Preview

Argumentative Essay: Should There Be Punished?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
979 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Argumentative Essay: Should There Be Punished?
What if you were sentenced to death for a crime you didn’t commit? Cameron Willingham was put to death for a crime he didn’t even commit. It’s not okay to sentence someone to death for something they didn’t do. Life in prison is a much better option because you can’t escape from what you did. If you are innocent you will be able to get let out of prison, you just have to sit and think about the crime you committed, and if you have a case like Willingham where you were innocent they would be able to release you from prison.

When someone is sentenced to death, that is an escape from having to sit and deal with what they did. You can’t take it back, cases like Ron Williamson who was convicted for a murder. They later found out there was another match to the DNA. He had been sentenced to death but was let out when found innocent (forensicsciencetechnician). If he would have been killed, we would have killed another innocent man. Williamson, was one of the few lucky ones. One case that wasn’t so lucky would be the case of Cameron Todd Willingham. He was charged for the murder by arson which led him to the death sentence. A deadly house fire killing his children was considered “arson.” Craig Beyler conducted a review on the evidence used to
…show more content…
They need to sit in prison with the knowledge of what they did until they die either of old age or sickness. When given the death sentence you don’t have to face what you did. You are getting off the hook by dying and you don’t have to think about what you did. You are just fed and then killed. You don’t have to think about everything you did that you shouldn’t have done and the crimes you have committed. Also it isn’t fair to tell the kids that they can’t hurt someone for hurting them yet, kill someone for killing someone or raping someone. The death sentence is an escape from the crime they

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Finally, there is the issue of the effectiveness and fairness of the death penalty. There have been countless cases to come before the courts, alleging that there are innocent individuals on death row and that this is an act that cannot be reversed if the criminal allegations prove to be untrue. Adding to the issue is that the death penalty costs the state and ultimately society, millions of dollars to process a capital punishment. Most of the offenders on death row, challenge the process at every step of the judicial process and in doing so likely waste considerable resources as often the end result remains the same, barring new evidence.…

    • 1255 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Such mistakes that have been made must be prevented for the future, so that the innocent don 't continue to suffer. In fact, the Innocence Project, an organization that emphasizes the faults in our death penalty system, states that the inmates falsely accused of their crimes "...were convicted in 11 states and served a combined 209 years in prison – including 187 years on death row – for crimes they didn’t commit." (Innocence Project). To be exonerated after years and years must leave unfathomable mental trauma. If that many innocent people have been forced to wait on the edge of death for this long, it wouldn 't be hard to believe that some won 't be lucky enough to be saved from the mistakes of our unacceptably inefficient court system. Killing a person, even sentencing them to death, is only just if they truly deserve it. That is what Dexter argues, yet our country continues to ineffectively implicate capital punishment by making the innocent suffer through unnecessary torture. We must end capital punishment, or at least make it more efficient. There are lives at…

    • 1974 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Society demands that punishment should fix the harm it has done. By sentencing a person to death no harm has been fixed. As long as capital punishment exists in our society it will continue to spark the injustice, which it has failed to curb. The death penalty is morally and socially unethical, should be construed as cruel and unusual punishment, has no proof of acting as deterrent, and risks the appalling and unacceptable injustice of executing innocent people. It does not matter who does the killing as long as a life is taken by another, it should always be considered…

    • 1955 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    How people to have such a dramatic change in the way that they view a kid. They are still learning and maturing, just because they commit a crime doesn't mean that they are finished growing. Convicting them to life in prison is just wasting their life they are too young to understand that their mistake can ruin their whole life. If you want to send kids to adult prison then you should treat them like adults all the…

    • 551 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In my personal opinion, I believe the death penalty should be broadened, if anything. People who commit acts of heinous violence have no place in society, (besides prison society) which is costly to us taxpayers, who are also the victims. Murder isn’t the only heinous act. I consider pedophilia to be a heinous act of violence. Whether pedophilia is a mental illness or not is beside that fact, because the torment the victim is left to suffer with for their entire life is reprehensible. These people get a slap on the wrist, and are back out on the street to commit the same heinous acts over and over again. I do believe in the death penalty, and I most certainly believe these people should be on the list to receive…

    • 1187 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    As stated by Margaret Van de Pitte, “Hunting and gun ownership continue to be associated with liberty, a very fundamental right indeed” (263). The exercise of deliberate stalking, observing, and killing of animals is a cherished pastime that positively impacts our world today. The base of traditional and cultural practices, hunting wild animals should remain legal due to the environmental and economic benefits.…

    • 1737 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Leading on from this argument, there is also the undeniable possibility that someone completely innocent could be wrongly accused and consequently put to death. For example, the publicity surrounding the case of Stefan Kiszko perfectly illustrates how wrongful convictions can and do occur. The guiltless man was unfairly sent to prison for the rape and murder of Lesley Molseed. Sixteen years later Kiszko’s innocence had been proven beyond doubts due to advances in DNA evidence. This ‘miscarriage of justice’ (as Kiszko’s MP described it) was reprehensible, abominable and barbaric. Imagine how much more of a scandal this would have been if this blameless man had been killed? Although some people believe that advances in forensic science may prevent this from happening today; nothing can guarantee that innocent people…

    • 574 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In my perspective the death penalty does not reach the minds of most criminals because a criminal rarely believes he/she could be caught. They hold a belief that they are intelligent enough to outsmart authorities. There is other whom holds such anger towards certain crimes that they believe death is a rightful punishment, but death does not “undo” a crime they have committed. I think it would be better for a criminal to think and reminisce their conscious. Their death would only put peace in their state of mind and except them from the punishments that prison holds for them. Families harmed by these criminals are sometimes frightened by the thought that they’re persecutor could escape and harm them again, however someone sentenced to life in parole in the united states has never escaped or been released. There is also a possibility that an innocent person could be convicted of a crime they did not commit, even with all our new technology and DNA testing there is always a chance of making a…

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    capital

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages

    I will be the first to admit that there are people in this world that has done some pretty terrible things. Maybe to themselves or to other people! Even though those people may have no remorse over the things they have done us as human beings have to be the ones to say when enough is enough. The history of the death penalty is a long and brutal one. From the stoning and crucifixion killings of the B.C. era to today’s methods of the electric chair and lethal injection, governments of one kind or another have sentenced people to death for thousands of years [CA Innocence Project, 2009]. It’s simply a disciplinary act that needs to be eliminated. Wouldn’t it be more efficient for Guilty people to sit in jail and live with what they have committed? To think about what they have done day in and day out, to have the world judge them and to know that family and friends has shunned them from their lives, because of the things that they have done in the past. They may not get over it today, maybe not even tomorrow but after a life time of sitting in the jail with nothing and no one, they are more than likely to “break down” and feel the guilt sooner or later. They would not be human if they didn’t, to have to grow old and sit in prison knowing that you won’t ever be able to leave or see sunlight ever again. Knowing that no one’s going to help you, and knowing that that is where you are going to die would be a terrible feeling.…

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One major purpose of the death penalty is to punish people for their horrible crimes. However, the death penalty has put many innocent people on death row. Since 1973, 156 people have been exonerated (released from death row/evidence shows they aren’t guilty). The average time between getting the death sentence and exoneration is about 11 years. This is already terrible, forcing innocent people to believe that their life is nearly over, because of a crime that they didn’t commit, but it gets worse. It is very likely that people living in the United States have been wrongly executed. Multiple cases have evidence that proves that the “criminal” is actually innocent. In 1991, the house of Cameron Todd Willingham was destroyed by a fire, killing the three children who were sleeping inside. Willingham escaped and his wife was shopping at the time. Prosecutors stated that Willingham had purposefully set the house on fire to cover up the abuse of his children. He was executed by lethal injection in 2004. However, there is a proof that shows that the fire was not caused by Willingham. Unfortunately, nothing can be done now because these people have already been executed, but it does teach us one thing: If the death penalty cannot be used to punish the real offender and risks the lives of innocent people in the process, it can’t be used by our…

    • 1868 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Juveniless Death Penalty

    • 1577 Words
    • 7 Pages

    I think of troubled youth that are influential still in their behaviors, but still know the difference between right and wrong. The same as well with a 16 or 17 year old juvenile. Many, when asked this, would think of their own children and see nothing wrong. That their children do know what is right and what is wrong. The above juveniles mentioned in the cases probably did know that what they were doing was wrong, but had a criminal past behind them that fueled these heinous acts. For their actions, they were sentenced to death. Many feel that the sentence imposed be wrong due to the ages of the defendants. Yet, the states overruled them in saying that the Eighth Amendment was not violated. I support the death penalty, and feel that the court followed all procedures and the sentence imposed was just. In conclusion, I feel that the punishment should fit the crime, and the punishment in these cases has.…

    • 1577 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Unjust Conviction

    • 1450 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Looking at the death penalty system in action, it is fundamentally flawed in use and there is a serious risk of executing innocent people. Many unjust convictions have shown that serious flaws such as: Lack of eyewitness identification, False confessions, and the access to have DNA testing have caused our countries criminal justice system to convict many innocent individuals, who were sentenced to death.…

    • 1450 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Death Penalty Cases

    • 1477 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The controversy surrounding the death penalty is an issue that has no end in sight. For the worst-of-the-worst, the people who have committed the most heinous crimes, some feel as though there is no better suited punishment than the most severe, death. However, the opposing side often brings up arguments the logic in punishing a murderer with murder, and how much justice could actually be achieved, or whether the initial wrong has faced at all justice through capital punishment. When talking about the death penalty, the infamous hardened criminals like Ted Bundy, or John Wayne Gacy come to mind for most people. Many people find the crimes punishable by death to be so atrocious that capital punishment is the only logical option, but what happens…

    • 1477 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Death Penalty Synthesis

    • 776 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Some may argue that capital punishment should be used to remove the criminal because they are dangerous and they deserve to be executed but “the deed is done and taking another life cannot change” (Source A) the fact that one life is already gone. There are other ways of preventing the culprit from harming others, such as removing them for society by putting them in jail. Being sentenced to “life imprisonment is a far more practical form of retribution” (Source F) for the defendant; it’s much fairer, more efficient and a lot less cruel than execution. Citizens are just as safe when the criminal is in jail as they would be if capital punishment was used. Plus, if the criminal was eventually found guilty then they could be freed from jail.…

    • 776 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    If a crime is so heinous that death is even considered as a punishment, it would only make sense that the offender should not be allowed to take the easier punishment. Once a person dies, life is over. After death there is no lesson to be learned. Death is the end of the road. In his essay "The Penalty of Death", Mencken states "All of us long for a swift and unexpected end" (Mencken 472). Much worse than dying is sitting in a jail cell and contemplating what was done. Life without parole…

    • 562 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays