Preview

King Charles II Research Paper

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
471 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
King Charles II Research Paper
Victim of Vice & Glory

England's history has been prosperous with phenomenal monarchs. However, in a time during The Restoration of the English Throne; history was introduced to King Charles II who would be permanently etched in the hearts of his subjects. The son of King Charles I of England; young Charles II’s life was one of turmoil and uncertainty as he witnessed his country thrown into a civil war. Charles was sent to exile as a child and spent his life plotting for his banished throne. After secret dealings with Scotland and conflict with a dissident named Cromwell; Charles eventually regained his rightful place as King of England. Riddled by accomplishments and failures; his reign was monumental enough to etch his name in history books as a significant English monarch. Charles reign was infamous because of his inability to work with the Parliament and the consequences in thereof. Charles having a sympathetic stance on Catholicism, and perhaps a secret convert himself, passed laws favoring English Catholic subjects such as The Declaration of Indulgences. This act attempted to provide religious liberty to Roman Catholics by suspending previously established Penal Laws. A protestant parliament responded furiously, passing The Test Act of
…show more content…
A shining beacon of accomplishment was his support of The Royal Society of London for Improving Natural Knowledge. Originated on November 28, 1660 by Sir Christopher Wren and other academic men who had a vision of a research institute. Charles nurturing a love of arts and sciences encouraged the building of the organization which still stands as the United Kingdom’s national science academy. King Charles had many flaws, an inability to control his vices was one of them. However, his accomplishments shouldn’t be understated; most notably, the Royal Society remains a source of pride in the country that he longed for, loved, and ultimately lost the faith

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The end of the interregnum government heralded Charles II's return to the throne. The period known as the restoration can be argued to have been 'successful' for Charles. However, a successful reign can be distinguished in many ways. At the time one of the most important issues for Charles was trying to create a stable financial and stable settlement after the long period without a Monarch, and to an extent, 'success', can be defined to whether a stable settlement was established. Charles' triumphant, Anglican, State Church was arguably successful as it formed a stable religious settlement, yet on the other hand, it was not what Charles initially wanted. In this way it could be argued that 'success' can be measured to what extent Charles got what he wanted, and how much control he had over his Parliament. A successful reign can also be measured by assessing how well liked Charles was by his people at the time of financial difficulty following the grievances of the Civil War.…

    • 1214 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Charles I did not go along with the parliament. He took a serious hit during his 22 years as king. He began to give into extra parliamentary resorts such as, new tariffs and duties and collection of discontinued taxes. This angered the parliament as taxes were being illegally collected for an already unfortunate war and one that involved France…

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Charles II faced a vast amount of difficulties during his reign, but particularly during the period of 1667-1678. He suffered financial difficulties, foreign policy issues and religious problems. Finance became an obvious problem due to his lack of funds, however his foreign policy was constantly needing money, and a combination of both left Charles with many difficulties.…

    • 1433 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    When King Charles I dismissed Parliament in 1629, he was set on the idea of a personal rule without any help from Parliament. This he could manage, as long as he avoided war. His aim was to sort out the country's finances, and with the help of Strafford and Laud, impose a 'Policy of Thorough'. This policy was the idea of a fair and paternalistic government with no corruption. However, within 11 years, Charles' personal rule had failed and England was drifting into war. There are mixed opinions on whether this failure was solely due to the actions of the King, or those of third parties, for example, Strafford or Laud.…

    • 1052 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Charles the First became king in England, (also in Scotland) in 1625. He caused many problems with the Parliament because he believed in absolute monarchy. At one point Parliament limited Charles The First's power and he went along with a petition they had made but soon dismissed the Parliament.…

    • 370 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Charles’s led the country without calling parliament for 11 years from 1629 – 1640. He initiated personal rule for many reasons. Firstly his close relationship with Buckingham alienated Parliament and caused resentment by Parliament. Secondly Charles had very strong believed in divine right and therefore saw no need for Parliament. Furthermore Charles religious policy’s led many to believe of a Catholic Conspiracy, which further distanced the King from Parliament. Lastly the King wasn’t getting substantial financial help from Parliament and decided that he would try and raise the finance without him.…

    • 1197 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    His childhood left a mark on Charles's behaviour as king. Like James he was a believer in the divine right of kings. Unlike James, he was absolutist and tried to put it into practice. Given his belief in divine right, he saw all parliaments privileges as being subject to the approval of the monarch, not as liberties that had existed without the judgement of the monarch. Also unlike James He saw all criticism and anyone who questioned him as disloyal. An example of these in combination is when Charles I dissolved parliament because he was being criticized by Parliament as he felt he didn't need them as long as he could avoid war. This began the 11 year period known as the Personal Rule where he ran the country through royal prerogative instead of in cooperation with parliament.…

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Did you know that King George 11 had more of a life then you would think?…

    • 296 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Oliver Cromwell was a general for the Puritans during England's civil war. Cromwell captured Kin Charles for treason and had him executed. Cornwell now held power of England. He became a military dictator after ripping a constitution. Ireland then rebelled against him, so he sent an army to crush the rebels. 616,000 Irish died. After Cromwell's death the parliament appointed Charles II as ruler. Charles restored monarchy and brought back sports and theater.…

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For Charles II, it would only make sense to get revenge on the organization that that removed his father from the throne, proceeded to execute him, and then essentially sent Charles II as far away from his birth right as possible. Charles II had a profound hatred of the New Model Army, and all he needed was a legitimate excuse to remove them. The biggest problem with having a full-time professional army is that they are always being paid even when not fighting. Charles II used the cost of the New Model to justify dissolving the army without making it appear to be him completing his personal vendetta. The New Model Army was surprisingly passive when they were disestablished in January 1661, though General Monck could keep his regiment leaving approximately 3,500 troops in Charles II’s control. On February 14, 1661, Monck marched his troops to Tower Hill, where they laid down their swords to represent the end of the New Model Army. They immediately retook their weapons in the name of King Charles II as a sign that they were now under the control of the king. Monck and his men were…

    • 386 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When Charles became King in 1625 he favoured the principles of Arminianism – he placed order and uniformity above tact – despite many of members of Parliament, and the English society, preferred Puritanism. Throughout the beginning of Charles’ rule he would encourage and promote Arminianism, even those who openly attacked Puritans through writing. For example, in 1926, Laud began to provoke parliament by saying in a sermon ‘Puritans were meditating a revolution in both the state and the church’; instead of punishing Laud, Charles would eventually give him the title as Chancellor of Oxford University, and then went on to become the Archbishop of Canterbury. Another example is an Arminian cleric Richard Montagu, he wrote ‘An Old Gag for a New Goose’ and ‘Appello Caesarem’, which stressed the similarities between Catholicism and the Church of England, Charles would appoint him Royal Chaplain in 1625. Puritans around this time believed the Pope, leader of the Catholic Church was the antichrist or devil and so being compared to the Catholics was an unforgiveable insult; also to appoint Montagu as the Royal Chaplain meant that Charles identified Arminianism as the religion of England, this would only cause further tension with Puritans and Parliament. Charles also antagonized Parliament by getting Laud to preach the opening sermon, and stressing obedience to the King and supported Royal Prerogative and Divine Right; these actions saw Charles as pro- catholic, which…

    • 1601 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    With the backing of the crown botanist and scientist alike were free to travel world discovering what the new world had to offer. By looking at William Young Jr’s career we see how royals played into exploration and science. Royals unintentionally caused tension among…

    • 1568 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The founding fathers' view of King George III is that he is a tyrant because be denied the basic rights of colonists. Patrick Henry said "ours petitions have been slighted; ours remonstrances have produced additional violence and insult; ours supplications have been disregarded; and we have been spurned, with contempt, from the foot of the throne."Thomas Paine said " Britain, with an army to enforce her tyranny has declared that she has a right to not only tax us but to bind us in all cases whatsoever." Thomas Jefferson said "He has refused his Assent to…

    • 97 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    A Satyre On Charles II

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages

    This poem is one of the most difficult to establish a definitive version for. Here, I present the poem as Vieth published it in his 1968 edition of the Earl's poetry, along with Vieth's notes.…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Charles I's Trial

    • 547 Words
    • 3 Pages

    During the trial, Charles continued to uphold the thought that he was of divine right and, therefore, the law. Even after he was read the opening statements, he responded that any who accused him of being a “Tyrant, traitor, and murderer, and a public and implacable Enemy of the Commonwealth of England” went against him and were under the judgement of God. The King also refused to plead. Nevertheless, the law stated that the prisoner be treated as though he had pleaded guilty in the case of high treason. On January 30, 1649, King Charles I was executed by beheading.…

    • 547 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays