Preview

Cause Of Disunion In American History

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1302 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Cause Of Disunion In American History
Our American History: The Causes of Disunion, and Was it an Inevitability?

History 1311
Professor
Coach
The University of Texas at Arlington

Our American History: The Causes of Disunion, and Was it an Inevitability?

I. The multiple causes of disunion in the 1850’s stemmed from decades of differing views between Americans in the North and South. From the time of the American Revolution through the Secession of the seven states which made up the Confederate States of America, each part of the country held differing views on government, economics, territorial expansion, and slavery. One other factor was a tipping point: the Presidential election of a lawyer from Illinois. It was
…show more content…
After the American Revolution, our first true government was under the Articles of Confederation, created at the Constitutional Convention set in Philadelphia on May 25, 1787. An extremely weak federal government was formed with the thirteen former colonies (now states). When problems began to surface, the leaders at that time came together during the Constitutional Convention and secretly created the Constitution of the United States. However, proponents for states’ rights such as Thomas Jefferson and Patrick Henry were not present at this meeting. Many felt that the new constitution took away the states’ rights to act independently. This resulted in the concept of nullification, where the states would have the right to determine that particular federal acts were unconstitutional. The federal government denied the states this right, and when it was felt they were being taken for granted, there began the movement toward …show more content…
This invention reduced the time necessary to separate the seeds from the cotton and was one major reason cotton became so profitable. Simultaneously, southern plantations were motivated to move toward cotton crops only, related to the profitability of the fiber. This in turn, led to an increased demand for cheap, plentiful labor. At this point, the economy of the south became dependent on slaves and cotton. During this same time period, the North was more industrialized than their southern agrarian neighbors. The textile industry in the north produced finished items with the raw cotton they had purchased. At this point, the two cultures were seen as very different, and it put into motion a disparity in economic attitudes: the plantation “system” with slaves and slave owners vs. the more elite city life.
Expansion and Slavery Both the North and South had tried to resolve the issue of slavery on numerous occasions, but were unable to agree completely. The Missouri Compromise of 1820 had established the 36˚ 30 ' parallel as the border between the slave states and the free states. Eventually, this compromise became too restrictive for the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    The American antebellum South, though steeped in pride and raised in military tradition, was to be no match for the burgeoning superiority of the rapidly developing North in the coming Civil War. The lack of emphasis on manufacturing and commercial interest, stemming from the Southern desire to preserve their traditional agrarian society, surrendered to the North their ability to function independently, much less to wage war. It was neither Northern troops nor generals that won the Civil War, rather Northern guns and industry. From the onset of war, the Union had obvious advantages.…

    • 2915 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    After the invention of the cotton gin, the surrender of raw cotton doubled each decade after 1800. Demand for cotton was fueled by other inventions of the Industrial Revolution, such as the machines to spin and weave it and the steamboat to transport it. At mid century the South provided three-fifths of America's exports, most of it in cotton.…

    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    5. States had given up part of their sovereignty in ratifying the Constitution and their courts must submit to federal jurisdiction.…

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Free Blacks Mini DBQ

    • 1026 Words
    • 2 Pages

    giving freed blacks the right to vote. (Document A) Other five states had restrictions on the…

    • 1026 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    States broke many of their rights as U.S citizens like their right of freedom from vacant searches,…

    • 788 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Southern economy depended primarily on massive accumulations of cotton and tobacco. Unlike the South, the North experienced the Industrial Revolution (OpenStax, 430). Devices or methods, such as the cotton gin and interchangeable parts made mass production possible. Due to the Civil War, the North focused on building a transcontinental railroad for quick infrastructure transportation. The Southern economy made its profit by exporting large amounts of cotton and tobacco to Britain. Since the founding of the colonies, the southern colonies’ methods of business drastically differed from its New England neighbors. For example, South Carolina divided because the southern region focused primarily on tobacco and sugar while the northern region specialized in lumber and ship parts. Eventually, this division led to the creation of North and South Carolina. This event exemplifies how quickly the…

    • 710 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Most of the products that the Europeans implemented were cash crops. Various cash crops included cotton,…

    • 210 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The consumers of cotton were the people of Western Europe and the North of America. The North was arguably the biggest consumer of cotton. They bought tons of cotton from the South because they had best mass production in the world. In 1860 422.6 million pounds (weight) of cotton by the South providing 80 percent of England’s demand and two thirds of the world’s supply. The North took the cotton from the South and processed it into finished products that added value and then traded those products and got more money out of it from that trade. The consumers in Europe were the ones that paid the most for the cotton. Since Europe was a generally cold place, they needed cotton and wool to make thick clothes to be warm in the winter and make artwork like tapestries for the cultural centers of the world like Italy and France. Europe had to pay high prices for the cotton because they either got the cotton from America because Uzbekistan and Pakistan were remote areas, Turkey didn’t want to trade with Europe and Brazil focused their trade on sugar and tobacco rather than cotton, leaving America as the only viable source option for the Europeans. Cotton did not come cheap those days and although Europeans were warm in the winter, they had to spend lots of money to buy cotton to be able to make clothes not only in winter but all year round. The European population was…

    • 1598 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    There was another issue which was that the Northern states believed that slavery was against the consitiution and it should be abolished. While the Southern states wanted to keep slaves working their lands and not only wanted to keep the ones they had but get more slaves since their land were expanding. There was a lot of tension between the North and South due…

    • 253 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dred Scott Decision Essay

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The North and the South had very different views on slavery which only grew stronger and separated the two regions leading up to the Civil War. As the Union gained more land the big question was whether the new land would be considered a slave state or a free state. The South needed slaves to do hard labor on their land to keep the economy growing. The North did not have a need for slaves. They feared that allowing slavery in the North would increase large plantations in the area which would threaten their own growing industrial economy. An underlying issue with the South was the fear that the federal government would take control over the individual states and their rights, especially concerning slavery.…

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Texas wanted the right to be able to express their opinions and create their own laws. Texans disliked the laws put out by the Union, wished to revise them or to withdraw. All the response Texans received from the union were that it was unlawful. “I hold that… the Union of these States is perpetual….(N)o state upon its own mere motion, can lawfully get out of the…

    • 630 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Cold War Dbq

    • 270 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The American people. The American people were deprived of their rights. According to the 26th…

    • 270 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The first issue is about Freedom, the slaves are still legal in south while north outlawed slavery, which causes tension between south and north. The North were fighting so hard to oppose slavery while the south were opt out on slavery.…

    • 197 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    There was a world of difference between the two cultures , Europeans and Native American.…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    to the source of their cotton raw materials in the south. Coupled with a lower cost…

    • 2182 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays