Preview

1 Do Youthink The Conduct Of

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
171 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
1 Do Youthink The Conduct Of
1, do you think the conduct of the officer is a "search" within the 4th Amendment requiring a warrant? Why or why not?
I think the officer violated the 4th Amendment and should have had a warrant for his actions to be legal. I think that the officer did not provide solid proof or evidence that led him to believe the suspect was a drug dealer he took illegal action to obtain information.
2, Assuming a warrant is required, what practical problems may officers face in similar cases based on what you have learned about proper procedure for executing search warrants?
I think that officers will face more problems when they lack probable cause. In this case the officer went on a hunch without seeing, having any witnesses or hearing of anything that could possibly lead to obtaining a warrant. This seems to be an ongoing issue for officers because they’re many people that can be read about that feel they have been a wrongfully abused or a subject of officer misconduct.
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Antonio Richard Rochin Case Summary
    • 346 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Antonio Richard Rochin Case Summary

    The action of the police officers were completely wrong, both legally and morally. The officers violated Antonio Richard Rochin’s 4th, 14th and 5th Amendment rights. The officers never obtained a warrant to enter and search Rochin’s residence; therefore, making any evidence discovered inadmissible in court. In addition they violated Rochin’s 4th Amendment rights, and no one should have their home broken into by those who’s jobs are supposed to protect us based on some hearsay evidence. It would be understandable if these officers had enough evidence to create probable cause to create enough reasonable suspicion to get a warrant before searching Rochin’s house. Instead the officers chose to take the law into their own hands by “jumping…

    • 346 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case Study: Chimel V. California
    • 211 Words
    • 1 Page

    Case Study: Chimel V. California

    Facts: This case raises questions concerning the Fourth Amendment and searches incident to a lawful arrest. On September 13th, 1965, three police officers arrived at Chimel’s residence in Santa Ana, California. They possessed a search warrant, which authorized Chimel’s…

    • 211 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Minnesota V. Timothy Dickerson Case Summary
    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Minnesota V. Timothy Dickerson Case Summary

    In Minnesota vs. Timothy Dickerson, two police officers parked in an unmarked car, outside of an apartment building known for trafficking contraband substances, did willfully and knowingly stop and frisk respondent due to suspicious and evasive behavior, exiting the twelve-unit apartment building. The officers felt that upon his exit and approach towards patrol car, and eye contact with one of the officers, he turned and proceeded into a side alley. Officers then pursued respondent feeling his suspicious and evasive behavior was probable of being criminal in nature. They pulled their car into the alley and immediately stopped and searched the defendants outer clothing finding no weapons. During the cursory search one officer testified that he had felt a cellophane bag containing crack cocaine later when weighed a total of 1/5th of a gram was found. The officers claimed it within their scope to search and seize what the officer suspected to be drugs inside the defendants clothing.…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Ken Krooks Case Study
    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Ken Krooks Case Study

    Each time a police officer chooses to make an arrest, they demonstrate whether or not they practice the proper discretion that their career field expects of them. For the particular case involving Ken Krook, a young man who had attempted to rob a liquor store, while holding the store clerk at gun point. While Ken fled the scene, a responding officer had been notified on behalf of the specific crime that had taken place following a veg description of the individual. After noticing an individual who seemed to fit the description of Ken Kook, the officer ran after the criminal, eventually making an arrest. This case brings up the issue involving what is and is not a proper use of discretion, and whether the arrest of Ken Krook was done lawfully.…

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Meta-Investigation on The Michael Brown Case
    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Meta-Investigation on The Michael Brown Case

    There are no actual charges yet for this case, because they are still investigating this case in Ferguson, Missouri. The officer had reasonable doubt to ask Michael Brown to get off the road and to get onto the sidewalk. He had the law on his side if he would have frisked the two young guys and possibly arrest one or both of them. The media and Al Sharpton and other Elites are trying to make this out to be a civil case. It almost seems as if Michael basically committed Copicide. The rule of discretion was followed, it seems. The officer followed through at his own discretion instead of calling for backup.…

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Radley Balko Case Study
    • 1136 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Radley Balko Case Study

    The Utah police shot a young man who had a golf club and thought his home was being burglarized. Although, the suspect could have been on drugs during the raid, the officers had the discretion to talk the gentleman down or to use force. In the video, it clearly shows that before the roommate could get out of the hallway, shots were fired. You can clearly see that the roommate did not have a gun, but that he had a golf club in his hand. In this case the police could have shot the man with a taser gun instead of a gun, or if they had fear of weapons used, they could have shot the man in a non fatal area. The second video shows the officer shooting someone who had a knife. The suspect was asked by police to put down his knife and within seconds the man was fatally shot. The officer could have given the man more time to drop his knife, no matter the area of where the man had the knife on him. Although the police camera did not record the visual aspect of the confrontation between the man and the officer, the officer decision cost a man of his life. In the recording the officer was asked by a woman who was near the scene why did he shoot the man. The officer responded and stated that he did not put the knife down as requested. The officer was cleared of any charges in this case. The officer could have given more time for the man to put the knife down or tased the man, or used pepper spray to ensure officer safety. The last video, although had no fatalities, showed that they officers were unethical in their decision making. The last video records officers joking and singing in a suspect’s musical equipment, after they enter the home believing drugs were sold out of the home. The homeowner did have personal use marijuana in the home not and enough to sell as mass distribution. After the officers realized that the musical equipment was expensive and exceptional the officers started…

    • 1136 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Dethorne Graham's Objective Reasonableness
    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Dethorne Graham's Objective Reasonableness

    If anything they did was called into question, they would ask “would a reasonable officer, in the exact same situation, respond the same way?” In the case of Graham v. Connor, the officers used more force than necessary in the situation. They were not listening to Graham when he was trying to explain that he was diabetic and needed some sugar. They instead cuffed him and threw him on the hood of the car. Throughout the process of his detention he sustained many different injuries. In this case the objective reasonableness for this situation, it is not there, the officers had no reason to use this much force when they were interacting with…

    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Pennsylvania Vs Mimms
    • 938 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Pennsylvania Vs Mimms

    When police have encounters with suspects there are legal justifications that are required during those encounters as well as determining the potential for criminal evidence. In this particular case study, officer Smith has noticed a vehicle that has what seems to be a broken tail light, therefore pulls over the vehicle. The fact that the car has a possible broken tail light is enough to pull the vehicle over, a simple whats called in most states a correctable violation, typically resulting in a ticket or a certain amount of days to get it fixed. Therefore I believe that officer Smith had a legitimate reason to pull the vehicle over, however I do not believe he had reasonable suspicion until he started to approach the car.…

    • 938 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    POL 303 Week 2 Discussion Questions 1 4th Amendment
    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages

    POL 303 Week 2 Discussion Questions 1 4th Amendment

    This work POL 303 Week 2 Discussion Questions 1 4th Amendment comprises solution of the following task: "What rights are protected by the 4th Amendment? Provide three concrete examples. Why are unreasonable searches forbidden? What factors determine whether a search is reasonable or not? Explain in 200…

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Eyewitness Identification: Supreme Court Case
    • 1638 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Eyewitness Identification: Supreme Court Case

    California, two men argued that their Fourth Amendment had been violated by the officers conducting the traffic stop. When the case was brought to the Supreme Court, the court determined that since their was an eyewitness account of reckless driving along with the smell of marijuana, the officers had enough reasonable suspicion to conduct a traffic stop and a vehicle search. Without the 911 callers description of the vehicle, someone else could have been pulled over or, if she had provided inaccurate information of the vehicle, the petitioners could have appealed to the court by stating that they were not the vehicle described, therefore were searched with no reasonable suspicion and should have the evidence thrown out of court. Since it appeared that the caller experienced no sort of impairment when describing the vehicle to the dispatcher, they were able to make an entirely legal traffic stop and vehicle search with no breach of the petitioner’s constitutional…

    • 1638 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    What Is The Difference Between The Fourth Amendment Pros And Cons
    • 1005 Words
    • 5 Pages

    What Is The Difference Between The Fourth Amendment Pros And Cons

    Sometimes I feel as though some officers take it for far and do things that they shouldn't. If someone knows what's wrong and right they would know better than to go out and do something dumb. I feel as though the stop and frisk is something can be helpful to people everywhere. If someone knows they aren't doing anything wrong or have any weapons on them then there should not be a problem. They should go along with the officer and do whatever is asked and there will not be a problem. It becomes a problem when people do not cooperate and want to start fighting back. Officers are just trying to do their job and protect everyone. Sometimes they can be wrong about who they stop but at least know that person knows what they were doing is suspicious and not good to do around. The case took long to process because it was hard trying to figure out if the officer had the right to seize the weapon. In order to search someone you have to have probable cause. The court then denied the motion to suppress and Terry and Chilton pleaded not guilty. The judge then determined that they were…

    • 1005 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Search Allowed If Police Hear Evidence Being Destroyed
    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Search Allowed If Police Hear Evidence Being Destroyed

    “The court today arms the police with a way routinely to dishonor the Fourth Amendment’s warrant requirement in drug cases,” Justice Ginsburg wrote. “In lieu of presenting their evidence to a neutral magistrate, police officers may now knock, listen, then break the door down, never mind that they had ample time to obtain a warrant.”…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Adderall - Essay
    • 1098 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Adderall - Essay

    * My personal opinion on this is that this cop, however the situation he might have found himself, had no right to tell that little boy that. He might have been just joking but after that little incident kids are going to be afraid of cops. Which is a growing issue since everyone puts a bad image on cops. For example a little kid does something wrong and his mother tells him I’m going to tell the cops to come and get you. They grow up thinking cops are bad when in reality they’re there to help us. How are those kids going to feel about cops now? These types of reckless people are the ones who affect the image of a good organization.…

    • 1098 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Research Paper On Stop And Frisk
    • 1662 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Research Paper On Stop And Frisk

    Ohio that legislation was put out to describe how stop and frisks can be done constitutionally. The case was about a Cleveland detective who approached, stopped, questioned, and frisked three men that he believed were acting suspicious. He found out that two of the men were carrying weapons and therefore arrested them. The defense tried to say that that the search and seizure was a violation of the Fourth Amendment because there was no probable cause. In the final ruling, “the Supreme Court ruled 8-1 that an officer can legally stop a person if the officer has reasonable suspicion that criminal activity is afoot.…

    • 1662 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Police Officer Violations
    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Police Officer Violations

    Police officer’s main responsibility is their roll to enforce the laws that exist to provide for public safety and the protection of our individual rights as citizens of the United States. In the 2007 State of New York v. Oliver, Isnora, and Cooper case, it was appropriate to prosecute the five police officers for assault, wrongful death, various civil rights violations, and negligence of duty. When the case first started, the police officers disregarded the fourth amendment which states that if a police officer has reasonable suspicion to believe that a crime may be afoot, he can briefly stop the suspicious person to make reasonable inquires aimed at dispelling or confirming the officers conjecture. The officer also needs a warrant that is…

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics