Preview

Should The Natives Get Their Land Away?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
504 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Should The Natives Get Their Land Away?
Do you know how many problems are caused by taking the Natives land away? I think the natives should get their land back. First reason is money can’t help them their land is more important. In addition to my claim, money can’t buy happiness money won’t fix their emotions when their land was taken away. Third reason it will Improve the tribe's economy, as well as start a "process of healing".

I think the native americans should get their land back, I believe they should because money can’t help them, their land is more important. According to the author “Reparations are not able to fix the damage experienced by our people”. basically its saying that reparations won’t help the American Indians because the damage has already been done but having their land back will help a lot (Article 2). “because that’s not the reason that those places are in such bad shape today, but rather figuring out if we are now willing to spend the money to deal with that past history so we can move forward to a brighter
…show more content…
“That involves investing in early childhood education, fixing the schools in those communities, being willing to work in terms of job creation and job training. Those are serious investments.” (article 1). In addition for some another reason is the money they give the natives is enough for them to survive. The bill, whose total price tag is $1.25 billion, passed by a vote of 257 to 156 and now goes to President Reagan, who has already promised to sign it and "close a sad chapter in American history."(Article 2) In addition for some, last reason we can put this past us and be forgiven. “It seems fair to most of us that we now owe them some form of reparations in order to make up for the past”. This may be true, but in my opinion Natives should get their land instead of money, for the majority, the Natives lives revolve around their land. Land is

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    “If you sign this treaty, you’re not going to ever have to work or hunt again; we’ll take care of you.' Everything will be provided. Every year you’ll get so much money to buy your needs, your pots and pans, but we’ll also have food coming in every month, or once a year for you. The other alternative is: 'We’re going to drive you all the way to the Rocky Mountains where you’re going to starve to death and we’ll never have to worry about you again.” Those were exactly the conditions Indians have to agree with by signing the…

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    1980 Dbq

    • 3003 Words
    • 13 Pages

    "In examining the question how the disturbances on the frontiers are to be quieted, two modes present themselves, by which the object might perhaps be effected; the first of which is by raising an army, and (destroying the resisting] tribes entirely, or 2ndly by forming treaties of peace with them, in which their rights and limits should be explicitly defined, and the treaties observed on the part of the United States with the most rigid justice, by punishing the whites, who should violate the same. In considering the first mode, an inquiry would arise, whether, under the existing circumstances of affairs, the United States have a clear right, consistently with the principles of justice and the laws of nature, to proceed to the destruction or expulsion of the savages.... The Indians being the prior occupants, possess the right of the soil. It cannot be taken from them unless by their free consent, or by the right of conquest in case of a. just war. To dispossess them on any other principle, would be a gross violation of the fundamental laws of nature, and of that distributive justice which is the glory of a nation. But if it should be decided, on an abstract view of the situation, to remove by force the ... Indians from the territory they occupy, the finances of the United States would not at present…

    • 3003 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    No, I do not agree that Georgia and the United States were justified in forcing the Indian tribes to leave their homeland and move to the Oklahoma territory. I believe the Tribes were taken advantage of and abused by the states whenever possible.…

    • 1405 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Dawes Act

    • 377 Words
    • 2 Pages

    With farming, the Indians had to pay taxes. The land was not a choice to get and now they have to pay taxes on it. If the didn’t pay taxes, then the land would be taken away. The Indians shouldn’t have had to pay taxes because they were forced to take control of the land.…

    • 377 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Unfortunately, despite how precisely Indians followed white men’s laws and requirements, the Indian Removal would have eventually transpired. The Five Civilized Tribes shed their Indian traditions and culture to take on the Americans way of life. Indians not only adopted principles in government and agriculture, but also religiously. Despite all of this, whites still wanted to kick Indians out of their lands in order to bring profit to themselves. Even the national government could not terminate the Indian Removal. Through both the United States Constitution and Worcester v. Georgia, the national government declared that states could not operate the removal of Indians. All of this, illustrates the inhumanity and lack of compassion whites had…

    • 147 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Finally, the Indians should stay because they were there first. The Indians had their own government made after the U.S government. The Indians had a peaceful life when the Americans come in and make them sign the treaty. The Americans wanted land so they made the Indians move.…

    • 344 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Removal Act DBQ

    • 1296 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Since the colonization of America, there have been tensions and confrontations between white settlers and Native Americans over territory and civilization. President Andrew Jackson signed the Indian Removal Act in 1830, allowing him to communicate with Native American tribal leaders in order to negotiate their voluntary relocation to Federal reservations west of the Mississippi River. When several tribes refused to relocate, the conflict turned violent and was conducted through the use of militias and military force. Due to this violent conflict and the subsequent relocation of hundreds of thousands of Native Americans, relations between Native Americans and the United States Government have since been strained. Native Americans continually experience higher rates of poverty, fewer opportunities for educational advancement, higher rates of physical and mental illness, as well as general discrimination through social systems and policy. Strained relationships, societal, and economic opportunities have weakened and are less readily available to Native Americans, all factors that can be traced back to the Indian Removal Act.…

    • 1296 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    More land is benefit for a country of course americans want to make their country grow better so they need more land, so now we gong to talk about should Indians move? Of course that the Cherokee should move,Cause of the threat from the U.S.invaders ,and the U.S. leaders of already signed the Indian removal act,and they move is for avoid more sacrifice of their people, the whole nation.…

    • 416 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Prior to the Wounded Knee Massacre, the United States government gave the Native Americans many unfulfilled promises. They seized the lands they previously promised to allow the Native Americans to keep. They promised that they would be respected and indiscriminate in American society and safeguard the peace. They also were guaranteed that their culture and sense of pride would not be lost. None of these promises were kept. Over time, the government took their land and massacred their people. One example would be the Wounded Knee Massacre where many Indians were killed in an event characterized by genocide. It never got better for the Native Americans, and even to this day their sufferings continue.…

    • 622 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is a shame what was done to this group of people as a whole. The history of what has happened to the American Indians and the Alaska Natives may have caused their socioeconomic conditions in a sense. I think that got a bad exchange from the white man. Which causing them to lose their land, family and nation.…

    • 942 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Since the start of The United States of America the colonists and later Americans had to deal with the Natives that were rightfully there first. The federal government’s diplomacy approach with Native Americans during the time periods of 1790 to 1880 and 1880 to 1900 differ in a few ways. During the period of 1790 to 1880 the government participated it removals, treaties, reservations, and even war. In addition, the treaties and acts in this time period that the government approached with, usually ended in the U.S. taking the land of the Native Americans. During the time period of 1880 to 1900 the government’s approach to Native Americans was less involved and really only relied on a few moves to take the land of the Indians. One thing in common with the two time periods is the fact that the Native Americans were not treated fairly.…

    • 1546 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The settlement of $3.4 billion dollars is the largest ever in the history of America. A major problem with the settlement is the amount awarded to a person is based on money generated by their account. The accounts were mismanaged and will show inaccurate amounts of money earned. It is an on going effort to determine how many Native Americans the settlement will effect and how much money they will each…

    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Should the indians get there land back for there right? this is why I think the indians should get there back. First reason is because Native Americans were here first. They gave up their land to us shouldn't we return the favor. The second reason is that The US Supreme Court agrees," the UN Investigator said. If the Black Hills were returned to the tribe, the Reservation would have natural resources, and a way to earn enough money to survive. My third reason is that All these things contribute to the health, economic, and family problems many American Indians experience daily. Still, American Indians have not really asked for reparations. Why?…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Trail Of Tears

    • 870 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Removing the Cherokees from their original home was disgraceful choice made by the United States government. Forcing the Cherokees out of their rightful land just so they could use it for resources they didn’t currently have access to was tragic. Historian Richard White said…

    • 870 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Cherokee should be able to stay because the government said that the land belonged to them and their fathers before them. From the letter it said,“These governments perfectly understood our right to the land and our right of self-government.” and “Our fathers gave it to us as their children.” The Cherokee did not want to give up their land because they had owned the land for generations and the government knew this. The land belonged to them first and they have the right to stay there and not be forced to leave.…

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays