Preview

How Far Did Sergei Witte Achieve His Aims?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2132 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Far Did Sergei Witte Achieve His Aims?
Sergei Witte served during the early part of Nicholas II’s reign as Minister of Finance. The tsarist government had military objectives through the acceleration of the economy. The Tsar also wanted to acquire more power and catch up with modern neighbour countries, and he knew that the only ways to achieve this were through military strength and through economic strength. Economic expansion meant the improvement of the strength of Russian armed forces, as the growing industry would produce more and better armament. The Minister of Finance took over the huge task of modernising the Russian economy to put it in line with other powers of the West. Witte realised that Russia had fallen behind countries like Britain and Germany economically and industrially and their development inspired him.

Principally, Witte aimed to modernise Russia and make it more powerful. He believed in economic development through state capitalism, which meant using the autocratic power to make radical changes in the economy. He also thought that it was possible to combine Western technology with Russian autocracy to sustain the tsar’s government through economic advance. As we can see, his work was greatly focused on the economy. During the 1890’s there was a period referred to as ‘the great spurt’ due to the enormous growth of industry in the country. To achieve this growth, Witte had to put into practice several policies. He realised that due to Russia’s backwardness, the country lacked the main factors that were necessary for industrialisation and growth to happen. There was no capital, no entrepreneurs, no transport infrastructure to increase industrial mobility and mobility in general, no technical experts etc.… Russia had a minuscule business class and the majority of Russian peasants had limited mobility which stopped migration and therefore prevented them from joining the workforce in new manufacturing industries. Further on, Russia did not have sufficient funds to invest in economic

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Russia economy in terms of industry fluctuated over the period from 1855-1964. It is key to note that under all the leaders, industrialisation and modernisation was always seen as an essential economic aim. Under Alexander II, with Reutern as his Minister of finance who adopted an approach that revolved around continued railway construction, attraction of foreign expertise and foreign investment capital. As a result modernisation and expansion occurred within the staples as well as newer industries which show the impact that alexander II made on industry. Reutern achieved a sevenfold increase in the amount of railway and the capacity of railway to carry break bulk at speed increased which gave a major boost to industrial output Russia seemed to be finally moving towards industrialisation and keeping up with the West. This approach was similar under Nicolas II who also managed to have a great impact on Russia’s industrial economy. This was through the work of Sergei Witte whom at the time of his appointment the Russian economy still resolved predominantly around agricultural production further showing that under Alexander II impacts was limited. Witte continued the idea of foreign expertise as well as taking out foreign loans, raising taxes and interest rates to boost available…

    • 2039 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This production, bolstered Russian industry and the military. The Tsar designed new guns, made both army and navy professional, standing units, and governments along with military promotions become based on merit instead of bloodline. Still, he wanted more than…

    • 192 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Nicholas II being the last tsar of the Romanov dynasty that lasted for over 300 years, is accountable for the fall of the Romanovs in 1917, however, there are various other reasons too that involved in the ultimate fall of tsarism in Russia in February 1917. While Nicholas’s indecisiveness played a major role in portraying his negligence, the other factors that involved the fall of tsarism were, the declining economic standards and the growth of political opposition along with Nicholas II’s penultimate absence when he was most needed in his country, due to the involvement in the first world war, which was another mistake made by the tsar.…

    • 313 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Between 1750 and 1914, England, Germany, and Western Europe were all expanding. England was gaining land and trust in the Middle East, Germany was becoming an established nation, and Western Europe was thriving due to the Industrial Revolution. After recognizing all of this, Russia decided it was time for reform or be left in the dust. This caused major changes in Russia’s labor system such as emancipation of the serfs and industrialization to keep up with the changing world. Although they were going through these changes, there were continuities such as the treatment of the serfs and the type of reform they were doing.…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To what extent did Russia undergo economic and political reform in the years 1906 – 1914?…

    • 1040 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tsar Nicholas II’s lack of military experience and inability to rule the throne all together, additionally contributed to the devastating outcome of WW1 on Russia. “A quick intelligence, a cultivated mind, method and industry in his work, an extraordinary charm that attracted all who came near him- the Emperor Nicholas had not inherited his father’s commanding personality nor the strong character and prompt decision which are so essential to an autocratic ruler...” stated Sir G. Buchanan, British ambassador to Russia in 1910, emphasizes how the urban lower classes were not the only ones unsatisfied with the Tsar Nicholas…

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    'His reign saw Imperial Russia go from one of the foremost great powers of the world to an economic and military disaster.' - Anna Yudina…

    • 1325 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    27

    • 610 Words
    • 4 Pages

    question for the Russians was whether or not they could grow their economic gains while…

    • 610 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The last years of imperial Russia were characterized by a paradox. Externally, Russia appeared very strong. There had been substantial growth economically and her military force was large. But internally,…

    • 3824 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nicholas I faced a multitude of problems when he ascended to the throne in 1825, first and foremost of all these was the Decembrist Revolution by Russian officers. Second was Russia’s crippling economic backwardness, and the slowly crumbling social systems of the old autocracy. Due to Nicholas the I Slavophil outlook on economics he had all but refused to modernise the Russian economy instead leaving it to sit stagnant whilst Western economies of Britain and France thundered ahead. This neglect of industry was keenly felt during the Crimean War where the allied forces of Britain and France thoroughly defeated and embarrassed the Tsars armies. The Russian army was terribly equipped, only capable of supplying 50%…

    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Between 1800 and 1939 Russia underwent through a severe regime change. The people of Russia were in a state of great economic disparity, and the lower class faced hunger, poverty, etc. The lower class had very little of the grain, land, and fiscal control that was available in Russia, such pretext of large income disparity gaps and unbalanced control of GDP were the pre-requisites se in place for the takeover of socialism. And such is what happened. Within this time period Russia went through a proletariat revolution of communism aiming have the workers of the world unite and free themselves from capitalist oppression to create a world run by and for the working class. However even though they underwent this major social-economic change, conditions in Russia stayed around the same. We still saw that Russia was under leadership of a Totalitarian authority. And maintained the same economic conditions where the consumer-based market never developed and the population was largely rural and the economy was agricultural based.…

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    ss notes

    • 1541 Words
    • 7 Pages

    TIME LINE 1855-1881 Alexander II established the zemstvos: a form of local self government First Russian westernization attempt 1861- Emancipation of Serf: was incomplete serfs were left to pay for their land… redemption payments Mir: village community 1863-1864 reforms of law, education and local government 1881 Alexander II assassinated 1881-1894 Alexander III instituted an era of repression and reaction denounced democracy, free press blood revolution police force Okharana 1891 famine • crops failed and there were no reserves; Russia had great famine The Witte System: Railroads, Industry, Tax the Peasants He wanted to expand Russian industry and develop its economy Building railroads will stimulate the growth of other industries Results of Witte System: o Growth of industry at 8% per year…

    • 1541 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Unlike Sergei Witte before him, Stolypin understood the importance of the peasantry; they had made up 80% of the Russian population. Russia had undergone a “rural crisis” in the late nineteenth century and had deepened due to bad harvests in the 1890’s. Their ways of farming were very inefficient as they relied on…

    • 1050 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    History

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages

    I believe that one of the main reasons for the Tsar’s abdication and the collapse of the Romanov rule was the poor state which Russia was in. Russia’s economy was at the worst it had ever been. The economy was far worse than other countries in the War. There were millions of peasants in Russia who had very limited amount of money. With such a limited amount of money, many peasants were unable to buy food, and drink to help them to survive. Peasants believed that they weren’t getting rewarded fairly for the work which they were doing. The upper classes’ benefit greatly due to work done by the Peasants. This created a negative atmosphere around Russia and helped fuel the need for a change. Peasants wanted change; they wanted to be rewarded more for their efforts at work. Russia was in an economic crisis. They had borrowed a huge amount of money from capital countries in order to fuel Russia’s war effort. This was a problem for Russia because they simply didn’t have the money to repay these countries. During the war the country had suffered inflation. Prices had risen dramatically for everyday items such as bread. The country was suffering and the Russian people’s families were dyeing in a war which wasn’t being funded. The Russian people were bound to be discontent and they only had one person to blame and that was the Tsar.…

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When in power, Stalin realized that if Russia was to become a key player in the global market, the country needed to industrialize rapidly and increase production. To do this, Stalin introduced the Five-year Plans. Stalin's ultimate aim was to expand industrial production. For this, he developed three Five-year Plans between 1928 and 1938.…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays