Preview

Doctrine of Fixtures in Property Law

Best Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1518 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Doctrine of Fixtures in Property Law
Doctrine of fixtures in property law The doctrine of fixtures is applied to determine if an object is a fixture.1 This common law provides that what is annexed to the land becomes part of the land, “quicquid plantatur solo, solo credit”, and adopts the character of real property.2 For this to transpire all circumstances surrounding the annexation to the land are examined, including but not limited to the degree of annexation and the purpose of annexation.3 Through this both objective and subjective intention are considered to determine if an object is a fixture or a chattel.4 The first object, the rail track, is substantially annexed to the land simply because it is affixed to the “bare earth by means of iron pegs”. 5 Although not impossible to remove, as Hugh did when diverting it for the better use and enjoyment by his daughers, it still is annexed with the outlook that it would remain in place for the longer term.6 In addition when the rail track was initially annexed it was constructed for transportation of the logged trees. This greatly improved the use of the land.7 Even today it provides Hugh’s daughters with an improved use of the land enabling them to “travel around the property”8. This indicates that the rail tracks were intended to remain permanently for the better use and enjoyment of the land and is prima facie a fixture.9 The next object “Grand Central” is best examined in two parts. Firstly as the systems which include the PABX telephone, air conditioning, plumbing and portable generator, and then as the building. All of the systems described would be significantly annexed with some more so than others. Typically the air conditioning unit is annexed to ensure stability, the PABX telephone and plumbing is annexed to keep them in place, and the portable generator may only be lightly annexed if it is affixed at all.
10

Despite the degree of annexation all these systems are

important services which provide individual functions to “Grand Central”

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    LRWA carmichael analysis

    • 1136 Words
    • 3 Pages

    To determine whether a person has “possession” of a property the court considers four factors: (1) whether the buyer exercises control over the property adverse to the seller; (2) whether the buyer has an exclusive right to control the property; (3) whether the buyer pays for taxes and improvements, and; (4) whether the both parties publically acknowledges the transfer. Dawson v. Tumlinson, 242 S.W.2d 191 (Tex. 1951); Johnson v. Bridgewater, 140 S.W.2d 282 (Tex. Civ. App. 1940, writ dismissed); Sharp v. Stacy, 535 S.W.2d 345 (Tex. 1976); Thorton v. Central Loan Co., 164 S.W.2d 248 (Tex. Civ. App. 1942, writ refused). The court does not consider who occupies the property. Sharp, 535 S.W.2d at 348. The details of the oral agreement are also not considered. See Dawson, 242 S.W.2d 191; Johnson, 140 S.W.2d 282; Thorton, 164 S.W.2d 248; Id. Every factor is considered, but all of them need not be present. Johnson. Presently, Carmichael paid for taxes and improvements, but each other factor is at issue.…

    • 1136 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    To develop what you believe is a terrific idea for a video game, you lease 50,000 square feet in an office building from Commercial Property, LLC, under a written five-year lease. Your goal is to put the game on the market within two years. Several months into the term, a competitor unexpectedly releases a new game title featuring play that would make your game appear to be a poorly crafted imitation.…

    • 299 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Case Study Eminent Domain

    • 1740 Words
    • 7 Pages

    He then noticed that on his front door a letter was posted communicating that the city authorities will be taking his property by eminent domain to create new businesses and jobs in the community. Not unlike the mountain property Martin is now facing another dilemma in which he is uninformed and reacting to an active developing issue. Therefore, I proceeded to explain that eminent domain or taking clause is a constitutional right granted by the Fifth Amendment that “nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation” (Miceli,2015). Similarly, to Martin’s situation, I shared the Kelo v. New London case which was one of the most controversial cases concerning eminent domain, that precipitated protest across the U.S. Likewise, the facts from the Kelo’s case corresponds with Martin’s issue with the government seizing private property to sell to private developers, hence is where Kelo felt that New London was overstepping and violating the Fifth Amendment by selling the private property to a private developer instead of using it for public use (Kubasek et al.,2016). However, the decision ruled in favor of New London for the reason that, the city seizes the property to…

    • 1740 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    State Intestacy Case Study

    • 3050 Words
    • 13 Pages

    law (separare properry) stare. separate property will generally remain separate property. Answer b is incorrect…

    • 3050 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    tax research problem

    • 554 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Reg.1.856-3(d) of the Income Tax Regulations provides that the term “real property” means land or improvements thereon, such as buildings or other inherently permanent structures thereon (including items which are structural components of such buildings or structures). Reg.1.48-1(e)(2) further defines the term “structural components” to mean such parts of a building as walls, as well as any permanent coverings components (whether in, on, or adjacent to the building) of a central air conditioning or heating system.…

    • 554 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of these would be asbestos whereby the structure may require complete demolition or partial. Due to a number of changes in building regulations and laws, there can be changes made by the government that imposes on homeowners to conduct costly renovations of their properties that may otherwise not benefit the value of the structure. When this typically occurs, some owners decide to demolish their property so that a new structure may be erected. P5) Explain the scale of refurbishment options.…

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Chapter 2 APUSH terms

    • 384 Words
    • 2 Pages

    3) Squatters’ rights resembled the privilege of buying land from a legal owner without paying for the improvements needed to be made.…

    • 384 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Property and Correct Answer

    • 4243 Words
    • 17 Pages

    | Courts frequently have to make a decision as to whether some item does or does not go with the real property when it is sold. In making their decision, they use the "Five tests of a fixture." These include of the following except:…

    • 4243 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Legal Class Study Guide

    • 2465 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Actual and exclusive – the possessor must occupy the land. However, the building of a fence around the land ot construction of a building on it constitutes physical occupation.…

    • 2465 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    This survey reveals that her neighbor’s white picket fence is encroaching three (3) feet over the property line on her side of the fence. Mildred has a deed that confirms the encroaching fence is indeed three (3) feet over her property line. The neighbor and Mildred do not remember the date of the fence or really anything about the placement of the fence. The neighbor then states that due to adverse possession, he is now the rightful owner of this additional three feet of Mildred’s property.…

    • 543 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Property Law notes

    • 4794 Words
    • 20 Pages

    Gibbs v Messer  “the object is to save persons dealing with registered proprietors from the trouble and expense of going behind the register in order to investigate the history of their author’s title, and to satisfy themselves of its validity” pg 357 CB…

    • 4794 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    This condition report concerns the immovable property situated at [furnish both deeds office and physical descriptions of the property concerned] (“the property”). This report does not constitute a guarantee and/or warranty of any kind or nature by the owner of the property or by the property practitioners representing that owner in any transaction. This report should,…

    • 889 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Property Law notes

    • 14358 Words
    • 58 Pages

    RIGHTS ABOVE SURFACE →The owner’s rights in airspace should be restricted to “any such height as is necessary for the ordinary use and enjoyment of his land and the structures upon it”. If within this meaning their may be an action in trespass. – Berstein v Skyviews and General Ltd. S 2(1) of the Damage by Aircraft Act 1952 precludes action in trespass for overflying aircraft.→ An intrusion by a land based structure located on the defendant’s land constituted a trespass to the plaintiff’s airspace - Anchor Brewhouse v Berkley House.…

    • 14358 Words
    • 58 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    On the sound development management roles of the state (page 3), give one (1) specific program/activity/project to address respond to one (1) key milestone for each role.…

    • 1588 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Project

    • 57083 Words
    • 229 Pages

    The doctrine of indoor management The rule royal brutish bank v turquand The exceptions to the doctrine of indoor management…

    • 57083 Words
    • 229 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays