Preview

Analysis of Article on 4th Amendment

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
992 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Analysis of Article on 4th Amendment
Review: " Suspect Searches: Assessing Police Behavior Under the U.S. Constitution" The article "Suspect Searches: Assessing Police Behavior Under the U.S. Constitution," by Gould and Mastrofski explores the police usage of unconstitutional searches. Unconstitutional searches are those that are in violation of the fourth amendment. The fourth amendment rights, along with certain case laws put forth the guidelines for legal stops, frisks, and searches. Gould and Mastrofski perform a direct observation study which concludes the frequency of unconstitutional searches. This article puts police procedure under the spotlight and investigates the factors that seemingly increase the likelihood that an officer would engage in unlawful searches. In some cases, differentiating between constitutional and unconstitutional searches can be a difficult task, while in other situations police officers may obviously infringe on citizens ' rights. Any violation of rights poses many serious implications and consequences for policing, especially when it comes to effective community oriented policing. The police searches are governed by the fourth amendment that provides protection against illegal search and seizure and requires that the issuing of warrants is based on probable cause. Gould and Mastrofski focus on warrant less searches. A legal search must be based on the concept of probable cause. As cited in our text book, The Police, probable cause is information that is "sufficient in themselves to warrant a man of reasonable caution in the belief that an offense has been or is being committed" (as cited, Brinegar v United States, 1949). A police officer must make a determination about probable cause based on the totality of the circumstances, in each and every situation. Without the existence of probable cause prior to a search, that search would be held unconstitutional and any evidence gained will usually be omitted from trial, with few exceptions. Being able to


Bibliography: Gould, Jon B, and Mastrofski, Stephen D.   "Suspect Searches: Assessing Police Behavior Under The U.S. Constitution." Criminology & Public Policy Vol. 3.  Issue 3. (Jul. 2004): p315-351. Lyman, Michael D.  The Police: An Introduction  3rd ed.  New Jersey:  Pearson Education Inc., 2005.  Pp.159- 162,177,207-215,270-271.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Best Essays

    Bowling, B. and Phillips C., (2007) “Disproportionate and Discriminatory: Reviewing the Evidence on Police Stop and Search”. Modern Law Review. 70(6)…

    • 4485 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Public Image Of Police

    • 39327 Words
    • 158 Pages

    When the public perceives major threats to the nation’s security, the overwhelming majority appear willing to give additional powers to the police that invade privacy and restrict liberty, but substantial portions of the public are also concerned about the possibility of police abuses of these powers.…

    • 39327 Words
    • 158 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This work POL 303 Week 2 Discussion Questions 1 4th Amendment comprises solution of the following task: "What rights are protected by the 4th Amendment? Provide three concrete examples. Why are unreasonable searches forbidden? What factors determine whether a search is reasonable or not? Explain in 200…

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Weeks Vs United States

    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages

     Practical: Arguments  Weeks’ view: The 4th Amendment states that people are safe from unreasonable and searches without a warranty. And any evidence obtained from illegal an search is illegal. Federal officials should not be able to break the law in order to enforce the law.  United States’ view: An arrest was made in connection with a search, and further searches produced further evidence of illegal activity.…

    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1, do you think the conduct of the officer is a "search" within the 4th Amendment requiring a warrant? Why or why not?…

    • 171 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution states that “[t]he right of people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized” (U.S. Const. amend. IV). When the Fourth Amendment rights of citizens are violated, the criminal justice system enforces the exclusionary rule, which seeks to discourage law enforcement officers from using improper or illegal investigative procedures. In Mapp v. Ohio, the U.S. Supreme Court concluded that the exclusionary rule was…

    • 939 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    stop and frisk policy

    • 761 Words
    • 4 Pages

    These practices prompted angry reactions among minority citizens that widened the breach between different racial/ethnic groups in their trust in the police (Lundman and Kaufman 2003; Tyler and Huo 2003;Weitzer and Tuch 2002), provoking a crisis of legitimacy with legal, moral, and political dimensions (see Wang 2001; Russell 2002; Harris 2002). In an era of declining crime rates, policy debates on policing strategies often pivot on the evaluation of New York City’s policing strategy during the 1990s, a strategy involving aggressive stops and searches of pedestrians for a wide range of crimes (Eck and Maguire 2000; Skogan and Frydl 2004). The policy was based on the lawful practice of “temporarily detaining, questioning, and, at times, searching civilians on the street” (Spitzer 1999). The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled police stopand- frisk procedures to be constitutional under certain restrictions (Terry v. Ohio 1968).…

    • 761 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Today around 1,400 citizens in New York City will have their constitutional rights violated through an unlawful search. The legal term for the controversial search is stop and frisk. The New York Police Department continues to pressure its officers to stop and frisk citizens, and these situations are happening at an alarmingly increasing rate. For the New York Police Department, it seems to be a game of numbers as they continue to force their officers to conduct stop and frisks through quotas (Gangi). While New York City has seen a decrease in crime over Mayor Bloomberg's term, it is difficult to directly correlate the stop and frisk policy with these decreases. This unlawful practice needs to stop as it is a controversial practice that many people believe is a direct violation of the human rights inherent for citizens. Furthermore, it could turn New York City into a police state.…

    • 1108 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In an effort to maximize an individuals rights during search and seizures along with stop-and-frisks, the United States government has developed numerous laws and amendments. The Fourth Amendment states, The right of people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched , and the persons or things to be seized (U.S. Constitution). This amendment was first used in the court system in the case of Terry vs. Ohio (1968). This case was the case that shaped the stop-and-frisk laws that are found in our country today. In 1942 legislators started to authorize stops-and-frisks on less than probable cause under the Uniform Arrest Act. This act gave an officer the right stop a person in public based upon reasonable ground to suspect that the person is committing has committed, or is about to commit a crime, and then search him for a dangerous weapon if the officer has reasonable ground to believe that he is in danger (Whitebread, 2000). In 1968 the Supreme Court addressed the issue in terry v. ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 88 S. Ct. 1868, 20 L. Ed. 2d 889. In Terry an experienced plainclothes officer observed three men acting suspiciously; they were walking back and forth on a street and peering into a particular store window. The officer concluded that the men were preparing to rob a nearby store and approached them. He identified himself as a police officer and asked for their names. Unsatisfied with their responses, he then subjected one of the men to a frisk, which produced a gun for which the suspect…

    • 372 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Stop and Frisk for Law

    • 1231 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Ethnicity and Stop and Frisk laws have become a topic of concern because it questions the constitutional right of the fourth amendment. Police Officers are said to abuse power given their authority to stop and frisk a person under the “reasonable suspicion” clause of the fourth amendment. This research will argue that reasonable suspicion is subject to personal interpretation of police officers and perjury may be involved. With that being said minorities of Black and Hispanic backgrounds are the targeted population for this course of action.…

    • 1231 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Police Ride Along

    • 3444 Words
    • 14 Pages

    LAPD. (n.d.). Retrieved March1, 2010 from http://www.joinlapd.com/qualifications.html Walker, S, Katz, C. (2008). The police in america. (6th ed.). Retrieved March 1, 2010…

    • 3444 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Stop And Frisk Essay

    • 1570 Words
    • 7 Pages

    “Stop and Frisk” has been a very controversial method of policing over the last few years in New York city because of its associations with racial profiling. It has been used as a tool for the government to attempt to reduce crime in a preemptive way by using reasonable suspicion to stop, question, search, and if necessary, detain any citizen the officer chooses. Statistically, almost 90% of stop and frisk suspects in New York city were found to have nothing incriminating and were promptly released. It also had little to no impact on reducing crime and murder in the city of New York. However, it impacted the the rights citizens felt like they had because it instituted a form of social control at the hands of the government.…

    • 1570 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    There have been ongoing debates about the guidelines for police officers when conducting discretionary searches. One police department that has been in the headlines for its practices of discretionary searches have been the New York City’s Police Department. New York City’s Stop and frisk policy allowed police officers to stop and search an individual on the street at their discretion based on suspicion of criminal activity. One of the most highly publicized cases of NYPD’s stop and frisk tactic was the 2014 death of Eric Garner in the hands of Staten Island Police Department. The Eric Garner’s case followed outpours from citizens calling for change in NYPD’s stop and frisk guidelines and other police departments as well. This week’s article…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    If a police officer violates the rights or privacy of a citizen, it can have some grave consequences such as: loosing a case, fined, sued, setting a criminal free or legal action brought towards his/her self. So in order to prevent these consequences from occurring, officers should take the proper precautions and remember the guideline; that there must be sufficient or sensible reason to justify the intrusion of a search or seizure. The best way to ensure safety is to not conduct any searches without a warrant, signed by a neutral judge. Even though this is not very realistic or practical; however, the purpose of a warrant is to provide that protective layer between the exuberance of the officers and the privacy of the public. At the end of the day, the court is responsible for reviewing the actions of the police in their everyday life; this is when they balance the interest of law enforcement against the interest of personal liberty. Then they determine whether or not probable cause existed for the search or…

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Inchoate Crimes

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages

    There must always be probable cause for an officer to search you. The force of police officers is sometimes questioned during an arrest, which is where the fine line between police discretion and our rights differ. The “reasonableness” standard of police force is their judgment at the time of the arrest and the substantive due process prohibits our rights from being violated from the police or any federal agency. If law enforcement used the substantive approach to crime there would be no allowance for discretion and every person would have the same…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays