Preview

George Elwell The Problem Of Evil

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
828 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
George Elwell The Problem Of Evil
The Problem of Evil

To present the topic of “the problem with evil,” without acknowledging there is a God can be confusing. I think one of the best questions that you could ask is, why does God allow evil being a perfect and loving God (Elwell, pg 413 There are different types of evil that are allowed in this world. The first is moral evil, which began in the garden of Eden when Eve ate the fruit off the tree and deliberately disobeyed God in an act of sin and evil (Gen. 3)(Elwell, pg 412). The next is natural evil; this is explained mainly in natural disasters such as, earthquakes, hurricanes, tornadoes, and disease. Elwell writes, “natural evil is the consequence of moral evil,” then goes onto explain that natural evil is not distinct
…show more content…
. . therefore through their act of disobedience Adam and Eve sin entered the world, and because of this we were and are all born sinners (Elwell, pg 434). There are many reasons why we suffer here on earth. First mentioned by Elwell is a quote from Job 4:7-9 where God will use pain and affliction as a means of judgment (pg 883) Second, the Bible teaches that sometimes pain and affliction will help people turn back to God, or bring a person to salvation (Israel in the tribulation Zech 12 (pg 883). Lastly, Elwell says that sometimes it will be by means of punishment or chastisement and used Psalm 94:12-13, and also Hebrews 12:6 (Elwell, pg …show more content…
The problem with the free will theodicy is that not all theologies are consistent or hold identical positions (Elwell, pg 1184). Elwell also states, that the “free will defense is an inappropriate answer to the problem of moral evil, since the notion of freedom involved in the free will defense is incompatible with the freedom involved in the Calvinistic system (Elwell, pg 1184).” Elwell writes about another theodicy which is the soul building theodicy, this theodicy rests upon a rationalist theology (Elwell, pg 1186) John Hick asks a good question by saying, “What sort of environment would be most conducive to soul-building?” I feel that would be good reason for sin to be present in everyday life, which allows God to show His mercy and grace. Elwell also writes about the fact of having an Edenic paradise would currently take away from a world to win souls to Christ. With Hick’s theology on the subject, Elwell notes that this would not be accepted by some as a whole due to the way it is outlined (Elwell, pg 1186). The intent of a consistent theodicy is to avoid self-contradiction (Elwell, pg 1187). For example, if you write a theodicy explaining evil and try to justify it by

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Evil comes in as the obstacle coarse in the way of the ultimate prize. After all, with such a great goal, it shouldn't be easy. Though this doesn't really answer the question of where evil came from, or why God allows it. Irenaeus believes that we chose it when humanity fell in Creation. That justifies moral evil. But what of natural evil? Why did God want this journey to take place in such a hazardous environment, with earthquakes and pestilence, and in such frail form, which is susceptible to such dangers? Hick's response is that moral and spiritual development does not take place in a static environment but comes as the result of challenge and struggle and…

    • 935 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I will know defend the claim that evil is a degree of wrong, as well as how it isn’t qualitatively distinct. Eve Garrard argues that evil is the intent to create harm as well as how silence plays a role in this. However, philosopher Luke Russell, discusses how, “Garrard, refuses to modify her account by adding the condition that evil actions must be harmful” (). Russell later states that extreme harm doesn’t have to be a contributor of evil. In a sense, it has been there but it not always is. This supports my initial argument since it can be compared to how evil is an extent of wrong, as well as how a harm does not need to be a contributor of wrong. An example of this can be seen in certain religious groups, such as the Ancient Civilizations…

    • 283 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The problem of evil refers to the question of how to reconcile the existence of evil with an omnibenevolent, omniscient, and omnipotent God.…

    • 370 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The problem with the logical problem of evil is plain and simple to what you’re reading. The word logical is the key. We as people like to think that suffering and evil will lead to build morality and character. But where is the proof? A theist could also say that you can prevent suffering and evil by your own freedom and choices. But clearly that isn’t the case and anything could happen at any given moment. A counter-example is if a man was walking on the sidewalk and gets hit by a car from behind, and suffers and dies slowly. How can you prove that this incident was for the greater good? If there was an omniscient being how could he not prevent this or let him die instantly instead of suffering? That is the evidential problem of evil’s argument.…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thesis: The conflict behind the idea of evil is why a perfect God would allow evil to exist on earth.…

    • 998 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Natural evil came from the loss of order in nature, moral evil came from the knowledge of good and evil that humanity had discovered through disobedience because they choose the lesser good. Those who follow God will live an eternal life however those who reject God would suffer eternal torment.…

    • 547 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Chapter 13 Essay

    • 1423 Words
    • 6 Pages

    As I mentioned before religiously I was told the free will defense although I didn’t know it was a philosophy idea as well. There are many different ideas trying to show that both statements are true: There is an omnipotent and omnibenevolent God. And there is evil (Jensen 312). One explanation is that God is limited (Jensen 312). Another is his ways cannot be scrutinized (Jensen 313). Leibniz proposed that a perfect world is not logically possible (Jensen 314). Tennant said that evils are a necessary by-product of nature (Jensen 314). Another idea is that evil is a way to grow as a person a sort of therapy (Jensen 323). Some like John Stuart Mill proposed “radical surgery” by saying that God is not omnipotent (Jensen 311). Alvin Plantinga defended God from being responsible for evil by saying that for moral good to be present humans must be capable of moral evil as well (Jensen 321). My favorite thought in this chapter is from John Hick and his writings on Irenaeus a Christian theologian. Hick suggests that man was created imperfect and immature creature who needed to go through a moral development and growth before his final stage of perfection that was intended for him by the creator. I love this idea because the Bible makes man a sinner who destroyed his perfection and then plunged into sin and misery for the remainder of his existence (Jensen…

    • 1423 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    What is the Problem of Evil? Is it reasonable to believe a Perfectly Good God, or even a Good God exists if there is suffering in the world?…

    • 1612 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Intro: In this article, I first presented the Free Will argument. Then I showed how it fails by questioning the necessity of natural evils. After that, I defended my response against a likely rebuttal.…

    • 1005 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Free Will Defense is an attempted solution to the problem of moral evil. Human beings are gifted with free will by God as a condition for genuine morality, trust, love, and the like, though it also makes possible the introduction of moral evil into the world. There are various questions that are asked with the question of God. Many ask questions like- why did God give humans the ability of free will knowing that they will abuse it? Is free will a condition for real humanhood? Could God have made us free and unable to sin? These questions that are frequently asked are left unanswered. People believe all different things.…

    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Augustinian theodicy was constructed by Saint Augustine (345-430 AD) and is the main traditional Christian response to the problem of evil. The Augustinian Theodicy holds the view that because God is perfect, the world was created free of imperfections. God cannot be blamed for evil and suffering since God didn't create them, on the contrary, evil comes from angels and humans who act less than perfectly and choose through free will to sin and disobey God. Natural evil is an appropriate punishment because humanity destroyed the natural order, we have all sinned so we all deserve to be punished. Quite different from the Augustinian theodicy, the Irenaean theodicy which was created by Saint Irenaeas (130-202 AD) and later developed by John Hicks and Richard Swinburne doesn't see the world as created all-good and describes an almost opposite process compared with the Augustinian theodicy. It holds that humans were initially created as immature and imperfect beings; they were created in the image of God, but not His likeness. Mankind's goal is to achieve that likeness. Such perfection and likeness of God cannot be ready-made, it can only be developed through free will choices, and we can only become moral and develop through making moral judgments. Natural evil has to be…

    • 1488 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Outline The Problem Of Evil

    • 2599 Words
    • 11 Pages

    The problem of evil is usually seen as the problem of how the existence of God can be reconciled with the existence of evil in the world. It's regarded as a logical problem, because it is based on the apparent contradiction involved in holding onto three incompatible beliefs. This being that God is omnipotent, that God is wholly good and that evil exists in the world. The fact that evil exists in the world constitutes the most common objection to the belief in the existence of the omnipotent (all powerful),…

    • 2599 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why God Allows Evil

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Swinburne defends the view that the existence of evil in the world is consistent with the existence of an omnipotent, perfectly good God. Not only are they consistent, he argues, but the amount of good in the world requires the possibility of substantial evil. He begins his argument by distinguishing moral evil (which comes from humans acting in morally bad ways) from natural evil (pain and suffering that comes from anything other than human action with predictable outcome), both of which are necessary for the world's good.…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Moral Evil Research Paper

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Some atheists rebut that free will can only explain the moral evils from human, but it cannot explain the natural evils (suffering), such as natural disasters, congenital diseases. The natural evils bring a lot of sufferings and damages to the human beings, and they are not due to the free will of people. However, free will can provide an explanation for natural disasters. Natural disasters exist because of the original…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Problem Of Evil Essay

    • 1546 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The problem of evil may be described as a theory or conclusion that there is no God of the universe. Although the teleological argument can prove the existence of any God, the problem of evil simply states that if there was a God who was a “Perfect Being” then there should be no evil in the universe. According to the power point of the problem of evil, it says if God was a “Perfect Being,” that means he would be omniscient, omnipotent, morally good and the creator of the universe. With this being said, the argument is constructed in the way that proves God does not exist. The power point summarizes the idea that God being omniscient makes him see the future allowing him to…

    • 1546 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays