Preview

Argumentative Essay-Oh, Shoot !

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1737 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Argumentative Essay-Oh, Shoot !
Oh, Shoot! As stated by Margaret Van de Pitte, “Hunting and gun ownership continue to be associated with liberty, a very fundamental right indeed” (263). The exercise of deliberate stalking, observing, and killing of animals is a cherished pastime that positively impacts our world today. The base of traditional and cultural practices, hunting wild animals should remain legal due to the environmental and economic benefits. First, because of how commendably hunting directly and indirectly strengthens economies of all sizes, banning a vital source of income would cripple many cities, communities, and businesses worldwide. According to the state game officials of Montana, exactly “15,603 hunters bought wolf tags, including 89 nonresidents …show more content…
The hunting of wild animals is not only a more humane way of killing a living organism, but it is also healthier for the consumer as well. In his article “Considerations on the Morality of Meat Consumption: Hunted-Game versus Farm-Raised Animals”, author Donald W. Bruckner describes the slaughterhouse as “live cattle being shackled and hoisted while fully conscious after the ‘knocker’ failed to deliver an accurate blow to the head with his captive bolt stunning device”, and how the cattle “kick and thrash, causing severe injury to the ‘sticker’, the worker responsible for severing the animal’s carotid artery once it is stunned and hoisted” (319). Moreover, substituting meat sources from farm-raised animals to wild game one personally kills will allow for a deeper respect for the animal, as well as eliminating the danger of wounding and angering the animal that could be dangerous to whoever is in its presence. In this same article, Bruckner clarifies how there is “scientific evidence that animals unable to engage in some natural behaviors suffer stress, as indicated by increased levels of stress hormones” (314). Because the animal is being required to act unnaturally in confinement, it is putting heavy amounts of stress on this animal throughout the course of its life, depleting the quality of the meat for whoever is consuming it, proving …show more content…
Although there are exceptions of hunters not presented in this article, including those who kill animals solely for the “thrill of the hunt”, or just because sport hunting has gained popularity as modern firearms make it more convenient to kill. In her article “Sport Hunting Is an Unnecessary Form of Cruelty to Animals”, Dawn Laney argues that the practice of hunting for sporting purposes defeats the meaning of hunting and causes animals' pain and suffering in the last minutes of their lives. Some would agree with the fact that not every shot that a hunter makes is a kill shot; however, there are always reasons for the bullet to miss the intended target; like an unsighted scope, high winds, and movement of the animal when the shot is fired. Also, keeping farm–raised animals herded into confinement will result in unnecessary brutality; whipping and thrashing the animals for direction, branding the animal, gauging the ears for identification, and trapping them in quarters so tight they can hardly move. Furthermore, author and primatologist Jane Goodall stresses how hunting around the world is “driving species to extinction”. It cannot be denied that exotic animal hunting can lead to low population numbers, however in most cases, this is an act of poaching rather than hunting. A poacher is

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Dappled Grackle

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages

    He is forgetting the harmful effects of hunting and his assumptions are not well substantiated with any evidence. The writer is making an analogy that the same provisions as that of the Wayne County in the Gordon act can prevent the decline in these birds. The writer is assuming that similar environmental conditions exists in both these Counties. Here, the diversity of the species of birds,animal and trees in both must be considered and a detailed study is required which can predict the cause and effect if such amendments are made in the Gordon…

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    How do you feel about lions? Do you want them to be extinct? If we continue this type of hunting, every lion that you have ever seen will be gone. Also, this includes tigers, elephants, rhinos, and many more. Big Game Trophy Hunting is a danger to the environment due to population. You might say “Hunting provides food for us,” or “This helps keep the populations under control.” All of this might be true, but populations would even rise more if we kept…

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The activity of hunting wild animals for food has long been a practice of man. It is what we as humans survived off for thousands of years. An instinctual need to pursue game is still alive in many of us. Unfortunately, those who choose to fulfill this instinct are generally condemned for their actions. Now this may not seem to be such a serious deal, but I assure you there is much more to this situation than first meets the eye. The topic of hunting is very significant because it not only affects hunter’s rights, but it affects landscape, funding wildlife preservation, and tradition.…

    • 1317 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many animals endure prolonged, painful deaths when they are injured but not killed by hunters. What the author fails to consider is that most people that hunt are not hunting to just kill most are trying to feed there family or put meat in there fridge. According to peta the delicate balance of ecosystems ensures their survival if they are left unaltered. Natural predators help maintain this balance by killing only the sickest and weakest individuals. Hunters, however, kill any animal whose head they would like to hang over the fireplace including large, healthy animals who are needed to keep the population strong. Although this may be true the ecosystem is going to kill off populations a lot slower than kill animals such as deer are self, killing isn't bad if you using the deer for good causes.On private lands that are set up as for-profit hunting reserves or game ranches, hunters can pay to kill native and exotic species in “canned hunts.” This is true, but people that go out and hunt in canned hunts usually after they kill a deer they give the meat to share your harvest and help families in need.…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sport hunting is a topic that is highly debated in the US today. People have many different opinions on whether it should be illegal, or remain the same. I believe that sport hunting is unfair, not right, and should be illegal.…

    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Second of all Trophy hunting should be allowed for protection. In the Junior Scholastic article it states “ African’s are scared of lion”. About 200,000 live in Africa and many if them are dangerous. For example the junior scholastic article states “ Conflicts between human and animals rose 55 percent from 2012 to 2014”. My evidence is claiming that the conflict is rising and humans need protection. Sence trophy hunting is legal then thats a way for their protection.…

    • 410 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    As you’ve probably observed in the news, trophy hunting is a worldwide phenomenon. There have been various incidents that have been given enormous attention by people because of the drastic measures to kill animals. For instance, Cecil, a lion, was killed because of the orders of a dentist who payed $50,000 for its murder, which was senseless. Even though hunting animals is unacceptable, trophy hunting incorporates displaying the animals to demonstrate the success of a hunt, which portrays killing animals is satisfactory. The disconsolate part of it is the majority of people don’t pay attention to trophy hunting and its negative effects.…

    • 714 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    “The Facts About Hunting.” Friends of Animals And Their Benefits. Friends of Animals And Their Benefits, Web. 8 November 2013…

    • 1635 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    All animals should have the right to roam freely without being pursued and/or killed. Hunters cause injuries, pain and suffering to defenseless animals, they destroy their families and home, and leave…

    • 1485 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hunting and Wolves

    • 1830 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Hunters view this animal as a killing machine and “it considers them vermin” (Matsuoka). To make the situation worse the government is allowing the states to encourage these hunters to kill these wolves. For example, “Wisconsin will issue 1,160 permits for 116 animals. Minnesota will issue 6,000 permits for 400 animals” (Peralta). They think by allowing these hunters to kill these wolves is going to be a great benefit…

    • 1830 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Anyone that pushes gun control enjoys to tell stories how hunting animals is wrong, or how easy it is to gain access to a firearm. Unfortunately those accusations are true. The black market has made it so easy to get a hold of an illegal gun, but you can also get a kidney, lung or even jewelry. I understand why there are many concerns on the safety of the public, but taking self defence weapons are not the answer. If you are for gun control then you most likely against hunting, and the trapping of animals. There are several of cases of people illegally killing animals, such as endangered species. Elephants, tigers, and rhinos are considered as trophy animals to high class hunters. Polluters will pay thousands of dollars to go after trophy animals such as the ones listed above in the previous sentence. An elephant's tusk is worth a lot of money for the tusk of the endangered species, but all of the other parts of the animals is wasted and thrown out to root. It is very hard to protect endangered species when there are people out illegally killing them out of their own habitat that they are protected in. Many companies have invested in non-profit organizations to try to keep these endangered species home and safe place protected. When you hear of somebody getting shot it is…

    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hunters, however, will kill any animal whose head they would like to hang up on the wall, this includes large, healthy animals who are needed to keep the population strong. Even when unusual natural events cause overpopulation, natural processes work to maintain the group. Whilst starvation and disease can be tragic, they are nature’s ways of making sure that healthy, strong animals survive and preserve the strength of the rest of the species. Shooting an animal because he or she might starve or get sick is irrational and…

    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Should Hunting be considered inhumane? Deer collisions kill over 200 motorists, costing around $10 billion a year. Hunters take 6 to 7 deer for everyone highway-killed deer. Seventy eight percent of Americans have a favorable view of hunting. More and more people are realizing that hunting is a necessary tool and not just an outdated…

    • 364 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    HUnting laws

    • 352 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I understand why some people are against hunting, I mean when you only know part of the story all you hear is killing an innocent animal. And some people only see the stereotype a think it’s just a bunch of banjo stringing rednecks going Rambo on Bambi's mom. But there are several laws and regulations keeping all hunting safe and even necessary to keep species size under control. I have hunted all my life, and I've learned most of my life lessons sitting on the cold ground with a 30.6 in my hands waiting for an elk to pass by. So hunting is a part of me, my family doesn’t hunt to just kill an animal, every piece of meat we eat is either a cow from our pasture or elk we killed during hunting season. That is the meat we eat all year, so even though I know why we hunt and why it’s not bad I understand why some people think it might be barbaric. I'm also not saying that some people don't disrespect the right to hunt and kill anything they see, just like anti-hunters think.…

    • 352 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Do we need guns to hunt? Hunting in America provides food for lower income families. It teaches survival skills and has historically been a right of passage for boys to become men. I argue that this is the 21st century we have Wal-Mart’s and tons of grocery stores around the country. Why does it have to make you a man to kill something? I understand that it saves money for families but how long does it take to hunt a deer, kill it, take the fur off, gut the animal then butcher it? I feel this time could be better spent working and earning money to pay for food at Wal-Mart. Thus putting money back into the economy generating growth for America and possibly being us out of recession . Also I have the idea that if there was a large enough demand for deer meat then why don’t we farm the animals? Most hunters are also farmers so instead of hunting the animals why don’t the farm them for their meat? At some point cows must have been wild. This would then give farmers another revenue stream allowing them to better spend their time other than hunting. To answer the other point that I brought up the survival skills, what do we need them for anymore? We have cell phones that tell us exactly where we are and hunting with gun just doesn’t seem fair.…

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays