Preview

Interference with Property

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1501 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Interference with Property
Interference with Property

What is Interference with Property:
Intentional interference with property is the section under intentional tort law that protects a citizen from having their land trespassed on, chattels stolen or obtained by people that should not have their items.It is also the act that protects your rights as a Canadian citizen to privacy and protection of property.

Types of Interference with Property:
There are four main sections under which intentional interference with property can be broken into; Trespass to Land, Nuisance, Trespass, to Chattels, and Conversion, each put in place to preserve the rights each citizen has when it comes to privacy.

Trespass to Land - deals with the most well known type of intentional tort. It ranges from direct violations of restraining orders and other court orders, to being asked to leave a house after a party and not doing so. Although it is usually not a situation that may arise, if the unwanted person will not leave despite attempts by the property owner to eject the person, sufficient force may be used. Trespassing however can also be less direct and be committed hundreds of feet off the property when acts such as blasting are being done.

Nuisance - to be a nuisance, is to do something that interferes with the civil liberties that a Canadian citizen has by means of noise, parties, or other such obstructions that may infringe upon a persons property. When a house is damaged because of blasting taking place near by the victims of the damage may seek retribution. Other forms of nuisance may take place once you are already in a house can fall under a different section, called Trespass to Chattels.

Chattels - are the physical items that people own such as CD’s, cars, clothing, etc. Just by holding a persons item when you are not allowed to be considered a violation. Although under trespass to chattels, the item does not have to be damaged, it is possible to take civil action because of



Bibliography: http://www.docstoc.com/docs/7173/Rogers-v-Board-of-Road http://www.casebriefs.com/blog/law/torts/torts-keyed-to-prosser/intentional-interference-with-person-or-property/rogers-v-board-of-road-comrs-for-kent-county/ http://tort.laws.com/intentional-interference/intentional-interference-with-a-person-property

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    A mere trespass to land or personal property was not a crime at common law unless it was committed forcibly or maliciously.…

    • 1145 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    TORT - A Tort is a civil wrong that is outside of Contract Law and arises out of a recognition that a person is responsible for their acts and omissions when dealing with others. The term "Tort" refers to a number of different laws such as nuisance, trespass and assault. Torts action generally compensates the individual for personal loss where the loss was caused by another person. It is based on Common Law.…

    • 9301 Words
    • 38 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Unit 1 W300

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Can be some cross over – e.g burglar commits tort of trespass and the crime.…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    LA 245 Study Guide

    • 6344 Words
    • 24 Pages

    Intentional torts: harm caused by deliberate action. Ex: newspaper columnist who wrongly accuses someone of being a drunk has committed intentional torts…

    • 6344 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Courtroom Matrix

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages

    | Is to have a crime committed against him or her resulting in lost of property, damage to property or person.…

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Week 1 Quiz

    • 774 Words
    • 4 Pages

    | When a person interferes with another's right to own and use personal property, the person is…

    • 774 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    To commit the tort of trespass to land, a person does not need to actually harm the…

    • 435 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Case Of Charles Katz

    • 787 Words
    • 4 Pages

    I. Does the right to privacy apply to telephone booths and other public places? II. Do a physical intrusion have to be necessary to constitute a search? III. Does…

    • 787 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Drone Home Analysis

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Koerner states that “Fourth Amendment jurisprudence has extended this property rights paradigm to the curtilage doctrine. In determining whether an area forms the curtilage, courts have considered a variety of factors, including ‘the proximity of the area ... to the home, whether the area is included within an enclosure surrounding the home’” (Koerner 3).…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    7. Describe a real or made up example of the tort of interference. (1-5 sentences. 2.0 points)…

    • 276 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Webster’s Dictionary defines Intrude as to put forward or interpose (oneself, one’s views, something) abruptly or without invitation. If I were to use it in a sentence, I would write “The government of the United States love to technologically intrude on its citizens.” Even though there are certain protections listed in the 4th Amendment including the right for all citizens to be secure in their persons, homes, papers and effects, against unreasonable search and seizure. It also states that unless given probable cause, there must be a warrant supported by cause, oath, and affirmation. When it comes to House Arrest, some may say the fact that there is a digital GPS on the convict’s ankle seeing and tracking every move they make is considered intrusive.…

    • 778 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Brill Torts Outline

    • 12012 Words
    • 49 Pages

    v. For trespass to chattels and conversion, the intent factor was identical; the two torts overlap. Thus, for both of these torts, the defendant had to intend to assert dominion or control over plaintiff 's chattel. The completed tort would be trespass to chattels if the exercise of dominion or control resulted in harm to the chattel or if it caused the interference with plaintiff 's use of the chattel for an unreasonable length of time. The completed tort would be conversion if the defendant 's assertion of dominion or control resulted in damage or interference with plaintiff 's use of the chattel of such a serious nature that defendant was required to pay the full market value of the chattel.…

    • 12012 Words
    • 49 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the case of Reeves vs Meridian Southern, it was alleged that Meridian Southern placed railcars on spurs without permission. Meridian had used this spur for years and years without incident till this case. Meridian Southern should have been informed by Reeves about the change of ownership. Trespassers are ones who enter another’s land unlawfully without consent or the privilege to be there. By this definition, Meridian Southern is trespassing Reeve’s land. This could have all been avoided if Meridian Southern would have asked for permission to use the spur. Even if they had to pay for the use of it.…

    • 101 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    LAWS1061 Exam Notes

    • 10741 Words
    • 47 Pages

    Definition of tort law concerns the obligations of persons living a crowded society to respect the safety, property and personality of their neighbours both as priori and ex post matters (compensation to those wrongfully harmed).…

    • 10741 Words
    • 47 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Torts Breakdown of Elements

    • 3166 Words
    • 13 Pages

    1. Intentional torts are actions with the purpose or intention to injure another person or that person’s property. The person inflicting the harm is called a tortfeasor. Intentional torts require intent. The person who committed the tort must have intended to cause harm. The harm, however, does not require malice or ill will, just the knowledge that certain consequences would result from their acts. Most often, the consequences result in some type of harm. Intentional torts involve intentional acts, and carry a high degree of risk if injury, and usually a low degree of social benefit. The risk generally outweighs the benefit received; therefore, the duty not to intentionally injure someone or something is great.…

    • 3166 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Good Essays