Preview

Juveniless Death Penalty

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1577 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Juveniless Death Penalty
Juveniles and the Death Penalty

Introduction to Corrections

Stephanie L. Calvert

December 15, 2007

Juveniles and the death penalty is a hotly debated issue in the criminal justice system. There are two different views on the death penalty some are for and some are against the punishment. Some see juveniles as young and influential and deserve a second chance to clean up and become a productive member of society, while others feel the punishment should fit the crime; no matter what age.

To better understand this issue, let’s start with an explanation of the death penalty. The term death penalty has only meaning, and that meaning is putting a condemned person to death. This is the ultimate punishment for those convicted of
…show more content…
This amendment was adopted in 1869 after the Civil War and “intended to incorporate the ‘privileges and immunities’ enumerated in the Bill of Rights at the level of the states, and compel state authorities to ensure ‘equal protection of the laws’ for all their citizens.” (Oxford University Press 1992, 2005) This amendment was put into place mainly due to the abolishment of slavery after the civil war to ensure African Americans equal protection, but it states that all citizens of the United States are ensured equal protection from and under the law. (Oxford University Press …show more content…
I think of troubled youth that are influential still in their behaviors, but still know the difference between right and wrong. The same as well with a 16 or 17 year old juvenile. Many, when asked this, would think of their own children and see nothing wrong. That their children do know what is right and what is wrong. The above juveniles mentioned in the cases probably did know that what they were doing was wrong, but had a criminal past behind them that fueled these heinous acts. For their actions, they were sentenced to death. Many feel that the sentence imposed be wrong due to the ages of the defendants. Yet, the states overruled them in saying that the Eighth Amendment was not violated. I support the death penalty, and feel that the court followed all procedures and the sentence imposed was just. In conclusion, I feel that the punishment should fit the crime, and the punishment in these cases has.

Bibliography

Champion, D. (2004). The Juvenile Justice System-Deliquency, Processing, and the Law 4th ed. . Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall .

Cornell University. (1992,1998,2005). Cornell University Law School. Retrieved 12 December, 2007, from Cornell.edu: http://supct.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/historics/USSC_CR_0492_0361_ZO.html

Flaherty, L. T. (2002). Summary of Thompson V. Oklahoma 487 U.S. 815 (1998). American Psychiarty , 1-4.

Law Dictionary.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Don’t let the innocent looks and actions of kids and teenagers fool you. Never under estimate the knowledge of kids and youths due to their first impression, the way they look, dress and act. I believe teenagers should be tried and sentenced as adults. If teenagers believe they could get away with cruel crimes, then I believe they are capable of being able to handle the consequences of an adult act and behavior.…

    • 619 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The topic about executing Juveniles legally is an unsure topic, which is very discussable. The first know killed Juvenile offender, happened in 1642. He was legally executed, his name is Thomas Graunger. Since that execution 361 individuals have since gotten the death penalty There is a lot of arguing about this topic and people can´t get to a solution, this works out for everybody. There are people for keeping the death penalty for juveniles offenders and then there are those against as well.…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although the Supreme Court ruled is as a “cruel and unusual punishment,” the sentence if fair because the convicted committed an act of murder that took away another person’s life. Such an example is Greg Ousley, who purposely murdered his parents and planned the murder days before he committed it (Greg Ousely Is Sorry, 9). Unlike previous scenarios mentioned, Ousley purposely planned for the murder of his parents. Despite the fact that he was still a teenager when he committed the murder, he had an intention to silence his parents and killed both of them in cold blood. This greatly differs from the previous convicted juveniles who accidentally killed their victims. Juveniles that have motives such as Ousley should be convicted as an adult and be sentenced a life in prison because, despite their age, they can think and act like an adult. Because of this, the Supreme Court’s decision of disallowing “teenagers” from “cruel and unusual punishments” should be overturned on certain cases, because, as seen in Ousely, some teenagers are capable and can plan murders beforehand. This not only reveals that certain teenagers can plan beforehand, but that they can think like adults in order to murder someone with…

    • 904 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I don’t think there is one juvenile living that is ready to be in a prison environment, it’s not anything that you can train for and I am also concerned about if the juvenile will receive the proper medical and mental health services. But for a juvenile to be on death row is very disturbing. Juveniles are young and juveniles haven’t gotten a chance to explore and actually live their life so this is a sad scenario. I don’t think there is any crime even a homicide or armed robbery is worth putting a juvenile on death row. The judge should have some sympathy and issue out a split sentence before even considering death row for a juvenile. The famous quote “if you can’t do the time don’t do the crime” is very serious but I think the system should be lenient and have some sympathy for…

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On June 25, 2012, the Supreme Court ruled that juveniles who committed murder could not be sentenced to life in prison. A few justices believed life in prison without parole for a juvenile prevents consideration for their chronological age and its features. But four justices disagreed saying that heinous crimes committed by juveniles should be punished with a sentence of life in prison, or a 17-year-old would be released to society after he had gun down his fellow classmates and teachers. I disagree with the Supreme Court ruling. I believe that every juvenile who has committed a heinous crime should be sentenced to life in prison without parole. The victims of the crime would get the justice they deserve, they are at the age where they should know what they are doing, and brain development does not play a fact to juveniles committing heinous crimes .…

    • 865 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Juveniles should not be let off easy because it increase that chances of it occurring again because they did not receive the punishment. The consequences of a juvenile's action should not be determined by race, ethnicity, gender and color of skin as well as economic status. We shouldn’t their enablers, we should let know and experience that every single action has it’s consequence. If teens can plan a murder confess it and not feel any remorse they should also be given the proper punishment and face time in prison. I do not think it is wrong, I believe that it is just to trial a juvenile as an…

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Champion, Dean John. “The Juvenile Justice System: Delinquency, Processing, and the Law.” Person Prentice Hall, 2007. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.…

    • 2130 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Life is too precious to be thrown away and sometimes people make wrong choices at an early age, but that does not mean that it should affect the rest of their life. Sometimes people make wrong choices at a young age that if an adult were to commit, would affect them to several years in prison or even life. When a youth commits a crime, they are considered juveniles and are dealt with the Juvenile Justice Department. The Juvenile Justice Department decides what kind of punishment the Juvenile gets and in some cases, they are waivered into adult court and punished the same way an adult would be punished. It is right to punish a juvenile with sufficient amount of punishment, but to punish them the same way as an adult is wrong after teaching them…

    • 1217 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Juveniles Unfit for Trial

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Juvenile crime is very wide spread within our country. Juveniles commit crimes every day; whether it’s stealing candy from a store or stealing a life. Those who commit such heinous acts such as taking someone’s life should be sentenced to life in prison or in some cases, death. But the question still stands: what if it is an adolescent who murdered somebody, should they be sentenced to life in prison or even sentenced to walk death row? I believe that juveniles should not receive life in prison but rather an evaluation on their mental health to see why they acted in such a way.…

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Ten year old boy murders his family. Does he get out when he turns eighteen, because he knows not what he did? Or does he spend the rest of his life in prison? Sometimes teenagers are tried for crimes as adults and face equal penalties that are subject to adults. This is a controversial issue among americans. There are two groups of people. Those who believe that teenagers under the age of eighteen who commit serious crimes should be held responsible as adults for their actions. Courts are said to be too lenient and the young juveniles are evolving into violent youth criminals; And there are those who suggest that teenagers are less likely to understand the consequences of their actions and more likely to become productive citizens if the criminal justice system continues to treat eighteen year olds as juveniles. Juvenile death penalties and life sentences without parole have increased at an estimated rate of three times higher today than fifteen years ago. The youth are still growing to become fully developed, like an adult. There are many cases where tough decisions have to be made and choices must be made by officials. In my opinion all youths at the age of eighteen or younger should be tried as juveniles and all our juvenile courts need to focus more on rehabilitation for the lost of youth to criminal acts. Age should be a factor, not a determinant on how these youths should be tried.…

    • 2098 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    Juvenile Death Penalty

    • 1324 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Capital Punishment, or the penalty of death for crimes committed by a defendant, is a controversial topic in today’s society. In general, the public associates this method of punishment with adult offenders who commit heinous crimes. What about the defendants who are not adults? In some states, defendants as young as 16 years old have been tried as adults and eligible to receive the death penalty. Juveniles are being punished as adults, yet, in every other aspect of the law, they are not held to the same standards. Is it public outcry for justice to be served that allows for such a consequence for our children or should the juvenile justice system be responsible for implementing measures that protect our children from punishments of death?…

    • 1324 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    One of the most controversial issues in the rights of juveniles today is addressed in the question, Should the death penalty be applied to juveniles? For nearly a century the juvenile courts have existed to shield the majority of juvenile offenders from the full weight of criminal law and to protect their entitled special rights and immunities. In the case of kent vs. United states in 1996, Justice Fortas stated some of these special rights which include; Protection from publicity, confinement only to twenty-one years of age, no confinement with adults, and protection against the consequences of adult conviction such as the loss of civil rights, the use of adjudication against him in subsequent proceedings and disqualification of public employment (Kent vs. US 1966:1055). These special rights and immunities exist so that the justice courts can provide measures of guidance and rehabilitation for the child along with protection for society. However, there are some youths who are extremely dangerous and do not respond to attempts to reform themselves. The question is, should established mechanisms for transferring or waiving juvenile court jurisdiction in these exceptional cases take away these special rights and subject the youth to the full range of penalties for criminal behavior including, in some jurisdictions, execution (Thomson vs. State, 1986:784) ? Should These juveniles who perform the same malicious acts as some adult capital offenders be subject to the harshness of the criminal courts and the finality of the death penalty ? This paper will discuss a history of capital punishment for juveniles in the United States, methods of transferring juvenile cases to criminal courts, and also my position on the subject and justice of justice of juveniles and the death penalty. The constitutionality of the juvenile death penalty reached a settlement in 1988 in the case of Thompson v. Oklahoma when four Supreme Court Justices reached the conclusion that: persons under…

    • 2058 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Week 5 --in Class Hw

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages

    I think that juveniles should be charged as adults if an adult crime is committed. In the constitution it states that it’s not appropriate for a child under 16 to receive capital punishment; which I agree with completely. I think that things that can be handled efficiently for that age group. Something realistic would be serving in a juvenile facility until turning 18 and then deciding what to do then. In some cases the charges are dropped and they are released from custody. If the child understands that what was done was wrong and can be held responsible, than they should be charged like an adult would.…

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    References: American Psychological Association. Roper. D.P. v. Simmons, C. (2004). Brief from the Psychological Association, & Missouri Psychological Association. as Amici Curiae supporting respondent July 2004. Retrieved May 20, 2011 from http://www.apa.org/about/offices/ogc/amicus/roper.pdf…

    • 1411 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Juveniles who commit first or second degree murder should not receive a mandatory sentence of life without parole. The majority of supreme court justices believes that it should not be mandatory to sentence juveniles to life without parole because violates the eighth amendment. The Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution states that excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted. What's the point of the United States Constitution if its not being used in the supreme court system. Teens should not be charged with a life sentence because teens do not have the same rights as an adult and a teenager's brain is not fully developed until age twenty-nine, additional research has found that adult and teen brains work differently.…

    • 927 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays