Preview

Charles I: The Three Phases Of Charles I

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
906 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Charles I: The Three Phases Of Charles I
Alpines, and at this point the Austrian prime minister Lammasch advised Charles that the situation he was in was only getting worse so the best case would be to step down and give up his right to exercise sovereign power. In November of 1918, an armistice was signed to end war between the allied powers and German forces. The same day Charles issued a proclamation that would address the Austrian people right to determine the future of the state. Charles similarly did the same for Hungary on the 13th of November. This proclamation addressed to both Austria and Hungary merely was Charles I way of stepping down from the throne and he knew that because of all of the damage and the hectic state of Austro-Hungary he had to step down. Austria and …show more content…
The three phases I've analyzed are his heritage, his reign under power of the Habsburg empire, and finally the downfall and end of the empire. Charles’s heritage and growth as a young adult which would eventually led to him succeeding his uncle Franz Josef. His reign which can be marked by his peace negotiations during War along which his attempt to save what was a failing monarchy. And the last topic, is examining the end of the Habsburg empire and Charles I. As we analyze the development of Charles as a young adult we notice that he in no way was prepared to fight the battles and demand so much out of a state that he knew so little about. Charles in some ways was thrown into the job as if he was supposed to serve as the savior to a empire that had been on the decline years prior to war. Charles attempted to make peace with rival countries in the Allied forces through secret negotiations, which completely backfired in a way that lost his credibility, respect, and overall trust from countries throughout Europe. Despite all of this and the lack of foreign policy and improvement that Charles was unable to display, he showed resilience and determination in fighting until he no longer could to save the Habsburg Empire. Through the Trialist Monarchy with Croatia, creation of the confederation, and multiple attempts at reclaiming the throne we notice that Charles wanted so badly for this Empire to last, but time ran out. The World War sent the state of Austria-Hungary into a downward spiral that they were not able to dig themselves out of. Charles wanted to save the empire from war as his policies stemmed towards ending the conflicts in World War I as soon as possible. The legacy of Charles I was brief and although many may view his reign as a failure, as it resulted in the death of the Habsburg Empire, Charles should be

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In terms of finance, it can be argued that the situation was not successful. The Government managing it could not provide a stable financial settlement. Largely the King did not have much in the way of money, and Charles' excessive spending on pleasurable activities, at the beginning of his reign only exacerbated the disastrous financial situation. Initially, although Charles agreed to give up feudal dues that were revived by his father, he was granted an annual income of £1.2 million by Parliament. However, this arrangement had two drawbacks. Firstly, the financial settlement that Charles was given, was simply not adequate to his needs. Secondly, the hearth tax that was imposed to raise the money was highly unpopular to the people. It is hard to say a reign is 'successful' if the Monarch is unpopular, especially as the country at that time, was still suffering from the financial situation left behind by the…

    • 1214 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Charles I did not go along with the parliament. He took a serious hit during his 22 years as king. He began to give into extra parliamentary resorts such as, new tariffs and duties and collection of discontinued taxes. This angered the parliament as taxes were being illegally collected for an already unfortunate war and one that involved France…

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ap Euro Chapter 15 Summary

    • 2936 Words
    • 12 Pages

    ____ 19. Although Charles V had many adversaries, his chief concern during his reign was…

    • 2936 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1450-1750 Era Study Guide

    • 1199 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Charles V- inherited the Hapsburg part of the Holy Roman Empire , concentrated on Lutheranism, didn’t expand/strengthen the Holy Roman Empire…

    • 1199 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    When King Charles I dismissed Parliament in 1629, he was set on the idea of a personal rule without any help from Parliament. This he could manage, as long as he avoided war. His aim was to sort out the country's finances, and with the help of Strafford and Laud, impose a 'Policy of Thorough'. This policy was the idea of a fair and paternalistic government with no corruption. However, within 11 years, Charles' personal rule had failed and England was drifting into war. There are mixed opinions on whether this failure was solely due to the actions of the King, or those of third parties, for example, Strafford or Laud.…

    • 1052 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Kings and Queens Paper

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In 1516, Charles V became king of Spain and its colonies in the Americas. Charles V was not always called Charles V when he first was king of Spain he was known as Charles I. he changed his name after his other grandfather died and he became the heir to the sprawling Hapsburg Empire which included the Holy Roman Empire and the Netherlands. Therefore, after all was said and done Charles V had control of almost all of South America, Spain, Germany, and the Netherlands one of the biggest empires ever! Because Charles had a huge empire, he was involved in constant warfare. He fought to suppress Protestantism in the Germanic states, but after years of fighting, he was forced to allow German princes to choose their own religion. Charles also faced the Muslim Ottoman Empire, which caused major defeats for Spain. Charles V gave up his titles and retired on 1556. He split up his lands between two of his brothers.…

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Charles’s led the country without calling parliament for 11 years from 1629 – 1640. He initiated personal rule for many reasons. Firstly his close relationship with Buckingham alienated Parliament and caused resentment by Parliament. Secondly Charles had very strong believed in divine right and therefore saw no need for Parliament. Furthermore Charles religious policy’s led many to believe of a Catholic Conspiracy, which further distanced the King from Parliament. Lastly the King wasn’t getting substantial financial help from Parliament and decided that he would try and raise the finance without him.…

    • 1197 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    His childhood left a mark on Charles's behaviour as king. Like James he was a believer in the divine right of kings. Unlike James, he was absolutist and tried to put it into practice. Given his belief in divine right, he saw all parliaments privileges as being subject to the approval of the monarch, not as liberties that had existed without the judgement of the monarch. Also unlike James He saw all criticism and anyone who questioned him as disloyal. An example of these in combination is when Charles I dissolved parliament because he was being criticized by Parliament as he felt he didn't need them as long as he could avoid war. This began the 11 year period known as the Personal Rule where he ran the country through royal prerogative instead of in cooperation with parliament.…

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Father Charles died technique, Maximilian, in mà king of Spain is the candidate most able members. While Henry VIII of England and Frederick the Wise of Saxony is the first contest, Francis I of France emerged as the main opposition. France Valois Francis is the line is inconsistent with the Austrian Habsburgs. Supported pope Francis is on the monarchy as the Habsburgs Augmented and its invasion in Italy, but something a papal financial Charles jam is not: Cap much reliance on major sources, which includes the support of the Fugger of Augsburg, to bribe the electors to choose him. The cost was 850,000 florins Charles, 500,000 allowances Fuggers được Ma a loan. Spanish past tense emperor Charles I was elected in June 1519 and coronated Charles V in October 1520 in Aix-la-Chapelle, an imperial free city from Germany. He will receive his royal crown of Pope Clement VII at Bologna in 1520, the last emperor was crowned pope's example…

    • 1320 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    DESCRIPTION: Emperor Charles V requested a meeting with the Leaders hoping to clarify their religious beliefs in an attempt to restore religious and political unity. Emperor Charles believed that this would rally support against the Turkish invasion.…

    • 485 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    England's history has been prosperous with phenomenal monarchs. However, in a time during The Restoration of the English Throne; history was introduced to King Charles II who would be permanently etched in the hearts of his subjects. The son of King Charles I of England; young Charles II’s life was one of turmoil and uncertainty as he witnessed his country thrown into a civil war. Charles was sent to exile as a child and spent his life plotting for his banished throne. After secret dealings with Scotland and conflict with a dissident named Cromwell; Charles eventually regained his rightful place as King of England. Riddled by accomplishments and failures; his reign was monumental enough to etch his name in history books as a significant English monarch.…

    • 471 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Austro-Hungarian Empire was huge multi-national empire. Some of the mayor nationalities represented, other then the Austrians and Hungarians, were Czechs and Pols. The empire was a dual-Monarchy, because of the Austrians defeat under the Austro-Prussian war. The Austrian empire was weak and in need of a new government. The Hungarians grasped their opportunity to demand more power and a dual-Monarchy, which made Franz Joseph I both the emperor of Austria and the king of Hungary. Some of the other large groups of people (i.e. the Czechs and poles) in the empire felt it unfair that the Hungarians should get power and the right to rule over their part of the empire when they themselves had no influence. Therefor one could say that it is due to great ethnic diversity and dissatisfaction within these ethnic groups that the Austro-Hungarian Empire was weak and unstable.…

    • 543 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the biggest factors of Charles’s personal rule which reveals his intentions is his control of…

    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Charles was able to exile Monmoth to the Netherlands in September 1679, use his prerogative powers to dissolve the exclusion parliaments 3 times and prorogue parliament 7 times and attend sessions in the house of Lords to secure support as well as allowing James back into the Privvy council in 1684. It also created greater stability for the elite with respect to property right. The fact he was able to defeat exclusion would have proven that Charles II was a strong monarch and able to stand up to parliament. Furthermore his success would have given Charles and much of the country including Torys confidence in the security of the monarchy which explains why 1681 was a turning point and seen by historians as a royalist recovery. The period between 1681-1685 is seen as a period of growing absolutism where Charles successfully got rid of his opposnents such as Shaftesbury and Monmoth during the Rye house plot and manipulate local government using charters and also manipulate the judiciary. He also used the Church for propaganda made sure that his decleration was read out from pulpits. Therefore Charles’s successful defeat of the exclusion crisis and growing absolutism is evidence that he was in a stronger…

    • 1227 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    If there is one person to blame for World War I, its Archduke Franz Ferdinand, only he didn’t do anything bad, he was just assassinated, which sparked Austria’s tensions and therefore started the war. The buildup would’ve been much slower, perhaps even the war avoided, no costs for Germany, and no Second World War, which might’ve meant no Holocaust. Archduke Franz Ferdinand was the leader of Austria before getting shot by teenager Gavrilo Princip. The assassination of Archduke was unjust because he was a great leader, fixed many of Austria’s current problems, and didn’t partake in the social and political problems surrounding the ongoing war buildup. Unfortunately Austria decided to use this as an excuse, they used him for a reason to go to war with Serbia, despite them not having much to do with Austria’s problems.…

    • 580 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays