Does God Exists?
Ontological argument solely relies on purely logical inferences, rather than verifiable evidence. According to the premises supported by the argument, we can conclude that the claim God does exist can be conceived, but it was rather presented with assuage the doubts than to convince the skeptics. The argument begins by establishing the necessity of God’s existence through an explanation of the concept of necessary being. It is impossible to conceive of anything as coming into existence without a cause and effect. Therefore, we can say that the argument is based on the principle of causality. To grasp a better understand of causality, the following claim examined the relation between cause and effect, which God is referred to as the necessary being and “the matter, laws, and nature of everything in the universe” is called contingent beings. The next two premises entailed each other and attempt to posit a necessary being as the reason for the existence of all contingent things: “if something is contingent, then its existence is only possible. If the existence of something is only possible, then at some time it will not exist.” In other words, contingent beings exist and some time it fails to exist, they could be an event or condition that is likely but not inevitable to occur with certainty. So if everything were contingent, then at some time there would have been nothing. For instance, the laws of mathematics are often thought to be necessary. It is plausible to say that mathematical truths such as two and two making four hold irrespective of the way that the world is. God, too, is a necessary being that logically could not have failed to exist. So if the numeric system and God were considered a contingent, it might have been the case they might not have existed at all. Therefore, the argument emphasizes the following premise stating “only a necessary being must exist at all time. Something cannot come from nothing,” otherwise stated that there...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document