Preview

Fourth and Fifth Amendment

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
918 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Fourth and Fifth Amendment
The Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution reads: The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized (The Free Dictionary 2013)
In 1973, the Supreme Court case Cady v. Dombrowski created the “community caretaking exception,” which allows an unconstitutional warrantless search of an automobile where the search is conducted by law enforcement in an attempt to protect the general public from harm, as opposed to a search conducted during the course of a criminal investigation. (Circuit Splits 2013) This is an exception can be used in crisis situations for the greater good.
The case goes as the following: In the town of Cady in Wisconsin, police officers searched Dombrowski’s car for a handgun. During the time of the search Dombrowski was in a coma in a local hospital after a motor vehicle accident. The police officers knew that he was a Chicago police officer and was required to carry his revolver with them at all times. (Call 2012)
During the initial search Dombrowski’s revolver was not found in a search of the rental car he was driving at the time of the accident. The police returned to the rental car to look again for the service revolver, so it would not end up in the wrong hands. (Call 2012) Through this secondary search evidence of a possible crime was revealed to police officers. Information resulted in the police discovering the body of a murder victim and evidence linking Dombrowski to the killing. (Call 2012) Dombrowski was charged with murder by the police resulting from the search. This case was the foundation of these types of searches being justified by police officers during special circumstances.
The Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution reads: "No person shall



References: Call, J. (2012). The Community Caretaker Function Exception to the Warrant Requirement Retrieved from: http://www.vachiefs.org/vapleac/vplb/7-1/aug12_caregiver.htm Circuit Splits. (2012). New Exception Allowing Warrantless Home Entries Headed to the High Court? Retrieved from: http://www.circuitsplits.com/community-caretaker-exception/ Salzberg, K. (2006). The dog that didn’t bark: Assessing damages for valid regulatory takings. Retrieved from: http://lawlibrary.unm.edu/nrj/46/1/05_salzberg_dog.pdf The Free Dictionary. (2013) Fourth Amendment. Retrieved from: http://legal- dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Fourth+Amendment

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The facts of the case stated that on August 2, 2009, Riley, who belonged to the one of the gangs of San Diego, California, and others shot at a rival gang member while driving past them. The shooters got into Riley’s car and drove away. Then, twenty days later on August 22, 2009, the police pulled Riley over driving a different car because of his expired license registration tags. They found that his driver’s license had been suspended. Police searched his car before impounding it. During the search, the police located two guns in the car and then arrested Riley for possession of said guns. Riley had his cell phone in his pocket at…

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In Bridgeport, Connecticut around 2:15 a.m in the morning, Sergeant Connolly received a tip from an informant that a suspect who was sitting in a vehicle early in the morning at a high crime area carrying narcotics and a gun at his waist. After calling for backup, Sergeant Connolly approached to the vehicle and tapped on the widow and asked Robert Williams (the suspect) to open the door. Instead of opening the door, Robert Williams rolled down the window. At this time, Sergeant Connolly reached in and removed a fully loaded gun from the Robert Williams’s waist. Also, the gun was not visible from outside the car, but it exactly where the informant said it was. After arresting Robert Williams for illegal possession of a handgun, heroin and a…

    • 148 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ken Krooks Case Study

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Each time a police officer chooses to make an arrest, they demonstrate whether or not they practice the proper discretion that their career field expects of them. For the particular case involving Ken Krook, a young man who had attempted to rob a liquor store, while holding the store clerk at gun point. While Ken fled the scene, a responding officer had been notified on behalf of the specific crime that had taken place following a veg description of the individual. After noticing an individual who seemed to fit the description of Ken Kook, the officer ran after the criminal, eventually making an arrest. This case brings up the issue involving what is and is not a proper use of discretion, and whether the arrest of Ken Krook was done lawfully.…

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Chris Finish is a licensed driver who has owned his car for about six months. On the night of his arrest, he picked up Josh Kings at approximately 8:00 p.m. While double parked outside a store 24 police notice an expired inspection sticker on the defendants vehicle. the officer stopped them at approximately 10:30 p.m. After questions them for a bit the officer notices a handgun under the passenger seat. Both men denied any knowledge of the gun. The defendants lawyer moved for a directed verdict, The motion was denied, Chris is now appealing his conviction. John Kings has not been seen sense the night of the arrest.…

    • 1086 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    On February 05, 2017 at approximately 9:03 P.M., Detective Christopher Liggett and I, Detective Stacy Stark interviewed WALTER G. BAUER. The purpose of the interview was to ascertain BAUER’s recollection and/or involvement of the alleged self-inflicted firearm shooting of Linda Wilson. BAUER was given proper identification of who we were and the agency we represent while at the incident scene located at 38 Dustin Dr. Carbondale, Illinois 62902. BAUER came to the Jackson County Sheriff’s Office voluntarily and agreed to the interview. Prior to BAUER entering the patrol office interview room, the audio/video recording device was activated by Detective Liggett.…

    • 224 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    One officer testified that he stopped appellant because the situation "looked suspicious, and we had never seen that subject in that area before."…

    • 401 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    On Tuesday, October 25, 2016, at 0504 hours, Lieutenant Dana Jackson, Sergeant James Lesher, and I made contact with Officer Dennis Hutchins and his attorney, William “Bill” James in the Homicide conference room located at the 12th Street Substation. Officer Hutchins was one of two first responding officers to arrive at 514 E. 8th, where an officer involved shooting occurred. Sergeant Lesher advised Officer Hutchins of his Miranda Rights and his counsel Mr. James and I signed the form as witnesses. Officer Hutchins waived his Miranda Rights and provided a statement in reference to the incident that occurred at 514 E. 8th Street.…

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Early in the morning, on October 5th 2002, five Edmonton Police officers, including Constable (Cst.) A. Normand (No. 1809), Cst. P. Blais (No. 1900), Cst. R. Sparreboom (No. 2309), Cst. R. Foote (Resigned) and Cst. Mike Wasylyshen responded to a complaint of an attempted car theft on Abbosttfield road. When the officers arrived on scene they immediately demanded that the four occupants exit the vehicle, without first running a licence plate search (Edmonton sun, 2012). Three of the four occupants exited the vehicle leaving only Randy Fryingpan left asleep on the backseat (Edmonton Sun, 2012). Randy Fryingpan had been unresponsive to Constable Mike Wasylyshen’s demands to exit the vehicle as a result of alcohol consumption. Cst. M. Wasylyshen decided to Taser Randy…

    • 1738 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Salinas V Texas

    • 1542 Words
    • 5 Pages

    On the morning of December 18, 1992, two brothers were shot and killed in their Houston home. Police were called by a neighbor who heard the gunshots, and then seen a “dark colored” car fleeing from the house. It was later found out that defendant, Genovevo Salinas, was at the residence where the murders took place the night before December 18th. When officers went to Salinas’ house, they arrived to a dark blue vehicle that matched the witness’s account of the car. Police asked Salinas a few questions, he let the officers have his shotgun, and then the police asked him to come down to the station to answer a few questions so they could “clear him as a suspect.”…

    • 1542 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Study Analysis

    • 727 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Officer Smith did not locate a weapon during the pat down but he still had reasonable suspicion to believe that the vehicle or the driver may have been involved in the murder of a police officer and reasonable suspicion that there may be a weapon inside the vehicle but because he did not locate a weapon during the pat down search he did not have probable cause to search the vehicle so he proceeded with his traffic stop.…

    • 727 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    On May 23, 1957, police officers in a Cleveland, Ohio suburb received information that a suspect in a bombing case, as well as some illegal betting equipment, might be found in the home of Dollree Mapp. Three officers went to the home and asked for permission to enter, but Mapp refused to admit them without a search warrant. Two officers left, and one remained. Three hours later, the two returned with several other officers. Brandishing a piece of paper, they broke in the door. Mapp asked to see the “warrant” and took it from an officer, putting it in her dress. The officers struggled with Mapp and took the piece of paper away from her. They handcuffed her for being “belligerent.”…

    • 926 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    I approached the vehicle and had Martin step out of the vehicle. I asked if there was anything illegal and he replied no. I asked if he had any objections to me searching his vehicle and he said that he did not have any and said “go ahead”. I conducted a pat down of Martin and found no weapons or contraband. I conducted a pat down of Metcalf and removed a small pocket knife from him and held it for safe keeping. A pat down of Marrujo yielded no weapons or contraband.…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Fourth Amendment protects against illegal search and seizures. This means that a U.S. citizen cannot have themselves, homes and/or possessions searched or confiscated by law enforcement without a legal warrant. It pretty much protects citizen’s privacy. But there are positive and negative effects from this. It protects the citizen’s from law enforcement from searching on the spot without legal documentation authorizing it. On the other hand, thou, it could help criminals dispose of evidence while a judge signs a warrant. The magistrate or judge issues the warrants for arrest and search and seizure not the police officer.…

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    The Exclusionary Rule

    • 2371 Words
    • 10 Pages

    This paper will present the Exclusionary Rule and the original intentions for its enactment. It will discuss the importance of the rule and how it is a protection against an unlawful search and seizure and a violation of the rights provided by the Fourth Amendment. Also, this document will display the history of the Exclusionary Rule, with its first appearance in the case, Boyd v. United States in 1886. Weeks v. United States will show a better-established, stronger version of the exclusionary rule. Another expansion of the rule will be described by the Mapp v. Ohio case. In this paper, I will also state and describe the four primary exceptions to the exclusionary rule: Inevitable Discovery Doctrine, Valid Independent Source, Harmless Error, and the Good Faith Exception. I will subsequently describe the possible abuse of these exceptions and the complications with the exceptions. The document will examine statistical data regarding the exclusionary rule and conclude with my personal opinions regarding the exclusionary rule and its exceptions.…

    • 2371 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Fifth Amendment

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In 1966, there was a supreme case called Miranda v. Arizona which the Supreme Court ruled that the fifth amendment privilege againest self incrimination requires law enforcement to advise a suspect that before a custodial interrigation, a suspect must be informed of both his or her privileges against incriminating oneself and to obtain an attorney. Miranda warnings must be given before any questioning by law enforcement officials.…

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays