Drone Home Analysis
1. Drones are capable of being used by terrorists and other criminals for their bad intentions. For example, in the article “Drone Home” on page 7, Lev Grossman points out the possible security concerns revolving the domestic use of drones.
2. Grossman states that “They provoke a new kind of anxiety, quite unlike the nuclear terror of the 1980s or the conspiracy-theory paranoia of the 1990s. They're a swarming, persistent presence, low-level but ubiquitous and above all anonymous. They could be al-Qaeda or your government or your friends and neighbors” (Grossman 7).
3. This comment made by the author shows the potential risks involving drones. This statement made by Grossman informs the reader that no one knows who the drones belong to they can be your neighbors, or from a terrorist group not to mention what the drone might be carrying.
C. After the nine eleven attack security has been America’s main concern. But with the entrance of drones, security is going to be at …show more content…
In addition to McGlinn’s concerns Koerner points out the property right issue involving drones.
1. Another problem involving fourth amendment, that the drones also have consider, are the property rights issues. For example, in the article “Drones and the Fourth Amendment: Redefining Expectations of Privacy on page 3, Matthew R. Koerner points out the possible property right concerns revolving the domestic use of drones.
2. Koerner states that “Fourth Amendment jurisprudence has extended this property rights paradigm to the curtilage doctrine. In determining whether an area forms the curtilage, courts have considered a variety of factors, including ‘the proximity of the area ... to the home, whether the area is included within an enclosure surrounding the home’” (Koerner 3).
3. Through this statement the author informs the reader that not only are privacy rights a concern for the government, but the entrance of drones also questions the property rights and to what extent can drones participate in
2. Grossman states that “They provoke a new kind of anxiety, quite unlike the nuclear terror of the 1980s or the conspiracy-theory paranoia of the 1990s. They're a swarming, persistent presence, low-level but ubiquitous and above all anonymous. They could be al-Qaeda or your government or your friends and neighbors” (Grossman 7).
3. This comment made by the author shows the potential risks involving drones. This statement made by Grossman informs the reader that no one knows who the drones belong to they can be your neighbors, or from a terrorist group not to mention what the drone might be carrying.
C. After the nine eleven attack security has been America’s main concern. But with the entrance of drones, security is going to be at …show more content…
In addition to McGlinn’s concerns Koerner points out the property right issue involving drones.
1. Another problem involving fourth amendment, that the drones also have consider, are the property rights issues. For example, in the article “Drones and the Fourth Amendment: Redefining Expectations of Privacy on page 3, Matthew R. Koerner points out the possible property right concerns revolving the domestic use of drones.
2. Koerner states that “Fourth Amendment jurisprudence has extended this property rights paradigm to the curtilage doctrine. In determining whether an area forms the curtilage, courts have considered a variety of factors, including ‘the proximity of the area ... to the home, whether the area is included within an enclosure surrounding the home’” (Koerner 3).
3. Through this statement the author informs the reader that not only are privacy rights a concern for the government, but the entrance of drones also questions the property rights and to what extent can drones participate in