The Han Empire was very interested in advancing technology and systems as much as possible. They were always looking for improvement, such as the letter a Han government official sent to other officials about improving the irrigation systems and flood prevention systems. (Doc.1) Water was a very important element to the Han Empire as it helped shape their new inventions and new takes on already established technologies. (Doc.3,4,8) The Han Empire had governmental as well as high ranking philosophical backing in their drive to advance their technology. A document that would help reinforce this analysis would be a letter from a government official asking other officials from around the world about any advances they would be willing to share. The Romans did not view technology as a tool, but a hindrance. High ranking officials and wealthy gentlemen viewed any kind of job that required the use of technology or tools was degrading and vulgar. They thought that there was nothing noble or gentlemanly about the work of the lower classes. (Doc.5,7) This shows Rome’s attitude towards technology is very negative and it is not a common interest among other Romans. Despite the fact that Rome did use technology, it was not a very high priority in Roman society. A document that could help support my claim would be a list of technological advancements over the course of many years showing how little new technology has shown up in everyday life. While both Empires had different attitudes toward the advancement of technology, they each accepted technological changes throughout history. Whether it be the new system of roads that Rome integrated (Doc.6) or the change in quality of tools in the Han Empire (Doc.2). They each had technological changes happen and both Empires accepted them even though the attitudes toward them were much different. The Han Empire embraced the changes and invention of new technology while the Roman Empire resented technological change.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Everyday, since the beginning of humanity people have been comparing. Whether it be two people, or two objects, it is always a comparison between two things to see what one thing has and what the other does not have. An example of this could be two stores like a Dollar Store or a Staples. Both have items needed for school or work, but one just puts more effort into ensuring that their product is at its best for their customers, while the other simply wants to make a profit. This is similar to the technology and works of the Han and Roman Empire. Both had several advances to their technologies but both had differences in them and separate purposes in these technological advancements. Both empires had different attitudes about their technology but also thought of themselves the same way. They believed they were the best empire of their time and everyone around…
- 961 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The Hans and the Romans both had very fascinating views on their technology. While The Han’s attitude toward technology was viewed as a positive contribution to their society the Romans had positive views other Romans had negative attitudes. Every document has its own opinions on the way they appreciate technology some support which is making then look good, while some think it’s for low class people and not for government. In order to fully analyze Han and Roman attitudes toward technology it would have been helpful to have an additional document of an interview with a Roman laborer because all of the other documents were from higher class Romans who did not work with tools and such technology.…
- 554 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The Han Dynasty attitude towards technology is positive and negative feelings towards society even though Rome expressed the same feelings. These 8 documents can help prove and provide evidence for my thesis. In (doc 1) and (doc 4) explain how the Han Dynasty used water for positive things. In (doc 2) and (doc 3) explain the negative perceptions, which are how tools of the first century B.C.E were good enough to use but were neutrally valued, but overtime the quality of the item decreased.…
- 707 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Technology is the building block of any society: it allows for new advancements to be made that improve daily life. Two such societies that made advancements in technology included the Han Dynasty and the Roman Empire. As the expansion of the empire increased, the Romans built roads that linked these regions together. These roads were built in such a way that allowed for easier travel: roads were paved and allowed for water to run off. In addition, the empire also developed the transportation of water throughout the city through the construction of aqueducts, which were canals. Likewise, the Han Dynasty made advancements in the distribution of water: there were water ways, canals, and pools that were inspected by hydraulic engineers. Water was also used to power a blowing-engine. Because of the advancements that were made, the Han Dynasty is regarded by historians as the “Golden Age.” Similarly, the Romans created a large empire that stretched from Europe to the Middle East. Because of the vastness of both empires, water and technology were heavily relied upon, yet unlike the Han officials, the upper-class Romans had a negative attitude towards technology.…
- 1236 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
The Romans challenged the efficiency of basic tools that were invented. In document one, Cicero, an upper-class Roman political leader, states that “all craftsmen spend their time in vulgar occupations; no workshop can have anything enlightening about it.” What Cicero mean by this is that the people who make tools lack sophistication and that workshops can not, in any way, be useful. In document seven, Seneca, an upper-class Roman Philosopher and adviser to Empor Nero, believed that tools were “invented by someone with a mind that was nimble and sharp, but not great or elevated.” He believed tools were a clever, but there were other things that are way more important.…
- 320 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Rome and China were somewhat different in religion, but were very different in technology. China was based on production and Rome was based on architecture and building. While Rome was creating arches and inventing concrete, China was creating a watermill and inventing paper and the seismometer. Both were unique in these ways but agreed that roads were very important. Roads connected empires across the hemisphere and allowed quick transportation for armies. Neither Rome nor China could ignore building roads because they are the key to expanding an empire.…
- 517 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
After studying the provided documents (#1-8) its come to my understanding that both the Han and Roman empires thought of technology as useful and somewhat revolutionary, but both of them had somewhat different feelings of it. The Han dynasties attitude toward technology was that they thought it was very benefical, and they admired it. The reason this was because they though it to be very helpful in agriculture and construction purposes. Evidence of the positive effects of this can be seen in Document 4: History of the Early Han Dynasty which tells of a governer of Nanynay and as the very generous and loving person he was his policies also refelcted his personality. He had so much love for his people he wanted to lift weight of their shoulders and make their lives a little easier by inventing a water-powered blowing-engine which was enjoyed by eveyone adopted and spread his invention. The Roman empire however were not as positive about technology as the Hans. Even though they appreciated it to some extent the main viewpoint from the documents suggested that they thought of it was a bit demeaning also. Evidence can be found in Document 7, written by an upper-class Roman philospher and adviser which was saying that he did not believe that tools were created by "wise men" meaning a very developed mind, or someone who was thinking outside the box. He believe like the hammer for instance was created by a simple minded human, though its a very popular tool it was not advanced a tool as it could've been.…
- 903 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The Han Dynasty viewed technology as a way to ease the workload. A Han government official proposes a possible technological solution to prevent floods. His ideas include people to watch over the machinery used to ease the workload of people preventing floods. Huan Guan, in his "Discourses on Salt and Iron", says that in previous times, people had the liberty to do foundry work and salt-boiling, but had to pay a tax. He says that the tools to do this work used to be well-made, but in current times the tools are made by convicts, and are crude and not very functional. Due to the high price of these crude tools, which do not do much to ease the workload, many people have become poor, and are forced to rely on wooden tools, and cannot afford salt. Huan Tan, in his "New Discourses", says that Fuxi, a mythological emperor, created mortar and pestle. he also says that, over time, other things were used and upgrades were made in order to increase the benefit and decrease the workload hundredfold. The government-sponsored "History of the Early Han Dynasty" claims that Tu Shih loved the common people and wished to save them labor, so he invented a water-powered-blowing-engine. This saved them time, and effort.…
- 626 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Thematic Essay: Technology History has seen its fair share of technological innovations that were significant and impactful to the people and society of that time period. These advancements in technology brought about monumental changes, for good and for worse. An example of a noteworthy innovation was Johann Gutenberg’s printing press. During the Renaissance, the printing press played a key role in the spreading of new ideas. The use of roads was a technological innovation as well. During the reign of the Roman Empire, roads impacted humankind in multiple aspects of life, such as trade and transportation. After the study of the printing press during the Renaissance, and roads of the Roman Empire, one could make an argument that each was a significant technological innovation and had effects on their respective time periods.…
- 608 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Evidence was presented to support the idea that the Romans utilized their technology only for its beauty and aesthetics which embodies some negatives and positives . Almost all of the documents had positive…
- 504 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Now in the Roman Empire, the advancements made were not water or agricultural related, they were advancements in tools and crafts. Cicero, an upper-class political leader, believed that the invention of tools had a great impact on the dignity of men. In Rome, men were held to a certain degree of gentlemen…
- 855 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Essay: The Roman and the Han were by far the most technologically advanced civilizations of their time. The time period for both of the societies depicted whether or not the people were inclined to their advancements or not. Much evidence goes to show that both the Roman and Han societies attitudes towards technology in B.C.E. were more negative and in C.E. they leaned more positive. In the documents given, it is evident that during the B.C.E. both the Roman and Han’s attitude toward their technologies were negative. Little did they know how helpful they would turn out to be and how they would revolutionize the world forever. This is first apparent from an excerpt from a Han government official. He states that they need more water conservation offices that are staffed with people who are experienced to aid the local community with the floods (doc. 1). This exemplifies that the people were dissatisfied with the lack of officials to keep the community organized and free of danger. This negative theme is also seen in a passage written by a Han government official (Han Guan) who is complaining about the iron tools and how they were made better when they were made individually by the common people rather than mass-produced by the state. He also touches on the fact that salt and iron prices have sky rocketed so the common people could not afford to season their food and make tools for themselves…
- 1174 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
The Roman dynasty admired technology, but scorned those who made a living working on crafts. During the 1st century C.E, upper-class Roman philosopher expresses how he does not believe tools made for craft was invented by wise men. (Doc 7) He doesn’t think a wise person would think of inventing a certain tool for craft. In the 1st century C.E, upper-class Roman politician also expresses how nothing about a workshop can be enlightening, along with how degrading it…
- 495 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
To begin with, in the Han Empire it was believed that Fuxi, a mythological wise emperor, invented pestle and mortar and that later on they were improved to withstand the whole weight of the body. This shows how the ancient Chinese used their intellect to advance themselves; they saw that their materials were not as strong as they needed to be so they bettered them to get them up to standards (Doc. 3). In contrast, the Romans were retarded in their advancements because of the way they looked at different jobs, some as degrading and vulgar. They didn’t like to take ideas from people that were in a lower social class because that’d make them unrefined as well (Doc.5). Gaius Gracchus was a very wise man; he was an expert at designing roads to maximize mobility. He paid close attention to the smallest details and he made sure everything was as perfect as possible. The idea of the road was to fix the problem of the time it took to get from place to place. It was important to receive the perspective of Plutarch because it shows that even as a bloody thirsty Roman official, he appreciated the art of road building (Doc. 6). Also, in order to make sure there was plenty of water in Rome they built extensive aqueducts. These aqueducts were very efficiently built, a special cement that hardened as water ran over it was invented by the Romans to strengthen these marvelous structures (Doc. 8). Both of these great empires had intellectual views towards technology…
- 989 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Greeks and Romans were notorious in their disdain for technology. Aristotle noted that to be engaged in the mechanical arts was "illiberal and irksome." Seneca infamously characterized invention as something fit only for "the meanest slaves." The Roman Emperor Vespasian rejected technological innovation for fear that it would lead to unemployment.…
- 1775 Words
- 8 Pages
Good Essays