Preview

Compare And Contrast David Hume's Theory Of Skepticism

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
304 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Compare And Contrast David Hume's Theory Of Skepticism
David Hume's changed the idea of skepticism in a very different way. While Descartes used doubt and skepticism as a way to find out the foundations and roots of knowledge,Hume used sleo contrast with what we saw as the ordinary claims of knowledge. Hume explains two types of skepticism: antecedent and consequent. Both of these come in a very moderate and extreme form. He explains antecedent skepticism by using the Descartes theory of universal doubt. He explains that there is no principle that is more self evident than doubt and even if there was we would not be able to advance ahead of it because we our still able to doubt and reason deductively. This would mean Antecedent skepticism is incurable. Though this extreme antecedent skepticism
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    David Hume's Powerful Ideas: An Analysis
    • 120 Words
    • 1 Page

    David Hume's Powerful Ideas: An Analysis

    In Powerful Ideas, An Introduction to Philosophy, aesthetics means "coming from the senses" which is a derivitive of the Greek word, aisthetikos (241). David Hume's believed that emotions are significant in both aesthetics and ethics. In addition, he stated that aesthetics involves both contemplation and judgment. He strongly believes that not everyone is suitable or qualify to judge art.…

    • 120 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Chapters 6 And 7 Module 2

    • 1747 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Chapters 6 And 7 Module 2

    Descartes's believed he could doubt everything that could be doubted, and the remainder was be the…

    • 1747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    David Hume's Version Of Empiricism
    • 324 Words
    • 2 Pages

    David Hume's Version Of Empiricism

    Hume’s version of empiricism begins with his distinction between analytic propositions “relationship of ideas,” which he considers to be a priori and true by definition, and synthetic propositions, which he considers to be a posteriori (“matters of fact”), and which are opposite of analytic propositions because they’re derived from our senses.…

    • 324 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    miracle hume essay 1
    • 1133 Words
    • 3 Pages

    miracle hume essay 1

    Hume uses both an a priori and inductive argument to challenge miracles, which comes from his definition of a miracle as “a transgression of a law of nature which a particular volition of the Deity interposition of some invisible agent.” Hume’s challenge relies on if the laws of nature are fixed, if they are, and the definition of a miracle is that it breaks the laws of nature, then this is a contradiction. If miracles are a contradiction then it is rational to believe that they do not occur. A Biblical example of a miracle is Jesus walking on water - it goes against what we know about gravity and about the properties of water which are both scientific and natural laws, and so it is hard to believe that his could of happened, but due to witnesses it is thought to be true. Hume argues against witnesses as he says it seems more logical to say that the witness is incorrect than to argue that the miracle actually happened.…

    • 1133 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Evaluate Hume s claim that miracles are the least likely of events
    • 654 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Evaluate Hume s claim that miracles are the least likely of events

    Hume defined miracles to be a “violation of the laws of nature” According to Hume, no matter how strong the evidence for a specific miracle may be, it will always be more rational to reject the miracle than to believe in it. The definition of Hume is both logical and objective as it esquires empirical evidence, e.g. Ockham’s razor, the simplest explanation is the correct one and therefore miracles do not occur. Hume was a septic and also thought reason through empiricism induction. However, some may say that this definition of miracles is too narrow.…

    • 654 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    David Hume's Time: The Nature Of Morality
    • 216 Words
    • 1 Page

    David Hume's Time: The Nature Of Morality

    Back in Hume’s time, there were mainly three schools of thought regarding the nature of morality. This debate was initiated by Thomas Hobbes’ view that moral obligations and duties came from self-regarding motives. In response to Thomas Hobbes’ argument, there are two schools of thought, namely rationalism and sentimentalism. Rationalists such as Samuel Clarke argued that morality could be explained by pure reason , and acting morally is just the same as acting rationally. Hume is on the side of the sentimentalists, as he rejects reason as the basis of morality . Hume argues, rather, that it is our moral sentiments that serve as the basis of moral approvals and disapprovals . In Hume’s picture, each action produces certain feelings in the recipients, be it pain or pleasure, and it is through sympathizing with the recipients which we have an impression of the resulting pain or pleasure in the recipients, and thus approve of or disapprove of the active person’s character trait which led to the action.…

    • 216 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Argument Essay: Logical Consistency And Possibility Of
    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Argument Essay: Logical Consistency And Possibility Of

    Skepticism is the philosophical position that one should refrain from making truth claims, and avoid the statement of final truths. This is not necessarily quite the same as claiming that truth is impossible, but is often also used to cover the position that there is no such thing as certainty in human knowledge. In philosophy, it is an inquiry, a method of obtaining knowledge through systematic doubt and continual…

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    David Hume's Argument Analysis
    • 1584 Words
    • 7 Pages

    David Hume's Argument Analysis

    One of the most recognized critiques of Aquinas is David Hume, who addressed the argument from design in his work Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion. Hume began by summarizing Aquinas' logic, and the many alterations that followed. Essentially, Hume argued that attributing design in the natural universe to an intelligent creator is flawed in two ways. First, he uses to analogy of a house to discredit Aquinas' inferences.…

    • 1584 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    David Hume: A Famous Philosopher
    • 1897 Words
    • 8 Pages

    David Hume: A Famous Philosopher

    David Hume is a renowned Philosopher that has shaped the ideas of cause and effect (causality) as we know them today. He suggested that true cause and effect relationship has to be the result of A causing B. The occurrence of B happening is contingent on the fact that A occurs before B, thus causing B to happen. Since he holds that this is the only rational way to conclude that one thing causes another to happen, he goes as far as to say that human beings will never know the exact cause that takes place in order for B to be the result. Hume comes to this conclusion because he maintains that there are secrete causes that cannot be observed by the human eye, thus it is impossible for humans to rationally conclude that one thing caused another…

    • 1897 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Descartes v Hume
    • 1543 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Descartes v Hume

    The concept of self identifies the essence of one’s very being. It implies continuous existence having no other exact equal, i.e. the one and only. Whether or not the specific characteristic(s) used to define self are objectively real, i.e. physical attributes, or purely subjective, i.e. imaginary traits, the concept makes distinct one entity from another. Rationalism is the theory that truth can be derived through use of reason alone. Empiricism, a rival theory, asserts that truth must be established by sensual experience: touch, taste, smell, et al. Rene Descartes, a philosopher and rationalist concluded that one self was merely a continuous awareness of one’s own existence; one’s substance was one’s ability to think. On the other hand, David Hume, an empiricist refuted Descartes conclusion and claimed that the concept of self was nonsense, the idea could not be linked to any sensual experience. Ultimately, Hume concluded that there was no such thing as self, i.e. self does not actually exist and that the concept was an illusion. Overall, Descartes theory of self is more reasonable than Hume’s.…

    • 1543 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Assess Hume's Reasons for Rejecting Miracles
    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Assess Hume's Reasons for Rejecting Miracles

    Hume’s first reason for rejecting miracles was a lack of probability. He argued that evidence from people’s experience of observing the world showed the laws of nature to be fixed and unvarying. However to suggest a miracle occurred was to say that the laws of nature had been violated, hence his definition of miracles being a “violation of the laws of nature.” Miracles were reported has having occurred by eyewitnesses, as is stated in the Bible in the case of Jesus raising Lazarus from the dead. However for Hume it was far more likely that the eyewitnesses were mistaken in what they witnessed, than for Jesus to have actually raised Lazarus from the dead and in doing so violated fixed laws of nature. A violation of the laws of nature was therefore an improbable occurrence.…

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Hume's Argument for Skepticism
    • 1318 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Hume's Argument for Skepticism

    Hume’s argument for skepticism about induction states that we can use induction, like causation, to gain knowledge. We must rely on induction to draw conclusions in everyday life because it is the only resource we have to work with. However, we must realize the limitations of induction. Philosopher Karl Popper successfully undermines Hume’s problem of induction by proving that induction is not needed in science and that Hume’s argument is circular.…

    • 1318 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Kant And Skepticism
    • 1759 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Kant And Skepticism

    Immanuel Kant argued that although human knowledge comes from experience, nonetheless knowledge must be grounded in some necessary truths. It is hard to see how the existence of logically and metaphysically necessary truths is enough to ground human knowledge. Following Kant’s reasoning, there are certain types of knowledge we have no access to. I will argue that Presuppositionalism is more plausible than Kant’s skepticism about certain types of knowledge, and that from the Presuppositionalist perspective skepticism is self-refuting. If we don’t assume that God exists, we find that we can’t reach certain conclusions and are left wanting.…

    • 1759 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Hume on Sentiments and Reason
    • 1567 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Hume on Sentiments and Reason

    In Appendix I., Concerning Moral Sentiment, David Hume looks to find a place in morality for reason, and sentiment. Through, five principles he ultimately concludes that reason has no place within the concept of morality, but rather is something that can only assist sentiment in matters concerning morality. And while reason can be true or false, those truths or falsities apply to facts, not to morality. He then argues morals are the direct result of sentiment, or the inner feeling within a human being. These sentiments are what intrinsically drive and thus create morality within a being. Sentiments such as beauty, revenge, pleasure, pain, create moral motivation, and action, and are immune to falsity and truth. They are the foundation for which morals are built, and exist themselves apart from any reasoning. Thesis: In moral motivation, the role of sentiment is to drive an intrinsically instilled presence within us to examine what we would deem a moral act or an immoral act, and act accordingly, and accurately upon the sentiments that apply. These sentiments may be assisted by reasons, but the reason alone does not drive us to do what we would feel necessary. They can only guide us towards the final result of moral motivation which (by now it's painfully clear) is sentiment.…

    • 1567 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    David Hume's Inception Essay
    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages

    David Hume's Inception Essay

    While many rationalists such as René Descartes support the notion that the concept of Inception is not possible, empiricists such as David Hume may think differently. Hume was an eighteenth-century Scottish philosopher known for his system of radical and philosophical empiricism, skepticism, and naturalism. In one of his works, Hume stated that one cannot create completely new ideas without either prior knowledge of those ideas, or experiencing those ideas. Put differently, he believed that the ideas of an individual are derived or inspired by other ideas that the individual has observed, because there is no such thing as an “original idea.” Taking Hume’s theory into account, in the movie Inception, the protagonist Dom Cobb teaches his new architect, Ariadne, how dreaming works. In their shared dream, Ariadne comes across Dom’s wife, Mal. While this…

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics