Preview

For What Reason Is the Problem of Evil a Problem for Religious Believers?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
650 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
For What Reason Is the Problem of Evil a Problem for Religious Believers?
a)For what reason is the Problem of Evil a problem for religious believers? (9)

Probably the most powerful reason against the existence of The Classical God of Theism (hereafter referred to as God) is evil and suffering in the world. The problem of evil is an ‘a posterori’ argument, established from experience based on empirical senses. It is also synthetic as evil and suffering can be seen around us daily. There are a number of possible reasons for the problem of evil and why it causes a problem for religious believers, making it an inductive argument also. In his book Philosophy of Religion John Hick defined evil and suffering as “physical pain, mental suffering and moral wickedness”
“The Rock of Theism” is what David Hume called the Problem of Evil as it is a strong argument for atheists to use against the existence of God and such a hard one for theists to address. The challenge of evil is the ultimate challenge to believe in God as it can’t be solved. The problem of evil causes problems for religious believers as it presents four problems, a theological problem as it challenges the nature of God, a philosophical problem as the believer has to accept conflicting claims, a diverse problem as evil comes in different forms with each requiring its own explanation and finally a challenging problem as the existence of evil and suffering is real and happening every day.
As there is more than one type of evil that also causes problems for religious believers as God didn’t just create one evil but multiple ones. Moral evil is “all evil caused deliberately by humans doing what they ought not to do” (Richard Swinburne) e.g. murder, terrorism, war whereas natural evil is “the evil that originates independently of human actions” (John Hick) e.g. volcanoes, famine, disease. Leibniz coined the term ‘metaphysical evil’, which is tracing back the evil (moral and natural) to their ultimate cause.
Monists claim that the universe is a single harmonious unity that is good

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    In fact McCloskey places the bar even lower by referring to the “proofs of” rather than “arguments for” God’s existence, thereby overstating the Theist’s claim. With respect to the “proofs” for God’s existence that McCloskey attempts to deal with, namely the Cosmological and Teleological Arguments, McCloskey offers trivial objections that are easily answered. With respect to arguments for God’s non-existence, McCloskey offers the logical form of the problem of evil which, while rich in rhetoric, does not contain enough logic to necessitate its title. McCloskey ends his article with a pragmatic justification of Atheist, stating that Atheism is more comforting that Theism; a point that is stark in its irrelevance.…

    • 2161 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Theology 202 Essay 1

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Short Essay on the Problem of Evil The question of evil is a common hot button topic among atheists and non-Christians who attempt to disprove Christianity. They argue that an omnipotent and omniscient God cannot exist in a world with so much evil. The argument is used by them to try to prove that Christianity is “internally self-contradictory and thereby to be rejected.” Many claim that a benevolent and caring God would certainly not create evil or allow it to flourish in the world that He created. So, the problem of evil is how to explain that there can be a perfect, all-powerful, and all-loving God that exists in a world with so much moral and natural evil.…

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    From a pantheist view, the presence of evil is a problem because they view evil and suffering as illusions created by the human mind. However, evil cannot merely be a reflection that someone can conjure up. This view does not fit with the actual experience of the world or of evil. Furthermore, the belief that people suffer…

    • 702 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    One burning and enduring problem in philosophy to which we have given considerable examination is the question of the existence of God--the superlative being that philosophers have defined and dealt with for centuries. After reading the classic arguments of St. Anselm and St. Thomas Aquinas, the contentious assertions of Ernest Nagel, and the compelling eyewitness accounts of Julian of Norwich, I have been introduced to some of the most revered and referenced arguments for and against God's existence that have been put into text. All of them are well-thought and well-articulated arguments, but they have their holes. The question of God's true existence, therefore, is still not definitively answered and put to rest; the intensity of this debate probably never will mitigate. Many theologians and academics honestly admit that no matter what any philosopher may assert regarding this topic, whether or not a certain person believes in God's existence is a question of faith and nothing more.…

    • 1537 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    It goes without question, that human beings will always question the existence of “God”. Whether these questions are formed in support or denial of an omnipresent creator they are important in helping shape our morality. H J McCloskey and his article “On Being and Atheist” is very critical of theists. It thus presents several arguments on how believers are incorrect in their belief in “God”, cosmological and teleological. McCloskey also focus’s on the existence of evil and how one can find comfort in atheism when facing evil.…

    • 1881 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Response Paper

    • 1875 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Response Paper H. J. McCloskey, a renowned philosopher in the mid 20th century, wrote a provocative article in 1968 titled, “On Being an Atheist”. McCloskey argues for atheism as the preferred and better belief system based upon his refutation of the theistic arguments. He argues against the existence of God by attempting to refute the cosmological and teleological arguments; as well he endeavours to discredit a God based upon the presence of evil. In doing this, he extends the boundaries for arguing God, whilst opening the floor to debate free will and the apparent comfort of the atheistic belief system. However, through careful analysis of the arguments for God, and an insight into the mysterious free will that God has given man; we see that a theistic belief is logically more sound and preferred.…

    • 1875 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Classical Theistic Conception of God states that there is a unique intelligent being that created the universe and that being is wholly perfect, omnipotent, omniscient, and omni-benevolent. In connection with the question of whether belief in a being that satisfies this definition is ever grounded in evidence and argument there are three arguments to consider. These three arguments are the ontological argument, the cosmological argument, and the teleological argument. Each provides separate ideas in proving the existence of a being that satisfies the Classical Theistic Conception of God.…

    • 751 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Evil and Suffering Rs

    • 1852 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Evil and Suffering Part A) 'Evil and suffering is the result of a malevolent God' discuss the problem of evil and suffering in light of this quote. (6 marks)…

    • 1852 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Why Does God Allow Evil?

    • 1771 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Adam George Philosophy 101 Fall 2009 “The Problem of Evil” Many people dispute the true intentions of God, himself, since the beginning of mankind. Opposing and concurring arguments can be just as primitive. Regardless of personal perspective on any indefinite theory, it is undeniable that the controversy between good and evil will inevitably exist. Two dominant philosophers discussed in “The Problem of Evil” are Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz and David Hume. Both of these authors discuss interesting motives from both sides of the issue: why and why not God should allow evil.…

    • 1771 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The question of whether there is a God has been debated by many philosophers, religious experts, and even your average citizens. Many of those people have attempted to argue why God is or is not real. This paper is going to present two different arguments by the philosophers: Robin Collins and William Rowe. The first argument by Collins is an argument for the existence of God, who designed our incredibly complex universe. The explanation of Collin’s argument will be followed by Rowe’s argument against the existence of God, which is in relation to intense suffering that exists in this world. With those two arguments at hand, the question is, are the conclusions compatible?…

    • 1407 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Does the existence of evil in our world disprove God’s existence? March 23, 2011 The argument of the problem of evil contends that the existence of an omniscient, omnibenevolent, and omnipotent God is incompatible with the existence of evil in the world, which can be observed in war, genocide, and human suffering. One could respond to this argument by stating that human evil is a result of free will, which is the God-given ability to make decisions which are either good or evil. In this way, God does not directly cause evil but rather creates the possibility for evil to occur as a natural consequence of human free will. The occurence of natural disasters; such as floods, or excessive pain and suffering brought about by natural disease or hunger, stands in the way of the view that God does not directly cause evil. One could respond to this objection with the claim that these natural evils are “a necessary condition for the highest moral virtue,” (Campbell 287) and that without these evils, virtues such as compassion and bravery are impossible. As a result, it can be concluded that not only is the existence of evil compatible with the idea of an all-loving God, but evil is in fact necessary for moral perfection; which consists in doing “God’s will which always embraces the intrinsically good”(Lewis 88).…

    • 1940 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Irenaean theodicy argues that part of human growth is suffering and an evil nature, which guides us to God. However, the Death of God model argues the exact opposite. The Death of God model argues that evil cannot be an instrument of God and therefore, God has to be dead. Strengths of the Death of God model include the view that evil is not an instrument of God and the rejection of the traditional God that intervenes on Earth. The view that evil is not an instrument of God allows people to place hope in their God. If one saw their God as creating evil, they would not find hope and comfort from that same source. The rejection of an intervening God forces people to take action in dire situations and not be a bystander in hopes that…

    • 349 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Leibniz's Problem Of Evil

    • 1841 Words
    • 8 Pages

    One of the oldest and most popular dilemma in philosophy is also one of the greatest threats to the Christian theology. The problem of evil baffles some of the greatest minds in the world and nearly effects everyone in their everyday life. If god is so great, then why is there evil? The problem of evil has to do with god, it is very easy to comprehend. It is primary object to the overall existence does god exist? The problem of evil that Leibniz speaks of is one that deals with the notion that the existence of evil in the world is incompatible with a complete Devine being. Perhaps Theresa reason why god permits all evil in the world? There are two types of evil moral and natural evil.…

    • 1841 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The world around us is infatuated with the evil around us. It doesn’t take much time on the earth to realize it is an everyday thing. The unexplainable nature of evil draws people to be curious. People are demanding a reason for the bad things in the world. Although people experience evil at different levels it is inevitable. Evil produces suffering, pain, discomfort, anger, and confusion. The first question people have when experience something evil is, “Why?” Although there is not a definite answer to why evil happens, humans cannot help, but to attempt to solve it. Often time’s people look to God for the answer to why there is suffering. Scholars in all different disciplines are attempting to explain the divine nature of God among the evil we experience each day. This is a theodicy that attempts to piece together other theodicies to make the most sense possible with the little understanding we have of God and evil in the world. This theodicy is written in the hopes to help people realize their role in creating, preventing, and redeeming evil in the world.…

    • 301 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Problem of Good and Evil

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages

    For Christians, evil can be a problem because non-believers can use it as a way to attack Christianity. The first thing they might say is if there is evil, then God must not be good or omnipotent because he is allowing it. Yes, God allows evil in the world, but evil does not come from God. Evil comes directly from Satan. We see this in the book of Matthew, vs. 1-11, where Satan tries to tempt Jesus. Another way an non-believer may discredit Christianity is saying that because there is evil, God doesn't exist. This is definitely false. God does exist and we know because the Bible says so. We also can see the results of his power. Some examples of that are when Moses led the Israelites out of slavery in Egypt and God parted the waters of the red sea so they could get through, but he closed them over the Egyptians and they were wiped out. Another example is the woman who had been bleeding for twelve years, in Mark 5: 25-34, and with one touch of Jesus' robe, was healed. This is just a little taste of God's power over evil. Finally, non-believers could say that God is no better than pagan gods, but he is real and here to save us. God hates evil, but Adam sinned which caused evil in mankind, and he had to bear the consequences of his disobedience against God.…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays