Preview

Economic Factors of the Civil War

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1469 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Economic Factors of the Civil War
The Civil War's outcome could have gone either way, on one hand you have the North, which had the industrial advantage, and the South on the other who had a home field advantage and better generals too. The war pitted brother against brother and father against son, and lost many wives their sons and or husbands. The victory of the North was due to many economical factors that hindered, and ultimately defeated the South.

The North was the industrial part of the country. It depended on its' factories for most of it's revenues. The factories where mostly textile factories that processed cotton into cloth, then clothing, and processed and made other products. Between 1790 and 1860, commercial agriculture replaced subsistence agriculture in the North, and household production was replaced by factory reproduction. Massive foreign immigration from Ireland and Germany greatly increased the size of the Northern cities. From 1960 to 1965 the U.S got about three hundred thousand immigrants from Ireland and four hundred thousand immigrants from Germany (Bailey: 450). The massive immigration also meant cheap workers for the factories.

In the South, slavery impeded the development of industry and cities. It also discouraged technological innovation. The South did not industrialize like the North did they remained reliant on agriculture. By remaining reliant on agriculture like cotton and tobacco, they were also indirectly relying on the North. Everything the South grew they would ship to the North to be processed. They would send the cotton over to be processed into thread and then from thread into cloth and from cloth into clothes. After the process is done it is shipped around the world.

This "balance" was disrupted by political and economical differences between the North and South. The North was pushing for a protective tariff in order to help keep most of the business within the country not in imports. The South didn't want any tariffs on bought goods. Another factor

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    FRQ APUSH North vs. South

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Economically, the South had one relied resource and one only: cotton. It was the root of their profits, their lives, their surroundings. Despite the white majority of the 1860’s not being a part of the planter aristocracy, it was still their personal American Dream: to own slaves on a plantation with a pretty wife and white kids. The Southern economy depended primarily on the production and working of slaves, as the cheap labor force. On the industrial hand, the North was all about hard work and…equal rights, but mostly hard work. Their primary focus for economic gain was industry. Railroads, telegraphs, machines…oh my! The North also had the advantage of economic stability from the California Gold Rush which aided them to flourish dramatically, though plummeted during the Panic of 1857, which negatively affected the North due to the inflation caused by the gold. Once California was accepted into the Union (as a free state), its abundance of gold deposits held the North on its high horse before the reoccurring panics.…

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The south had what we call a Farmer's Economy. In the North factories were the main means of producing textiles and all that they needed to survive. Since they were very industrial the need for slaves was not necessary in order to make production happen. Slavery was…

    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Southern economy depended primarily on massive accumulations of cotton and tobacco. Unlike the South, the North experienced the Industrial Revolution (OpenStax, 430). Devices or methods, such as the cotton gin and interchangeable parts made mass production possible. Due to the Civil War, the North focused on building a transcontinental railroad for quick infrastructure transportation. The Southern economy made its profit by exporting large amounts of cotton and tobacco to Britain. Since the founding of the colonies, the southern colonies’ methods of business drastically differed from its New England neighbors. For example, South Carolina divided because the southern region focused primarily on tobacco and sugar while the northern region specialized in lumber and ship parts. Eventually, this division led to the creation of North and South Carolina. This event exemplifies how quickly the…

    • 710 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    3.Due to the substantial differences between the North’s industrial economy and the South’s agricultural economy they both had distinct advantages and disadvantages during the war. To begin with, the North’s economy was far superior to the South’s because the North had two-thirds of the nation’s population, two-thirds of the railroad mileage, and almost 90% of the nation’s industrial output. Also, many of the North’s arm factories were equipped with mass production which allowed them to compete with the gun manufacturing centers and armories of the South. The Northern economy helped them have much greater supply of resources compared to the South. On the other hand, the Confederacy had slaves which helped provide food for the army and provide the most important good of all, cotton. The South was able to use cotton as diplomatic weapon which they thought they could use to persuade France or Britain to assist or side with the Confederacy. We can also see this as a disadvantage to the Northern economy because they had no such tool or weapon to use to obtain foreign assistance or aid. Unfortunately this same advantage for the South also led to a severe disadvantage. Because the majority of the people living in the South did not own slaves, they were not the ones producing cotton. This meant that the majority of the…

    • 831 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    By 1860, 90% of the country's assembling yield originated from northern states. The North delivered 17 times more cotton and woolen materials than the South, 30 times more calfskin merchandise, 20 times more pig press, and 32 times more guns. The North created 3,200 guns to each 100 delivered in the South. Just around 40% of the Northern populace was as yet occupied with horticulture by 1860, when contrasted with 84% of the…

    • 473 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Southerner experienced drastic developments in between 1830 and 1860. More than the northerners for sure. Cotton was dominant in every way. It controlled half of the exports of the entire nation. If they could succeed as cotton farmers the southerners brought slaves and slavery with them into the southwestern territories of the United States because they knew they would need them.…

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    After the American Civil War the South was left in ruins, and the government did many things to oppress them and keep them under the North. One of the first being the Military Reconstruction Act. This slowed down the development of the south because the north forced them to focus their efforts on the reform of their governments rather than the development of the economy. However, more importantly, the main transportation system in the country at the time was dominated by the north. This was the Railroad system. The main problem that inhibited the south was that the northerners implemented a system where manufactured goods from the north and southern raw materials were cheap to transport. This kept the southerners in a niche of providing raw materials to the north by means of providing cheap prices for the transportation of raw materials.…

    • 563 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Northern soil was in favor of small farms and less agriculture than the South, but industry flourished throughout the North due to an abundance of natural resources (North and South). With no nearby slave trading companies either; the north was more inclined to promote free-labor. On the other hand, the Southern warm climate and soil favored large plantations to grow crops such as tobacco and cotton that required a lot of manpower to produce (North and South). Also, the slave trade was very ample around the Southern states. With places such as the West Indies harboring many slave trading companies the Southern people could obtain slaves easily to work their expansive farms and plantations.…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The North and the South grew different way in Civil war. In the South, there were mostly farmers. There weren’t many skilled workers that why manufacturing was not much. But in the North there were a lot of manufacturing and wealthy people, they had a lot of skilled workers. During the Civil War, there were some advantages and disadvantages between South and North.…

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Introduction In the years that followed the end of the American Civil War, and more than a hundred years after the first industrial revolution which was centered around textiles, the economy of the United States grew considerably as the country entered in its second phase of Industrial Revolution. The visual map of the United States has therefor been transformed by unprecedented urbanization as more and more people started to emigrated from the countryside to the cities. Also the new territories recently acquired by the United States in the West part of the country allowed the United States to expand a growing supply of agriculture partly due to a larger labor immigrating from Europe. Moreover, new industries and method of productions arisen during…

    • 1445 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Despite the North having more production and population, the South could have won the Civil War with a few adjustments. Notice how the South’s largest production is cotton, compared to the North. The North had a balance of different types of production, which enabled the soldiers to be easily equipped with materials and accumulate wealth. One of the major reasons why the South lost was that it spent more on cotton production instead of increasing the other types of production. If it spent more on the different types, it could have won. The South depended heavily on agricultural type of labor, through the use of slaves. The slave owners did not free the slaves, since they were needed to cultivate the cotton to raise profit for the owners. Moreover,…

    • 265 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The American Civil War from 1861-1865 was the bloodiest conflict in American history. One such person who wrote on slavery, southern society, and the Civil War was Karl Marx. Marx was mostly known for his critical writings on capitalism and European society, but the unique situations in the New World captured his attention. For Marx, the way in which the world was organized was strictly based upon economic factors and conditions. He would argue that the focus of the American Civil War should be on economic issues and those economic differences between the North and the South.…

    • 1918 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The North won the Civil War because they had many advantages including a large population, more advanced transportation, and a better war strategy. “It could draw soldiers and workers from a population of 22 million, compared with the South’s 5.5 million” (William Deverell and Deborah Gray White, United States History: Independence to 1914, California Edition, pp. 474-5). A larger population meant more people to fight in the war, which gave the Union a better chance of winning. On the other hand, the South approximately had one-fourth of the North’s population, and as a result they lost the war.…

    • 250 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Another thing that was improved upon in the Industrial Revolution was communication throughout the country. One reason for the need for better communication was the ever-expanding railway in the United States. The railroad traveled long distances through the United States’ terrain and was in need of better communication so that train schedules and shipments could stay on time. Samuel B. Morse was the American inventor of the telegraph, a machine that could send a message of electrical signals along a cable that could be decoded to form letters and words. Telegraph cable had begun to be strung up across America, usually running parallel to railroad tracks.…

    • 1236 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Civil War was fought between the Northern and Southern states of of America. Was the Civil War inevitable? It was a conflict bound to happen due to the differences between the North and South’s views on slavery, society, and politics. The South wanted their independence and freedom from the North, while the North wanted unity.…

    • 623 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays