Examples Of Intrude In The United States

Webster’s Dictionary defines Intrude as to put forward or interpose (oneself, one’s views, something) abruptly or without invitation. If I were to use it in a sentence, I would write “The government of the United States love to technologically intrude on its citizens.” Even though there are certain protections listed in the 4th Amendment including the right for all citizens to be secure in their persons, homes, papers and effects, against unreasonable search and seizure. It also states that unless given probable cause, there must be a warrant supported by cause, oath, and affirmation. When it comes to House Arrest, some may say the fact that there is a digital GPS on the convict’s ankle seeing and tracking every move they make is considered intrusive. The device is keeping tabs on the convict and giving the police an inside track on every move he/she makes. I do not think this is intrusive at all. It is a matter of safety and security for all citizens. Some may also say that state programs do not allow violent criminals or sex offenders to participate in House Arrest, so is the federal justice system not intruding
Ohio, the Supreme Court of the United States held that police can stop and frisk a person if the officer has suspicion that the person has committed a crime, planning a crime, or about to commit a crime. The officer only has to have a reasonable belief that there is a weapon on their person. This “stop and frisk” is for the safety of the officer and everyone involved. When the law was passed, there was controversy surrounding how the police were choosing who got stopped and not. Many of the officers were taking it upon themselves to use racial profiling in the stop causing a race war against the police. Is the “stop and frisk” intrusive? Some think so, but I am not one of those people. When the law is used appropriately, then the stop and frisk is for safety and protection. This is the rationale behind