Preview

LA 245 Study Guide

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
6344 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
LA 245 Study Guide
Exam 2 Study Guide

Chapter 6:
Torts: a violation of a duty imposed by the civil law. When someone breaks one of those duties and injures another, it is tort
It is up to the injured party to seek compensation – this lawyer has to convince the judge that the defendant breached legal duty and owes money
Intentional torts: harm caused by deliberate action. Ex: newspaper columnist who wrongly accuses someone of being a drunk has committed intentional torts
Libel: written defamation, newspapers
Slander: oral defamation, professor calls sally a drug dealer in class
Defamatory statement: likely to harm another’s reputation
Falseness: statement must be false
Communicated: must be communicated to at least one person other than the plaintiff
Injury: plaintiff must show injury
Slander per se: involves false statement, about sexual behavior, crimes, disease, and professional abilities
False Imprisonment: the intentional restraint of another person without reasonable cause and without consent
Ex: a store may detain a customer or worker for allegedly shoplifting provided there is a reasonable basis for the suspicion and detention is done reasonably
Intentional infliction of emotional distress: an intentional tort in which the harm results from extreme and outrageous conduct that causes serious emotional harm
Battery: the intentional touching of another person in a way that is unwanted or offensive
You don’t have to have intention to harm or hurt but the intention to complete action
Spitting is battery
Assault: occurs when a defendant does some act that makes a plaintiff fear an imminent battery
Fraud: injuring another person by deliberate deception
Damages:
Compensatory damages: money intended to restore a plaintiff to the position he was in before the jury
Single recovery principle: requires a court to settle the matter once and for all, by awarding a lump sum for past and future expenses
Punitive damages: intended to punish the defendant for conduct

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    An intentional tort is a person deliberately causing harm or loss to another person. Examples are trespassing, causing a nuisance and defaming are intentional torts.…

    • 1189 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    To commit an intentional tort, one person must intend to harm a certain other person.…

    • 4685 Words
    • 31 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    References: LexisNexis, (2012). Part a. intentional torts and privileges chapter 1 intentional interferences with persons or property. Retrieved from website: http://www.lexisnexis.com/lawschool/study/outlines/html/torts/index.asp…

    • 847 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nominate Delicts

    • 4283 Words
    • 18 Pages

    1. Assault – a deliberate act that intended to harm the victim physically or raise the state of fear of immediate physical harm without the consent of the victim.…

    • 4283 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Study

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages

    According to the book, the tort of intentional infliction of emotional distress can be defined as an extreme and outrageous act, intentionally committed, that results in severe emotional distress to another. To be actionable (capable of serving as the ground for a lawsuit), the conduct must be so extreme and outrageous that it exceeds the bounds of decency accepted by society. Business Law Today, 10th Edition, pg. 99.…

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Assault is an intentional tort in which there is offensive physical contact or an act that…

    • 1386 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    ASSAULT

    • 2985 Words
    • 10 Pages

    At common law, an assault is any act committed intentionally or recklessly, that causes another person to apprehend immediate or unlawful violence. If force is actually applied, directly or indirectly, and unlawfully, without the consent of the person assaulted, the assault becomes a battery, however slight the force (Fagan)…

    • 2985 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ptarmigan Investment

    • 320 Words
    • 1 Page

    The case that was present in 16.5 is that a breach of contract by Ptarmigan Investment Company who had contracted Gunderson’s, Inc. to construct a golf course for them. After just a third of the work had been completed, Ptarmigan Investment Company ran out of funds to cater for the rest of the project. Therefore, they would not be in a position to pay for the remaining two thirds of the work. Gunderson’s, Inc. has sued the company in a bid to recover the lost profits which if granted would be given to them as damages. The question presented is whether Gunderson’s, Inc. can recover the lost profits as damages. It is evident that the investment company has gone against its agreement with the contractor. Ptarmigan Investment Company has rendered inferior performance of its obligations under the contract. In an unprecedented turn of events, they are unable to pay the contractor for their services. Although the work was yet to be completed, the contractor had anticipated a certain amount of profit. Therefore, they are justified under the law to claim compensation from the breaching party. Gunderson, Inc. can receive damages in form of monetary compensation. This is one of the methods used to remedy contract breaches. Compensatory damages are awarded in the event that a breach of contract has led to a loss of a bargain. In so doing it places the non-breaching party in the same position it would have been had the contract been fully performed with regard to the benefits accrued. In this case, payment to the contractor was estimated at $1,294,129 and payment had already been made for a third of the work. The sum of money owed to restore the bargain made is $ 867,066, which would ensure that the contractor has earned their full profits. Gunderson’s, Inc. can recover lost profits as damages because the contract was breached before completion of the construction…

    • 320 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Law of Tresspass

    • 1123 Words
    • 5 Pages

    This means the act of putting another person in reasonable fear or apprehension of immediate battery.…

    • 1123 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Defamation in Law

    • 1364 Words
    • 6 Pages

    A tort is an act/omission in instances where by law there is a duty owed by one party/entity as against another to do or refrain from doing an act and a failure to comply results in civil liability…

    • 1364 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Brill Torts Outline

    • 12012 Words
    • 49 Pages

    ii. For assault, the defendant must have intended to cause the plaintiff a reasonable belief that plaintiff was about to immediately suffer a battery.…

    • 12012 Words
    • 49 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Battery is defined as “an intentional and offensive touching of another without lawful justification” according to Black’s Law Dictionary. The three main elements that identify battery are: “unconsented physical contact, offensive or harmful contact, and the tortfeasor’s intent to touch another person in an offensive or injurious manner (Buckley & Okrent, 2004).” One of the key elements is intent. If a person touches you but it was accidently, it would not be considered battery. The intent to injure the person must be present for battery. Also, if the tortfeasor intends to make harmful physical contact with one person, and accidently hits a different person, the intent is transferred to the unintended victim. So even if the tortfeasor didn’t intend to hit a third person, it is still a battery on that individual.…

    • 1128 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tort Outline

    • 9959 Words
    • 40 Pages

    1) Introduction a) Definition – A tort is a civil wrong, other than breach of contract, for which the law provides a remedy. A person who breaches a tort duty (i.e., a duty to act in a manner that will not injure another person) has committed a tort and may be liable in a lawsuit brought by a person injured because of that tort. Torts is a fault-based system. b) Purposes of tort law: (1) to provide a peaceful means for adjusting the rights of parties who might otherwise “take the law into their own hands”; (2) to deter wrongful action; (3) to encourage socially responsible behavior; and, (4) to restore injured parties to their original condition, insofar as the law can do this, by compensating them for their injury. 2) Intentional Torts a) Assault, battery, false imprisonment, trespass to chattels, and trespass to land. b) Intent i) Meaning of intent: There is no general meaning of “intent” when discussing intentional torts. For each individual tort, you have to memorize a different definition of “intent.” All that the intentional torts have in common is that D must have intended to bring about some sort of physical or mental effect upon another person. (1) No intent to harm: The intentional torts are generally not defined in such a way as to require D to have intended to harm the plaintiff. (Example: D points a water gun at P, making it seem like a robbery, when in fact it is a practical joke. If D has intended to put P in fear of imminent harmful bodily contact, the intent for assault…

    • 9959 Words
    • 40 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hcr Week 8 Legal Terms

    • 327 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Battery: Touching a person without their consent, like if a doctor does a physical on someone without written consent…

    • 327 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Torts Breakdown of Elements

    • 3166 Words
    • 13 Pages

    1. Intentional torts are actions with the purpose or intention to injure another person or that person’s property. The person inflicting the harm is called a tortfeasor. Intentional torts require intent. The person who committed the tort must have intended to cause harm. The harm, however, does not require malice or ill will, just the knowledge that certain consequences would result from their acts. Most often, the consequences result in some type of harm. Intentional torts involve intentional acts, and carry a high degree of risk if injury, and usually a low degree of social benefit. The risk generally outweighs the benefit received; therefore, the duty not to intentionally injure someone or something is great.…

    • 3166 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Good Essays