Preview

Trail Of Tears Case Study

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
200 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Trail Of Tears Case Study
1. The Cherokee endured a lot on the trail of tears. They had to suffer from fatigue and had to struggle with giving up their land. They also had to deal with disease and losing their love ones. Finally they also had to deal with the cold and freezing. In conclusion, the Cherokee endured a lot on the trail of tears.

2. Jackson's reasons for the Indian Removal is that they were in the way of the white people's expansion and that most were starting to break the laws of the land. The Indians should not be removed because it was their land first and it is inhumane.

3. The Eminent Domain is the right of a government or its agent to expropriate private property for public use, with payment of compensation. I think this can be a good thing for the
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Age of Jackson Dbq
    • 1307 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Age of Jackson Dbq

    Jackson signed the Indian Removal Act in 1830, dictating that all Indians living in the Deep South had to move to Eastern Oklahoma, because the Indians had something everyone else wanted, land. Jackson says in his First Inaugural Address,“It will be my sincere and constant desire to observe toward the Indian tribes within our limits a just and liberal policy, and to give that humane and considerate attention to their rights and their wants which is consistent with the habits of our Government and the feelings of our people.” Jackson is saying that It will be his genuine and continuous desire towards the Indian tribes, and we want to give them a fair and open policy, and give humane and kind attention to their rights and their wants which is the same with the habits of our government and the feelings of our people. He wants to give the Indian tribes a good policy. Later on, he removes the Indian tribes from their homes in the Deep South and makes them march on the trail of tears, where they relocate to Eastern Oklahoma.…

    • 1307 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Domain Infringes on Personal Property Rights: Damage to Securing Stable Growth in Sovereign Nations, while Bolstering Developing Nations
    • 301 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Domain Infringes on Personal Property Rights: Damage to Securing Stable Growth in Sovereign Nations, while Bolstering Developing Nations

    In the Unites States the Fifth Amendment of the US Constitution imposes limitations on the exercise of eminent domain. In a landmark eminent domain case that was presented to the US Supreme Court in 2005, the limitations have been greatly expanded giving the federal, state and local government the ability to take private land and then sell it to private developers. Eminent domain has always been a tool at the government’s disposal and was used to establish things like the transcontinental railroad. Eminent domain, as described by the Constitution, states that the government must use the land for public use. The public uses clause has been broadened over the years. The United States is not the only country that allows for eminent domain, although called different things the principals are the same. Countries such as the United Kingdom, Ireland, Australia, Canada, South Africa, etc. all allow for land to be taken for “the greater good”. The laws and protections vary greatly. I plan to look at some of the benefits of Eminent Domain as well as the many downsides of eminent domain. I will explore several sovereign nations and how eminent domain has helped and hindered growth, private property rights, and the true cost of exercising eminent domain. I will also explore the use of eminent domain in developing countries, and contrast that to developing countries who have strict law pertaining to property rights.…

    • 301 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Andrew Jackson
    • 383 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Pros And Cons Of Andrew Jackson

    Although Jackson was out of office when the Indian Removal act was actually carried out, he had set its path into motion, and shares just as much credit for the act if not more than his presidential and ideological successor, Martin Van Buren. As Jackson saw it, the tribes were not part of the union, but sovereign nations, so why should they have any sort of protection from the federal government? The is the notable minority as stated earlier. Their land, unfortunately according to Jackson, belonged in and to the states they resided in. Jackson was also a strong supporter of…

    • 383 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Eminent Domain
    • 113 Words
    • 1 Page

    Pros And Cons Of Eminent Domain

    Eminent Domain is the power of government to take private property for “public use”, which is found in the 5th amendment of the Constitution. Eminent Domain has a positive and negative impact when it comes to society and an individual’s life. It has many positive impacts when it comes to the society, eminent domain may bring new schools, roads, and buildings. I do believe that eminent domain should not be used in the taking of private property for commercial use. I support the idea of eminent domain when it comes to the use of public use but oppose of the idea when it comes to uses such as shopping malls and office buildings.…

    • 113 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Trail Of Tears Analysis
    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Trail Of Tears Analysis

    Most people are conscious of the devastating effects The Trail of Tears had on the Cherokee people, some question its necessity and the mindset of President Andrew Jackson to not only let this horrific affair to take lace but to fight tooth and nail for this policy. Despite the plethora of writings in place regarding the injustices that the Native Americans endured during the Trail of Tears very little attention has been given to why the people of that time would allow this forced removal to take place. This paper will analyze the immoral, unconstitutional and illegal engagements that took place during the development of President Andrew Jackson’s Indian Removal Policy as well as the actions instigating the trail of trails and the devastating…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Andrew Jackson's Attitude Towards Native Americans Between 1838 And 1839
    • 335 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Andrew Jackson's Attitude Towards Native Americans Between 1838 And 1839

    In 1838 and 1839 Andrew Jackson from Tennessee was forceful on Indian Removal, and from 1814 to 1824 jackson was instrumental in negotiating nine out of 11 treaties, which had devastated the southern tribes of their eastern lands in the west. So the Cherokee indians were tired of it so they went to the supreme court. The n in 1830 Jackson pushed a whole new piece of legislation called the “Indian Removal Act”. Jackson’s attitude towards the Native Americans came off as rude because he did not like the Indians and he wanted them gone.…

    • 335 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Andrew Jackson Trail Of Tears
    • 298 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Andrew Jackson Trail Of Tears

    The Trail of Tears, a gruesome event taking place in the mid 1800's. Andrew Jackson and his Indian removal Act, it costed the land of the Cherokees of the east Mississippi River to be taken away from them. Due to the land being stolen, the Cherokees had to migrate to the present-day of Oklahoma. With its devastating events such as, Hunger, disease, and exhaustion. Years later,…

    • 298 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Andrew Jackson Dbq: the Democratic President Behaves Like a Dictator
    • 1354 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Andrew Jackson Dbq: the Democratic President Behaves Like a Dictator

    Andrew Jackson was a supporter in Indian removal. However, he also had a soft spot; he adopted a Creek Indian boy named Lyncoya. Jackson didn’t consider Indians as American people; this somewhat made it easier to remove Native Americans from their homeland. Not only this, but he made it voluntary to leave, but if they were within limits of the states, they must be subject to their laws. (Document 8). Jackson also removed Indians from the land of their fathers/people. He didn’t even consider that they might not be familiar with the outside land or may not speak the same language. (Document 9). Generally, Indians were removed…

    • 1354 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of The Indian Removal Act
    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Pros And Cons Of The Indian Removal Act

    Lastly, the Indian Removal Act wasn't justified considering this event lead to the Trail of Tears. after the evacuation of native tribes from their lands, they began a thousand mile journey west of the Mississippi river through harsh climates, limited clothing, and barely enough food to survive; furthermore, more than 5,000 natives died of diseases including smallpox,malaria, and typhus; in addition, luckily, 200 natives survived the journey where they adapted to warm climates and non-profitable soil which also lead to many casualties due to starvation…

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Eminent Domain
    • 744 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Eminent Domain

    Eminent Domain is the government's right under the Fifth Amendment to acquire privately owned property for public use - to build a road, a school or a courthouse. Under eminent domain, the government buys your property, paying you what's determined to be fair market value. In recent years, there has been much debate over the appropriateness of eminent domain, and further its legality in specific instances. The government is allowed to seize personal property for private use if they can prove that doing it will serve what's called "the public good". There have been many cases brought up against the government in attempt to regulate the government's power in seizing private property. There is a political push for reform to the eminent domain laws, including the regulation of compensation, hold outs, relocation assistance, and more generally, minimizing the excessive taking of private land.…

    • 744 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Eminent Domain
    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Eminent Domain

    Eminent Domain is the inherent power of the state to take over a citizen's property for public use without the owner's consent. This is commonly done when the acquisition of property is needed for the completion of a project. These projects can be for transportation such as highways or bridges or even for buildings such as schools or government buildings. This excerpt states that ''The Fifth Amendment to the Constitution says 'nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.' This is a tacit recognition of a preexisting power to take private property for public use, rather than a grant of new power.''160 Eminent domain ''appertains to every independent government. It requires no constitutional recognition; it is an attribute of sovereignty.''(NATIONAL EMINENT DOMAIN POWER) 160 This states that eminent domain is above the Fifth Amendment by the government. Some states first offer compensation for the property before the use of eminent domain but even though compensation is usually a part of this process, the amount paid to these people is far less than what the property is really worth but they must take it since the power of eminent domain will usually force then to give the property up no matter what.…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Trail Of Tears: Indian Removal Of Native Americans
    • 253 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Trail Of Tears: Indian Removal Of Native Americans

    The Trail of Tears was a terrible loss of Native American culture and people. The Trail of Tears is a story about injustice and suffering, but also…

    • 253 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Case Study: Eminent Domain In Michigan
    • 1258 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Case Study: Eminent Domain In Michigan

    Eminent domain is defined by law as the right of a government or its agent to expropriate private property for public use, with due compensation. However, there can be certain cases where the government go too far in their power, breaking apart towns and its people. In the cases of Poletown Neighborhood Council v. The City of Detroit in 1981 and Wayne County v. Hathcock in 2004, we can see eminent domain working well and working poorly in the state of Michigan.…

    • 1258 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Andrew Jackson, First Annual Message to Congress (1829)
    • 1005 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Andrew Jackson, First Annual Message to Congress (1829)

    help the natives. He says, " professing a desire to civilize and settle them, we have…

    • 1005 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Research Paper Outline & Thesis: Eminent Domain
    • 1441 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Research Paper Outline & Thesis: Eminent Domain

    First in support of the government power, these were words written by Sheldon Richman of The Future of Freedom Foundation regarding the eminent domain clause: “But like the ‘public use’ criterion, the requirement of just compensation had two worthy intentions. First, it recognized that a property owner was not a servant of the state. If the government wanted his property, it had to pay him. Second, the compensation requirement would restrain the government. Obviously, if private properties were free for the taking, the government would take much more than if it had to pay for it” (Richman). Richman, like others, has noted what is probably the biggest reason people oppose the power: the eminent domain clause was meant to be limited and respect private property rights. On top of that people, in order to survive, must be able to keep what they produce, and to some extent the domain clause sacrifices one individual for the benefit of others. With that type of power the government can easily choose to violate anyone’s rights. Especially since there is always someone who could turn property into something that would produce more tax…

    • 1441 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More