November 1, 2013
6th Period
The Similarities and Differences of the Imperial Rule of Han China and Imperial Rome
Imperial Han and Imperial Rome were two very important empires in Europe and Asia. Even though their time in ruling was different they both were very powerful in their time. The Imperial Rules of Rome and Han China had differences and similarities in the techniques of imperial administration such as different ways of religion, Confucianism and Christianity, similar social aspects because of patriarchy as well as economic similarities such as trade in the Silk Road.
Han China and Rome did not have the same beliefs, Rome believed in Christianity while Han China believed in Confucianism. (DIF) Han Chinas belief brought the empire to unity under Han Wudi’s Ruling for 54 years. As opposed to Rome where their belief tore the empire apart. When Christianity triumphed the Edict of Milan was proclaimed under the ruling of Theodosius the Great. (EV) As the Romans tried to send out the message of Jesus the Romans had been persecuting the religion. Constantine ends the persecution in 313 ad, as he became the first Christian Emperor. This followed the Jewish Diaspora, the dispersal of Jews from their homeland because the temples were being destroyed. Christianity brought the Roman Empire to an end by dividing it into two, the Jewish and the Christians. These empires had very distinct types of ruling in the aspect of Religion which led them to either success or failure just by a believe.
Social orders in both of the empires were actually similar. Imperial Rome and Han China were dominated under Patriarchy. Both Empires also had issues with taxes, which was the main reason why they practiced a patriarchal system. (DC) Han China was very dedicated to filial piety. Young children have to honor their parents and bring honor to their families. This link with Imperial Rome’s Paterfamilias, which is basically the same thing as filial piety, you must bring honor to your family and give your undivided honor to the eldest member of your family. With the Patriarchal system it was a must to honor the eldest male of the family, which was usually the dad. This was something very important and was brought to the empires by their rulers at that time. Taxes were also an issue in both empires. (DC) Taxes were lowered which left them with more money and made women stand out. Empress Lu came in 195 BCE to rule China. (AN) This also caused people to work more and in Rome latifundia came up.
Trade in the Silk Road was the main similarity for these empires. In the Famous Silk Road that connected China with the Roman Empire cultures, ideas, religions and technology was spread. China exported paper, silk, alcohol, iron, and salt. Rome imported silver, gold, luxurious items in such as silk, jades, expensive rocks, horses, wheat. The Han Empire then created monopolies to increase their power. While Rome was running on mostly the Silk Road exchanges. The economy of both empires was based off agriculture. (DC) Also taxes were playing a big role in the Economic aspect of the empires. With the lowered taxes woman had more opportunities, when the taxes were high it meant more work.
In conclusion Imperial Rome and Han China basically had the same foundation to ruling. Their Economic and Social beliefs were similar, but their Religious beliefs differed making them be ran different. The techniques of imperial administration varied but were basically the same too.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
For the differences, Rome was followed up by another great civilization; the Byzantine Empire, while Han China was divided up into separate states after the empire fell. Rome managed to conquer regions…
- 180 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
Imperial Rome and Han China had some similarities and differences in their foundation. In the eight century B.C.E., Rome began as a small city-state on the western side of Italy. Originally they were a monarchy but in 509 B.C.E. they knocked off the monarchy and made themselves republic. In their republic system, the wealthy class, known as patricians, dominated. The lower class was called plebeians. The Romans had laws that protected the lower class form abuse. The Romans took great pride in their system, believing it gave them more freedom. With this political system, the Romans launched their empire, a process that took more than 500 years. The Chinese were not building a new empire yet they were restoring the old. The Chinese empire started as early as 2200 B.C.E. By 5oo B.C.E. the Chinese state was in shambles which they considered as the warring states, which were seven kingdoms within the Chinese government fighting against each other. China finally reunified in 221 B.C.E. Han China and Imperial Rome are similar because they both flourished at about the same time (200 B.C.E. – 200 C.E.), conquered about the same amount of land (about 1.5 million square miles), and had about the same population (50 to 60 million). The reason for the similarities and differences in the foundation in both of the empires was because Rome was a new empire while the Han dynasty was just restoring the old but they were still the dame due to their similarity in the time era both empires flourished, they occupied a similar area, and they contained a similar population.…
- 644 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
The Han Dynasty and the Roman Empire both had a great influence not only on its people but the world as a whole. The two had similar and different methods of political control. Both ruled their people under a bureaucracy, they had civil servants to maintain their large empires, and their foundations were made of great and strong rulers. Aside from the similarities they also had several differences. Take China for example, they focused more on Confucianism and they had a Mandate of Heaven. Rome on the other hand used entertainment to distract and control the masses of its population.…
- 1170 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Since Imperial Rome and the Han dynasty were taking places at relatively the same time, they have many similarities. But considering the distance and isolation from each other, many differences also occurred. Both Rome and Han China used technology to improve their empire, but changing your social class rank was very difficult in China, but a bit easier in Rome.…
- 366 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Imperial Rome and Han China are both well recognized empires, known as strong and fairly successful. Although the empires had some differences they also had similarities in their methods of political control. Similarities between these empires include the belief that leaders had connections to God, religious tolerance, and public works provided to citizens. Along with the similarities in political control the differences include Rome having a democracy while China had a centralized bureaucracy, Rome had lesser domestic repercussions while China had harsh punishments, and Rome offered assimilation to become a citizen while China did not need to offer assimilation because it conquered states that were already chinese.…
- 640 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The Han dynasty and Roman Empire are somewhat similar and also have some differences. Both civilizations have very strong central governments which allowed for powerful and expanding kingdoms. One of the main differences between the two empires was their religions. The Roman Empire and Han dynasty were has lots of inventions and technology. Roman and Han dynasty built major roads to help support a growing dependence on trade. In Han dynasty women were had limited to domestic activities. They also have arranged marriages. Whereas in roman dynasty women had right to do everything.…
- 576 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The Classical empires of Rome and Han had similar and different means of imperial administration. Both empires focused on centralized administration and military expansion. They also concentrated on maintaining a full bureaucracy to help the empire prosper.…
- 961 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
This paper will compare similarities and the differences of the Roman and Han Dynasty empires. It will compare their creation, maintenance, culture, and decline.…
- 342 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
The Han and the Romans both had very passive views when it came to technology, both sharing the "good is good enough" mindset. This appears through people of high class wanting higher quality materials and laborers, the Han enjoying a superb invention but not outwardly seeking to improve it, as well as the Romans appreciated fantastic inventions without searching for ways to improve…
- 64 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
Rome and Han China were classical civilizations that built centralized empires, which eventually expanded. Both Rome and Han experienced unequal land distribution which led to political instability, and both suffered from invasions of nomadic tribes due to political instability which would lead to the collapse. However, only the western portion of the Roman Empire collapsed whereas the entire Han met its demise.…
- 935 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The massively extensive classical empires of Imperial Rome (31BCE-476CE) and Han China (206BCE-220CE) were extremely influential when it came to the world around them. In essence, the two empires were virtually the same in terms of political structure and military protocols, yet greatly different in the area of religious tolerance.…
- 733 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The Roman Empire and the Han Dynasty had a lot in common, but they also have many differences. For instance, the Roman Empire relied heavily on slave (mostly prisoners of war) labor, but the Han Dynasty relied greatly on free peasant labor. Although both the Roman Empire and the Han Dynasty had a well organized bureaucracy, the Han Dynasty had bureaucracy based upon Confucian ideology. Also the Han Dynasty did not have paved roads, where as the Roman Empire constructed many paved roads (which was because the romans discovered concrete).…
- 369 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
rome and hans political administration and cultural challenges was very intersting. While rome and han created cultural and administrative difficulties that led to their downfall of there empires they still left a big mark on how to become a succersor empire. Rome and Han empires were very different on there administrative views. The romans chose there leader and all the people were taxed equally and more interregional interactive, they were kind of like a democracy, unlike han where everything was based on the social system. The han dynasty power was passed down the family so you basically had to be born into the elite class, they were also taxed on class and very divided this upset some people and later on lead to the yellow turban rebellion and was one reason for the downfall. the reason they were like this was because the empores had varying justification for living. Since both empires were so large the voume of long distance trade increased dramatically. They traded luxury goods, food, crops, technology, cultural beliefs, and also disease pathogens. The diseases were a huge part of the collapse of both empires because so many people were dying and the people that werent dying were angry. The empires wanted to intergrate rapidly but they did not think there would be this much chaos. They were similar in many ways though. Both empires had very popular leaders. For rome they had constantine who endorsed chrisitnaity and wanted to make peace with the other religions in rome, he also funded buildings and built churches. For the Han Empire their leader was Bhuda who also legalized buddhism and founded buildings, built monastraires, roads and rest stops. Both the leaders wanted unity and peace and they also gained popularity which led to all there followers and there…
- 300 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Both imperial Rome and Han China had a complex political system which was called a bureaucracy in which they established long periods of peace and prosperity within their empires. The Roman government leadership type was a strange mixture of democracy and the roman republic; in which the true power was held, having the wealthiest people appointed to the Roman senate and Roman republic. In contrast the Han dynasty was a monarchy in which the eldest male within the royal family was appointed emperor upon the decline of the current emperor succeeding him, keeping power confined in the blood lines. Both empires reached immense status of power both differently such as the Han dynasty being more unified, centralized and the emperor ruled following the mandate of heaven. Meanwhile the Romans where more of a republican city state which the emperor had limited power due to the fact that he had to pay homage to traditions.…
- 615 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Any political structure we have today was derived from one of the two most prominent structures in the beginning of the first empires. Both the Roman and the Chinese empire had a centralized control over a large mass of regions and populations. Although they had generally the same amount to control, they ran them differently. The Chinese empire was a dictated government where as the Romans had more independence with the law. The Chinese also used a bureaucracy system to hold them together rather than using an applicable body of law like the Romans. Both these empires had similarities, but at the same time had major differences that have shaped them into what they are today.…
- 612 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays