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    * Write a 200- to 300-word response defining what intermediate sanctions are, their purpose in the criminal justice process, and their function as a sentencing alternative. Then, answer this question: Do you feel intermediate sanctions are an appropriate punishment? Explain your rationale.…

    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The sentencing system should not be altered, for decreasing the focus and increasing the frequency of sentencing would do more harm than good. An emphasis on merely punishment and retribution in criminal sentencing would prevent the right of an offender to a fair trial. Furthermore, set and compulsory sentencing ignores personal circumstances, which in some cases could make all the difference. With these aggravating factors, hardening the system of law will not bring any advantages to society.…

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Keeping in mind the brief overview of each of the major rationales for sentencing will allow the following four arguments to be understood with greater clarity. To begin, the first argument to support the urgent need to restructure the criminal justice system is the effect and impact of mandatory minimum sentencing on the high rates of incarcerations. The effects of mandatory minimum sentencing are staggering, and transcend into many different areas of the criminal justice system. The principal justification for the creation of mandatory minimum sentences is that by increasing the likelihood of custody, it will be a strict deterrent for crime prevention and a response to political “tough on crime” strategies. It was also thought to minimize…

    • 1521 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    M1 Custodial Care

    • 370 Words
    • 1 Page

    These two types of schemes work extremely well in prisons. The Adjudications work well because some prisoners think that they are in prison they cannot be punished further, however these adjudications could make them realise they are not above anything and can still be punished for their actions. Whereas for the prisoners who behave well and do not try anything against the rules, the rewards are given. This could make them realise that they do not need to…

    • 370 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    that a person can gain a whole new understanding of their problems and troubles when they are…

    • 525 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Instead of sentencing these individuals to jail alternative sentencing options are suggested. This includes probation, community service, residential treatment, as well as other options that don’t include jail time for lesser offenses.…

    • 1775 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I do think that the mandatory sentencing is one approach to solving the drug problem, but I do not think that it is the only one. It is clear that the sentencing works to a certain extent, but is not the right choice for every situation. Personally, I feel like this is a gray area due to the fact that mandatory sentencing gives definitive discipline to someone who broke the law. Where in specific cases that approach is too strict. Although I do not have a direct answer to solve this problem, I think that different variables should play into the sentencing.…

    • 102 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Today in our country our justice system runs by two models in order to keep peace and order to the public the first model is the determinate sentencing model what the Determinate model is when the judge is about to pass a sentence on to defendant and to address the problem with crimes that has been going around since the 1980s for example the government of some states in our country passed the three strike laws where when someone commits a crime that is considered serious then they get harsher sentences and to tell people who are more likely to commit the crime to don’t do it and it is not worth it . One of the pros for the determinate sentencing model is that the defendant could be eligible for probation, parole and alternative programs…

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ultimately, I would advocate indeterminate sentencing for suspects that caused part 1 offenses while I would advocate determinate sentencing for suspects that only caused part two offenses. Of course, many will probably disagree with this assertion but one thing is for sure, without the proper use of sentencing, our community would be far more dangerous than before.…

    • 334 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Determinate Sentencing

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages

    An indeterminate sentencing is a term of incarceration in which a judge determines the minimum and maximum terms of imprisonment. When the minimum term is reached, the prisoner becomes eligible to be paroled. A judge can prescribe a particular term, after which an administrative body known as the parole board decides at what point the offender is to be released. A prisoner is aware that he or she is eligible for parole as soon as the minimum time has been served and that good behavior can further shorten the sentence.In determinate sentencing, a period of incarceration that is fixed by a sentencing authority and cannot be reduced by judges or other corrections officials. If the legislature deems that the punishment for a first-time armed robber is ten years, then the judge has no choice but to impose a sentence of ten years and the criminal will serve ten years minus good time before being freed. In good times sentencing, a reduction in time served by prisoners based on good behavior, conformity to rules, and ther positive actions. In truth-in-sentencing laws, legislative attempts to assure that convicts will serve approximately the terms to whinch they were initially sentenced. The sentencing ritual strongly lends itself to the concept of individualized justice. Most judges consider two factors above all others: the seriousness of the crime and any mitigating or aggravating…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I believe mandatory sentences could be effective if the correctional system was expanded to accommodate the increase of prisoners. From what I have learned so far, the political climate of the country has a lot to do with sentencing laws. It can be a rollercoaster of tough on crime methods to programs designed to lessen punishment. Mandatory…

    • 201 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    American Prison System

    • 939 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Sanctions are available in the courts the deal with those who commit criminal offences and are sentenced to correctional facilities including jails and prisons. Today’s sanctions are harsh; however, in early prison history the sanctions were harder. State prison systems were based on legal reforms of the eighteenth century, but were actually founded in the nineteenth century. Racism and the human right movements caused many rioted in prisons and formed new alliances.…

    • 939 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I believe that in order to rehabilitate prisoners and deter future offenses, a stronger concentration and commitment by the Department of Correctional Services to rehabilitative services needs to be established. We, as a society, should take responsibility for its citizens. Although they have made mistakes, these criminals are victims of societal negligence and should be given the opportunity of rehabilitation, gainful employment, and the chance of normal lives.…

    • 295 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Legal Sentencing Procedure

    • 1485 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The purpose of punishment is paramount for the protection of society. Sentencing is traditionally the means in which the state and the community punish the offender for the crime they have committed. For a sentencing to occur the judge or magistrate may try to fulfil punishment objectives such as: incapacitation which is needed to protect society by removing the offender from society. Deterrence which tries to inhibit an individual offender as well as sending a message to the community that criminal behaviour is unacceptable and will be punished. Rehabilitation which tries to change the behaviour of the offender so that they will not re-offend. Retribution can be seen as the most important factor in sentencing. The impact of the crime will reflect on society, thus retribution encompasses the notion that the punishment should fit the crime. This is the most important factor of sentencing. The judge or magistrate has to consider the particular sentence to provide for the accused. THE CRIMES (SENTENCING PROCEDURES) ACT 1999 (NSW) lays down the allowable purpose of sentencing in s 3A of the act, this act is cost efficient to society and requires no additional resources to enforce its guidelines. An example of the purpose of punishment incapacitation, deterrence, rehabilitation and retribution is evident in the case Regina v Milat February 1998 where Ivan Milat was sentenced seven consecutive life sentences plus eighteen years. The punishment was given primarily on…

    • 1485 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics