Preview

Indian Removal Act Justified Essay

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
344 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Indian Removal Act Justified Essay
Equality… for all or for some? In 1830, all of the Indians except for some of the Cherokee signed the Treaty of New Etocha. This treaty, was between a small group of Cherokee and the U.S. government where they agreed to leave. Most of the Cherokee refused to leave their land. The Indian Removal Act of 1830 should not be justified because the Americans and Indians have an abysmal, the americans gave the Indians bad land, and the Indians were there first.
First, the Americans and Indians have an abysmal. They have an abysmal because the Americans cheated the Indians in deals and broke treaties. During the war of 1812, the Americans got mad at Indians for helping the British because the Americans were bad to them. The Indians eventually helped out the Americans during the war even though the Americans treated the Indians bad. …show more content…
The cherokee was the last to move and one reason they didn’t want to leave is because the other tribes that went to the Indian territory got their horses taken and people died from diseases. The place had a lot of land for the people probably because everyone who lived there moved because of thieves. In the eyes of the Americans, the Indians should be thankful that we even gave them land. In the Indians eyes again, why kick us out and give us junk land because we won’t want to move.
Finally, the Indians should stay because they were there first. The Indians had their own government made after the U.S government. The Indians had a peaceful life when the Americans come in and make them sign the treaty. The Americans wanted land so they made the Indians move.
In conclusion, the Indian Removal Act of 1830 should not be justified because the Americans broke treaties and cheated the Indians in deals, the Americans gave the Indians bad land, and the Indians were there first. The had a peaceful life, then the Americans came in and messed it
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Money Should Be Given To Native Americans Essay
    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Money Should Be Given To Native Americans Essay

    In 1830, Native Americans were removed from their lands east of the Mississippi and relocated onto reservations west. The US caused this injustice and to amend this, the US should give money to the Natives. If the Natives got money, they would be able to fix their schools and communities to get better education. The Native Americans were moved off their land when gold was discovered on it. Their rights were ignored and the US took the gold. The US could make up for this by giving some of the money made off the gold back to them. However, some oppose that land should be given to the Natives because it will return the dignity they once had.…

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    2.10 Historian
    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages

    2.10 Historian

    I agree with the statement, “The removal of Native Americans from their lands by the Indian Removal Act of 1830 violated their political, legal, and human rights.” The United States’ government was selfish for themselves with the prospering of themselves; the Indians were very understanding to all the treaties the United States forced them to agree with, until the Indian Removal Act; and the spectators of everything that was happening made the Americans look like enemies.…

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Indian Removal Act Research Paper
    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Indian Removal Act Research Paper

    Having people being treated poorly because of their skin color or their ethnicity today is not socially acceptable but back then, everyone did it. The Indian Removal act was an act created by President Jackson. He had these poor people forced from their property because of their ethnicity. The Indian Removal Act was not justified because the U.S. Government (President Jackson), lied to the Cherokee people about what they promised, President Jackson took away the Cherokee’s rights and the Cherokees had a lot of hardships while they walked the Trail of Tears. The Indian Removal Act was not fair for anyone and shouldn’t have been created in the first place. So many people lost their lives and their rights so it was not justified.…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Trail Of Tears History
    • 1523 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Trail Of Tears History

    Many believed this was a humane solution since the Cherokee could avoid the ever growing encroachment of white settlers (Magliocca 891). However, this law was widely debated due to the question of whether states had the constitutional right to extend their laws over Indians, because it would conflict with treaties that guaranteed Indian sovereignty (Davis 55). Nevertheless, after much debate, Andrew Jackson was able to get congress to pass the Indian Removal Act on May 28, 1930.…

    • 1523 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Indian Removal Research Paper
    • 416 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Indian Removal Research Paper

    More land is benefit for a country of course americans want to make their country grow better so they need more land, so now we gong to talk about should Indians move? Of course that the Cherokee should move,Cause of the threat from the U.S.invaders ,and the U.S. leaders of already signed the Indian removal act,and they move is for avoid more sacrifice of their people, the whole nation.…

    • 416 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Indian Removal Policy
    • 1405 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Indian Removal Policy

    Land disputes and law jurisdiction cases had begun to appear quite frequently in the United States Supreme Court during the time the Indian Policy was put into effect after the war. Congress had to address the situation so they came up with the Indian Policy. It was concluded that, “discovery also gave the discoverer the exclusive right to extinguish Indian title either by purchase or by conquest. Natives were recognized only as temporary occupants of the land, and not as owners (Learn NC). The decision to move the Cherokee Indians to lands west of the Mississippi River, decided by the Jackson administration, was more of a reformulation of the national policy that had been in effect since the 1790’s.…

    • 1405 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Trail Of Tears Case Study
    • 200 Words
    • 1 Page

    Trail Of Tears Case Study

    2. Jackson's reasons for the Indian Removal is that they were in the way of the white people's expansion and that most were starting to break the laws of the land. The Indians should not be removed because it was their land first and it is inhumane.…

    • 200 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Why Should The American Indian Get There Back
    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Why Should The American Indian Get There Back

    My first reason is that indians should get there back First reason is because Native Americans…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Cherokee Tribe Case Study
    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Cherokee Tribe Case Study

    The Cherokee had an agreement on a land cessation in 1819, and it concluded that the Cherokees would cede no more land. Georgia tired to revoke their civil rights so the Cherokee’s had to bring in the United States Supreme Court for protection. “In 1832, when the court ruled in favor of Cherokee sovereignty in Worcester V. Georgia, the state refused to respond to the court’s decision. Furthermore, Georgia went ahead with a land lottery, enacted into law in 1830, that provided for the distribution of Cherokee territory to Georgia citizens…no one seemed to have the power and the will to help the Cherokee.”1 The Georgians were winning leaving little hope for Cherokee…

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Analysis Of The Trail Of Tears
    • 871 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Analysis Of The Trail Of Tears

    Many families lost members along the way. Those who did survive were not in a good condition when they got to the “Indian Territory.” In addition to all of those problems, the Native Americans would have to relearn the land they are now forced to live in. Most of them, if not all, have lived in the same area for their whole life and knew the land very well. They also studied the habits of animals in the area to know the best situation for hunting. The Native Americans did not favor this action, but they were left with either moving to the new land, possibly dying along the way, or defying the demands of the white settlers and most likely being killed by them.…

    • 871 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Racism in America Essay Example
    • 951 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Racism in America Essay Example

    Some of the most infamous acts of racism in the United States occurred in the 1800s and 1900s which involved the discrimination against Indians and African Americans. In the 1800s, Americans believed that the Native Americans should be removed off their land or forced to assimilate into American society. The many Native Americans who chose not to assimilate were forced off their land into “reserves” so they would remain separate from society. “The concept became policy in 1825, with the creation of an Indian Country between the Red and Missouri Rivers… followed by the Removal Act of 1830, leading to the relocation of many eastern tribes. Continuing non-Indian expansion, however, caused the so-called "permanent" Indian Territory to dwindle in size” (Waldman, Carl). The removal act attempted to remove Indians off their land and segregate them from each other and then, “The difference was that instead of one large Indian Country, lands were divided up piecemeal, with tribes confined to separate parcels with specific boundaries” (Waldman, Carl). And because of…

    • 951 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Summary Of Lewis Cass's 'Removal Of The Indians'
    • 266 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Summary Of Lewis Cass's 'Removal Of The Indians'

    The idea of getting the Indians to moves elsewhere came about on May 30, 1830. The government which was Andrew Jackson and his fellow workers came up with a movement called the Indian Removal Act. This act evicted 46,000 Indians from their property and to move west. Nobody liked the Indians and the government never took them serious. The Indian act was great move to the whites because it left 25 million acres of land. Socially the white seen this as a gain because they needed more land to produce food and slavery. Racism played a big part in the Indian Removal Act. This act helps us understand how landscape played a big part in forming the culture and environment people back then had to adopt to. The Indian Act affected us today because we are treated second to white any…

    • 266 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Argumentative Essay: The Indian Removal Act
    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Argumentative Essay: The Indian Removal Act

    ¨All men are created equal,¨ according to the Declaration of Independence. But, based on the government’s actions, this was not the case when it came to Indian Removal. When the government issued the Indian Removal act in 1830, there were two clear sides: one that supported it, and one that despised it. After the Supreme Court ruled against it, the wrongness of it became manifest. However, it still continued. The United States was not justified in enabling the Indian Removal Act.…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Removal of Indian Tribes in 1700
    • 1405 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Removal of Indian Tribes in 1700

    In 1971 the Cherokee tribe was in the process of making treaties with United States. The state of Georgia recognized the Cherokee tribe as a nation allowing them to make their own laws and follow their native customs. In the late 1700’s their land started to be invaded by the white man. The Cherokee Indians began to move to Arkansas. (Historical Context) I believe the Indians were taken advantage of and had no option but to move when their land was taken away from them. Georgia and the United States had no regard for the treaties that were put in place. The treaties changed depending on who was in office at the time, the Indians had no choice but to move and give up their land. United States v. Georgia, Chief Justice John Marshall, stated “the Cherokee nation was a domestic independent nation, and therefore Georgia state law applied to them.” When Georgia continued to press the tribe for their land the “Treaty Party” began to make treaties with the federal government to give up their land. The majority of the tribe disagreed with the New Echota treaty where their land was sold for $5 million dollars and the tribe had to move beyond the Mississippi River. Due to corrupt government and the demands of President Andrew Jackson and President Martin Van Buren in 1838, the Indians were “rounded up” and forced off their land and moved to other states.…

    • 1405 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Andrew Jackson Indian Removeal Policy
    • 1196 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Andrew Jackson Indian Removeal Policy

    Robert V. Remini argues that Andrew Jackson’s Indian Removal Act of 1830 was socially motivated by humanitarian impulses, and that Jackson’s actions where driven by the desire to save the culture and populace of the Native Americans from white settlers into Indian territories. Robert V. Remini points out that Andrew Jackson believed that the only way for Indians to be “protected from certain annihilation” (pg3) was to remove the Native Americans from their land, to expel the Indians from their ancient lands. To a majority of the Americans the Indians were inferior to them and that their culture was “a throw back to a darker age” (pg2). Mr. Remini strongly believed that that President Jackson was only trying to protect the Indians from this mentality and by moving the Indians to the west of the Mississippi this would protect them from the white man. Although the policy of removal was first suggested by President Jefferson as the alternative to the Native Americans, Mr. Remini explains how President Jackson had no hesitation in the belief that this was the right course of action. President Jackson would proposed to the Indians that by moving west he would arranged for the exchange of land in the west for the land in the east, that the Indians that moved to the west would be given land titles and would be compensated for their land. President Jackson insisted that the Indians would not be forced to move, that some could stay if the understood and obeyed…

    • 1196 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More