Preview

Defamation in Law

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1364 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Defamation in Law
Law

Tort Law

A tort is an act/omission in instances where by law there is a duty owed by one party/entity as against another to do or refrain from doing an act and a failure to comply results in civil liability

To Establish Tort One Must Have:
Duty of Care/Duty being owed
Breach
Harm/ Damage caused by that Breach

Difference between Crime and a Tort
Crimes are omissions or acts against the state while a tort is against private entities.
Crime- Fine/ Imprisonment while in Tort- Damages/ Injunction.

Defamation

Defamatory Statements are those which tend to lower one's estimation in the minds of right thinking persons.

There are three constituent elements that one must find before an action towards defamation can be made out.

First the words themselves must be defamatory or capable of defaming the plaintiff.

Secondly the words must refer to the plaintiff.

Thirdly, the words must be published to one other person than the plaintiff. Therefore the defamatory statements must be exposed to someone other than the plaintiff.

Intermediate liability - the channel which facilitates the defamatory statements may or may not be liable depending on the platforms involvement in endorsing the statement (directly re-quoting the statement)

The law of defamation seeks to protect an entity's or individual's reputation. In doing so the law balances to fundamental rights. On one hand a person is entitled to freedom of speech or expression but this must be curtailed by respect for and recognition of a person's right to a reputation. The concept of one's reputation is not limited to individuals it also includes corporate entities which like individuals through years of service by obtaining certain qualifications or simply by maintaining certain practices can develop a clientele, a reputation that earns significant profit or other benefits which may or may not be tangible.

The law makes a distinction between defamatory statements in a permanent as

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    1. What is the most “jealously” protected kind of speech, according to the court in this case? (3 points)…

    • 1852 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Bugusa, Inc., Worksheet

    • 1035 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Communicated to a third party. By advertising the disparaging statement, WIRETIME communicated to a third party, the public, thus satisfying the third condition of trade libel.…

    • 1035 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    BUGusa Inc. Worksheet

    • 1160 Words
    • 5 Pages

    1) The defamatory statement must be “clear and specific” to the company or product. WIRETIME clearly stated in the ad that the equipment used by BUGusa, Inc. was “low quality and did not work reliably for more than 1 month,” (University of Phoenix, 2013). The statement was made against a specific company and their specific product.…

    • 1160 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    It seems WIRETIME, Inc. (a relatively new competitor) committed intentional tort advertising negative information in a well-known industry magazine in regard to BUGusa, Inc.’s devices being low quality and stating the devices works for one month only. An intentional tort occurs when a party intentionally caused another party to suffer injury or damage (Larson, 2005). In this particular scenario, WIRETIME, Inc. posting an advertisement as such participated in a libel act. A libel act involves making defamatory statements in a fixed medium, such as a magazine or newspaper (Larson, 2005). Defamation is considered as an act of harming the reputation of a person or company by making false statements to another person or company (Larson, 2005).…

    • 847 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    GBL 295 EXAM 2

    • 1533 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Tort: A “Civil Wrong” Torts refer to a general classification covering civil causes of action…

    • 1533 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Unit 1 W300

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Can be some cross over – e.g burglar commits tort of trespass and the crime.…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Eposito Case

    • 551 Words
    • 3 Pages

    4. According to the case, why was this not defamation, and what tort did the court approve a filing for?…

    • 551 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Esposito v. SFX

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages

    “A statement is defamatory if it tends to expose the plaintiff to public hatred, contempt, ridicule or disgrace--that is, if it would tend to lead the average person in the community to form an evil or bad opinion of the plaintiff.” (Taken from LexisNexis, Esposito v SFX case)…

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    LA 245 Study Guide

    • 6344 Words
    • 24 Pages

    Torts: a violation of a duty imposed by the civil law. When someone breaks one of those duties and injures another, it is tort…

    • 6344 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mr Wolf Research Paper

    • 444 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The New app that protects residents from wolf menace in story book land has enhanced people protection against the big bad wolf. In line six-eight it says “Mr. Wolf is said to have destroyed two of the Three Little Pig’s homes with his horrible breath, and according to a police report he ate Grandma whole in order to deceive Little Red Riding Hood.” In this statement its libel (defamation) Mr. wolf is being accused of destroying the three little pigs home. This statement can bring harm to Mr. Wolf reputation as also stating he has horrible breath which also questions Mr. wolf hygiene. The principles of libel state whether the meaning of the defendant’s statement is defamatory. If the meaning is defamatory, whether or not the statement can be interpreted to actually have that meaning. This case is similar to John Zenger where he wrote an article slandering the Governor.…

    • 444 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    “Intentional tort disparagement is the publishing of a false statement of a material fact about a business’s product or service” (Kubasek, Browne, Herron, Giampetro-Meyer, Barkacs, Dhooge, & Williamson, 2012).…

    • 446 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The writer opinion is that protecting freedom of speech is now up to people of the Internet age. As institutional gatekeepers lose their power to control information, it becomes easier for self- appointed individual gatekeepers to step in. The common result is barbarous accusations and calls for an apology in response to online content. The authors…

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    chapter 1 assignment

    • 564 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The main difference between libel and slander is how it’s imposed. Libel is a written or recorded statement of facts about someone or business while slander is a spoken defamation of a person ro a business. (Clarkson, Miller, Cross, 2012, p. 119). A libel case deals with false statements that caused harm or damage such as destroying reputation and causing humiliation for the plaintiff. On the other hand slander case involves plaintiff claiming false or misleading statement that was verbally expressed about the plaintiff and it resulted in an economic or monetary loss for the plaintiff.…

    • 564 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Qualified Privilege Essay

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages

    There are four major defenses which can be relied upon defamation, justification, fair comment, absolute privilege; and qualified privilege. (Discuss) Qualified privilege, this exists for the same fundamental purpose as absolute privilege which is to protect those who say defamatory statements in circumstances where the common convenience and welfare of society demand such protection. If we compare absolute privilege and qualified privilege we can see that absolute privilege is limited to some defined occasions. On the other hand, qualified privilege applies to the protection of a wider variety of situations whereby it is in the public interest that individuals are able to comment freely on what they honestly believe to be true in their…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    what is crime

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages

    of a criminal case. If I slander somebody, I might be dragged into court, and I might have…

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics