Preview

David Hume: A Famous Philosopher

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1897 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
David Hume: A Famous Philosopher
David Hume is a renowned Philosopher that has shaped the ideas of cause and effect (causality) as we know them today. He suggested that true cause and effect relationship has to be the result of A causing B. The occurrence of B happening is contingent on the fact that A occurs before B, thus causing B to happen. Since he holds that this is the only rational way to conclude that one thing causes another to happen, he goes as far as to say that human beings will never know the exact cause that takes place in order for B to be the result. Hume comes to this conclusion because he maintains that there are secrete causes that cannot be observed by the human eye, thus it is impossible for humans to rationally conclude that one thing caused another …show more content…
Hume is an Empiricist, this means that he believes that the source of a humans knowledge derives from or mostly from their sensory experiences. In short, people gain knowledge from their experiences. For example, children learn languages through constantly hearing someone (a parent or guardian) speaking to them in a certain language. Another example is that one can come to know what different colors are due to actually seeing the colors. Simply knowing the name of a color does not entail that someone knows what the color actually looks like. One can never fully come to know what a color is by simply being given the definition because in order to know what a color is, one must have a visual of the color to connect with the name. Thus according to Hume, a person learns and obtains knowledge through sensory …show more content…
Things that constitute Matters of Fact can be rejected without that rejection resulting in a contradiction. In short, these objects of human reason are not certain and can not be derived from logically or rationally reflecting on a concept. With this being said, Matters of Fact can be understood to be those things that are a posteriori, which means knowledge or justifications that can is dependent upon experience or empirical evidence. An example of a Matter of Fact is the statement that Earth is the third planet from the sun. One can not know this fact by simply reflecting on Earth and the solar system. There is nothing about the Earth or the solar system that is contingent upon the Earth to be the third plant from the sun. As a result, no one can know that the Earth is the third planet from the sun without viewing with a telescope that this happening is the case. Another example of this is the statement that it is raining outside. One can not simply reflect on the concept of rain to conclude that it is raining outside. Hence, in order to know that it is raining outside one has to go to the door or window to observe that it is raining outside. In addition to this, if someone where to reject the fact that it is raining outside, that rejection has an equal ability of being true or false upon that person’s observation of it raining outside. Though

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    If death is the perpetual and permanent end of our existence, the question comes up, if suicide is morally right or wrong. Should death even be feared? Suicide rates are increasing, in fact, 2015; there was a suicide rate of 11.4 per 100,000 people, or in perspective, 800,000 in the world. My standpoint on suicide is that it is morally acceptable to do it under any circumstances.…

    • 326 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    David Hume's changed the idea of skepticism in a very different way. While Descartes used doubt and skepticism as a way to find out the foundations and roots of knowledge,Hume used sleo contrast with what we saw as the ordinary claims of knowledge. Hume explains two types of skepticism: antecedent and consequent. Both of these come in a very moderate and extreme form. He explains antecedent skepticism by using the Descartes theory of universal doubt. He explains that there is no principle that is more self evident than doubt and even if there was we would not be able to advance ahead of it because we our still able to doubt and reason deductively. This would mean Antecedent skepticism is incurable.…

    • 304 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Psyc 4100

    • 1335 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Rychlak, J. F. (1998). Is there an unrecognized teleology in Hume 's analysis of causation?. Journal Of Theoretical And Philosophical Psychology, 18(1), 52-60.…

    • 1335 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Locke and Hume argue that all concepts are derived from sense experience, from impressions of sensation or reflection.…

    • 1338 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hume’s arguments were actually responding to the argument as outlined by thinkers such as Plato, Cicero and Aquinas. Hume analyses four of the main premises laid out in a standard Teleological argument and deconstructs them in order to find fault within the logic. The first one that I shall present is Hume’s argument to disparage the claim that one can find only order and good design within the universe. Hume throws the omnipotence and benevolence of God into question when he highlights the fact that there is much suffering and pain and evidence of bad design in the world around us. It is easy to suggest that the world is not harmonious within the workings and regulations of itself and this is shown by the vast amount of suffering, disease,…

    • 444 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hume Liberty and Necessity

    • 1026 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In Section 8 of Hume’s Enquiry titled “Of Liberty and Necessity”, Hume wants to discuss what liberty and necessity mean and whether or not they can be compatible with each other. This is all really a discussion of Hume’s view of free will and determinism, and how they can be easily reconciled through compatibilism where for example both liberty and necessity are required for morality. He starts off by considering the idea of necessity and defines it as, “the constant conjunction of similar objects, and the consequent inference from one to another” (Hume 150). He wants to talk about its relation to what he calls liberty. He defines his hypothetical liberty as, “A power of acting or not acting, according to the determinations of the will” (Hume 159). This sounds like free will, meaning that people have the ability to act or not act in certain ways. He wants to deny any possibility of chance, because he’s an empiricist, and if you have the possibility of chance, what can you ever really know about the world. In every case, Hume is going to want to go out into the world and see where things come from even these ideas of liberty and necessity to see if there is a way to have both. To take it further, he goes on to claim that we’re all compatibilists without even realizing it. In order to explain his reasoning, he makes three arguments: the necessity argument, the spontaneity argument, and the anti-libertarianism argument.…

    • 1026 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hume believes the root of morality is emotion. He believes emotions, or passions, as he calls them, are the driving force behind our actions. Hume believes that how we feel about things determines what we determine is moral or immoral. There is no logical reason for keeping one’s promises if there is no benefit to you. However, we as a people have decided that keeping one’s word is moral because we would like someone to do that for us. We keep our promises because we want people to think kindly of us. There is no logic behind it, but there is emotion. Even when there is nothing to be gained for us by keeping our promises, we still maintain its moral to keep them because of how it makes us feel. This means, even when it is illogical to do something, if we feel it is moral, we should do it. Reason is not enough to change how we behave. It can give us some direction but it cannot compel us to do…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Descartes v Hume

    • 1543 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The concept of self identifies the essence of one’s very being. It implies continuous existence having no other exact equal, i.e. the one and only. Whether or not the specific characteristic(s) used to define self are objectively real, i.e. physical attributes, or purely subjective, i.e. imaginary traits, the concept makes distinct one entity from another. Rationalism is the theory that truth can be derived through use of reason alone. Empiricism, a rival theory, asserts that truth must be established by sensual experience: touch, taste, smell, et al. Rene Descartes, a philosopher and rationalist concluded that one self was merely a continuous awareness of one’s own existence; one’s substance was one’s ability to think. On the other hand, David Hume, an empiricist refuted Descartes conclusion and claimed that the concept of self was nonsense, the idea could not be linked to any sensual experience. Ultimately, Hume concluded that there was no such thing as self, i.e. self does not actually exist and that the concept was an illusion. Overall, Descartes theory of self is more reasonable than Hume’s.…

    • 1543 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Our inductive knowledge is a series of constant conjunctions and not the necessary connections required to know the truth of nature. For example we see the cause and effect of an apple falling from a tree, the apple reaching maturity and falling from its branch to the ground yet we cannot observe or experience the hidden powers of nature such as gravity. This proceeds to follow to Hume claiming that PUN cannot be justified through deduction. There is no genuine way to have the knowledge of the truths of nature through experience. Hume is right that the principle uniformity of nature cannot be proven deductively either; we are…

    • 1020 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    To support his claim, he adopts a concept of "impression": a direct perception from outer stimulation, while the idea is a perception or awareness that arises after the impression has disappeared (Hume, 539a). Implied in this claim is that all ideas are derived from experiences, and without experience, ideas cannot exist. Moreover, Hume asserts that "causes and effects are discoverable, not by reason but by experience" (Hume, 543a). That is to say, although we tend to think that we could discover all…

    • 1715 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    He says that when we think about a wound, we automatically think about the pain it can cause. This is the idea of cause and affect. Hume thinks that impressions or beliefs are more firm, lively, forcible and steady. Belief and fiction are the same concept in his mind.…

    • 1162 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Titles

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages

    When one holds a rock in the air and releases it from the hand, from our past experiences, history has told us that gravity will bring the rock hurdling back to the ground. This example goes along with this quote from Hume. “We are apt to imagine that we could discover these effects by the mere operation of our reason, without experience (p. 695).” This quote explains that we can only assume that the rock will fall because our general reasoning has led up to the high probability of it falling down, rather than experiencing first that the rock will fall. According to Hume, this way of looking at possibility is false. Hume believes that the possibilities of effect are almost infinite until you have fact or until a specific task is performed. “Every effect is a distinct event from its cause, it could not, therefore, be discovered in the cause, and the first invention or conception about it, a priori, must be entirely arbitrary (p. 696).” Between one experiences to another, there is a possibility of one thing being slightly different that could alter the effect of any cause. It is only natural for one to bring a conception into its simplest form before the task is performed. When according to Hume, the only time one can be exact about the observation of effect until an attempt of discovery is made or the action has begun. In a way, I believe what Hume is saying is that, we should not attempt to predetermine anything at all. That it isn’t until we have actually experienced any action to usefully use our reason and experience to predict what would happen if done again. As if every action should be looked at backwards, but at the same time to never narrow the possibility of what will happen to only one or a few outcomes because there is actually a infinite amount of different aspects that…

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Immanuel Kant

    • 865 Words
    • 4 Pages

    To understand Hume’s view on the world, one must first understand how cause and effect works as its basic definition and then how Hume sees it. In its purest form cause and effect is when humans observe a certain event and another event afterwards or because of the pervious event. However according to Hume this is not true, in fact Hume views the world without a very large amount of skepticism. Calling into question…

    • 865 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hume believes that humans only predict certain reactions or sequences about the future from past experiences, which is called conditioning. Due to these experiences, each individual perceives their own reality differently because of their own specific and particular experiences. He believes in custom, as opposed to reasoning. This means that he believes people do not actually have the…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Epistemology is a branch of philosophy that focuses on the theories of knowledge and justified beliefs. There are various methods that philosophers choose to arrive at knowledge and detect what can be true. Some of the philosophers that have played an important role in epistemology are René Descartes and David Hume. Even though they had spent their time doubting the sources of human knowledge, their approach was different although they wanted to arrive at a conclusion about the origin of knowledge.…

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays