Preview

Comparing King Richard III And Al Pacino's

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
926 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Comparing King Richard III And Al Pacino's
“Texts on their own are interesting, but when you compare them to other texts they become illuminating.”
How has your exploration of the connections between King Richard III and Looking for Richard moved you to a heightened appreciation of each text?

William Shakespeare’s, King Richard III, and Al Pacino’s film, Looking for Richard, conversely explores key ideas and values portrayed in both texts. The comparison accentuates the deep similarity of ideas and values, which drive the two texts. Villainy and power in King Richard III highlights the values of moderation and stability of the Renaissance age. Similarly, Al Pacino examines these same ideas to emphasise the values of creativity and artistic integrity. Examining how each composer relies on an exaggerated and heightened characterisation of Richard
…show more content…
Pacino’s docudrama ‘Looking for Richard’ idolises Shakespeare’s key values and ideas intertwining them into the film to associate and connect with a modern audience. Pacino examines Shakespeare’s text, deconstructing and expressing the text giving his own personal opinion and teachings of King Richard III. The subtle modifications of the original text allows Pacino to reach out and grab the audience connecting with modern day Shakespeare, allowing them to realise that Shakespeare is still relevant today. This is highlighted when the cast approaches random public figures asking them about Shakespeare, a man replies, “He’s a great export. ” The random selection and interview of an average man draws the audience to realise the Shakespeare is still culturally valued and important because of the contextual change forcing a modification in values. Pacino creatively adjusts his film to resonate with a modern audience drawing them out to connect with the values and context in a modern

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    King Richard’s ability as an actor within a play explores how this type of villainy was entertaining in the era of Shakespeare. Richard’s evil is immediately established as his moral deformities are clearly embodied in his physical deformities. In justifying his premeditated meddling, he personifies war in his first soliloquy. ‘Grim visag’d war hath supported his wrinkled front’ and moved to caper ‘ nimbly in a lady’s chamber!’ Richard’s nature: ‘Deform’d, unfinished’ thus justifies his evil as he cannot participate in the war -lovemaking atmosphere. This was obviously a form of entertainment to the Shakespearean audience who had known of the war of the Roses and Richard’s deformities.…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    An examination of the impacts in texts reveals that whilst these concerns may reflect universal human weaknesses, the treatment of these issues in Shakespeare’s historical play King Richard III and Al Pacino’s Looking For Richard, reveals the eternal role that context plays in the presentation of these themes. Shakespeare examines the moral ramifications of the relentless pursuit of power, which reflects the politically unstable period of the 16th century from which he wrote. However, Pacino reappropriates Shakespeare’s depiction of power and deception for his contemporary audience to explicate the enduring nature of these concerns.…

    • 1076 Words
    • 35 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The comparative analysis of Shakespeare’s “Richard III” circa 1591 and Al Pacino’s 1996 docudrama “Looking for Richard” (LFR) reveals the capacity of these texts to transcend their timeframes due to their exploration of ideas perennially relevant to human nature. As humans, there is an innate desire of us to exert our ideals and beliefs on others as well as an underlying ambition for power, hence these texts explore the way in which art can be used to shape and reshape historical perceptions as well as the universal relevance of power to human beings.…

    • 1036 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Write a comparison between 'Richard III' by William Shakespeare and 'The Homecoming' by Harold Pinter…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    William Shakespeare’s “King Richard III”, an Elizabethan play written as a piece of Tudor propaganda, and Al Pacino’s 1996 docudrama “Looking For Richard” set in contemporary New York, have distinctive parallels in what values they concern themselves with despite their markedly different contexts. Our understanding of both texts is advanced through exploring the composers’ contrasting values of free will clashing with Providentialism and the importance of integrity and honesty in the Murder of Clarence scene from “Looking for Richard” as well as its corresponding scene from “King Richard III” (Act 1 Scene IV) and the Coronation scene (Act 3 Scene 7) and from an examination of how these flow from the changes in context.…

    • 1028 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Castle

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages

    “Texts convey certain attitudes and beliefs that help define who we are and how we relate to the world around us”…

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout Al Pacino’s Looking for Richard and Shakespeare’s King Richard III, there are many similarities between both texts. This can be seen through values such as the importance of integrity as well as trust. However, it is only to a certain extent that both texts portray these similar values. Throughout Al Pacino’s modern remake of Looking for Richard, many modern cinematic techniques such as the specific use of colours, rearrangement of the original text as well as comparisons made in commentary are heavily included. Instead of using such visual, modern techniques, Shakespeare uses much literary techniques in order to convey the importance of certain values. It is through the different methods taken to convey the importance of such values that it can be said that it is only to a certain extent that similarities are more revealing than differences.…

    • 1190 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The widely admired work of William Shakespeare has been, over the span of decades, adapted into films which originate from the same source but differ in context and means of portrayal. Filmmakers, as generations grow and society evolves, must master the art of successfully reaching out and empathizing with differing audiences whilst taking in the social, cultural and economic values widely appropriated by societies, into serious consideration. Kenneth Branagh directed and interpreted his adaptations of Hamlet by Shakespeare. Branagh, in his adaptation (1996), have interpreted Act 5, Scene 1, quite distinctly in means of sound/music, costumes and make up, lighting, camera angles and shot compositions, and editing. All of these factors are relevant…

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Richard Iii

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Shakespeare also gives great insight on Richard’s mind via diction. In Richard’s opening lines he specifically says, “Our dreadful marches to delightful measures” (1,1,8). Instead of fighting the Lancasters Richard (and his family) are in a time of harmony. He intentionally changes the negative word to a positive. Lines like these are all throughout the opening soliloquy. Richard allows the audience to see that he is at peace, that he is relaxed. By his big soliloquy in Act 5, Richard’s attitude is down. He’s worried about all the deeds he’s done. He directly states, “Is there a murderer here? No. Yes, I am:” (5,3,211). Not only does he leave the negative word of “murderer” in the sentence, but he…

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    No matter what critics say, Luhrmann’s film was a masterpiece. He was dared to make something new, whereas in this matter, as it seemed, everything has been told, seen and created. The film was an experiment which can be described as blending two substances, of which no one would have ever thought that they can go together this well. It was a kind of play with conventions, which was based on an assumption that if one takes a work of a great dramatist, a couple of talented actors, adds some modern set and seasons it with good music, the outcome must be delicious. And actually the assumption turned out to be right. The ‘modernisation of Shakespeare’ tends to be one of the few possible ways of popularisation of his plays within the contemporary society.…

    • 947 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Critical Lens

    • 431 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Setup: This quote suggests that true literature evokes an emotional or meaningful response in the reader; it in some way changes how we view things.…

    • 431 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Chosen Topic: Many directors have staged and filmed conceptualized versions of Shakespeare’s work, hoping to derive new or unexpected meaning from old plays. Does Almereyda’s 21st century interpretation of Hamlet intensify or diminish the play’s “greatness”? Make a strong case, using examples from the film to support your argument.…

    • 1109 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hamlet Rhetorical Analysis

    • 1632 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In spite of the fact that the plot evokes the implication that it occurred between the close of 16th century and the start of the 17th century, Shakespeare’s Hamlet surpasses the constraints of time and muses upon both the primitive and contemporary man. In the late 16th century in England, people of all classes on the social echelon, with the exception of royals, were able to publicly eyewitness theatre. Audiences craved new plays to assuage their appetites. One of numerous dramatists that capitalized this abundance of opportunity was Shakespeare. Opposed to the modern time, audiences spectated the play to hear it rather than see it. The articulation of the lines and significance of how the story was recited was crucial…

    • 1632 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Shakespeare’s works are not limited to expressing the concerns and interests of a narrowly confined historical period. They have in them the…

    • 3051 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Year 2006 saw two made-in-China films based on Shakespeare’s Hamlet—Feng Xiaogang’s Madarin Yeyan (The Banquet) and Sherwood Hu’s Tibetan Ximalaya wangzi (The Prince of the Himalayas). For their Shakespearean components, the films join their counterparts elsewhere around the globe that interpret, appropriate, dissemble, and reconstruct Shakespeare’s canonical text. To be sure, they have in their own ways recycled and added value to the Bard’s cultural capital in a re-boost of his popularity in postmodern media—either on the niche or the commercial market. Since foreign language films based on Shakespeare are out of the theoretic radar of Shakespeare adaptation, fidelity seems beyond concern,1 and in spite of their relations with the play, it is not my position to do justice to the ways in which the two filmic spinoffs handle the English Bard’s authority. Rather, I would focus on how the two movies as independent art works make use of his cultural capital to present their hermeneutics of both Shakespeare and local cultures through the popular media. I will examine how they reinvent the Shakespearean story and how they treat the local history and culture, in which they set their cinematic narratives. I will also ask these questions: Are history and culture thematically or dramaturgically crucial to Shakespeare’s Hamlet? Or, why are they significant to such a revenge story anyway? In addressing some of the questions, I will critique the movies’ revalorizations of the natural sphere and some particular cultural meanings they unintentionally consolidate or attempt to challenge. Some of these meanings may be to feminist chagrin or problematic from a post-structural perspective. Finally, I will argue that the two films add complexities to our definitions of modernity and postmodernity in terms of cultural production. While the films confirm some of Fredric Jameson’s…

    • 5790 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays