Tanglewood Case Study #2 Markov Analysis Table 1.1 Current Workforce 1 2 3 4 5 Exit 8500 = 4505 510 3485 1200 600 192 850 493 102 150 9 69 12 50 33 17 Gap Analysis 1 2 3 4 5 Exit Year End total 4505 1110 694 171 45 External Hires needed 3995 90 156 -21 5 Environmental Scan Tanglewood
Premium Demographics Management Demography
Tanglewood Case Study #1 Dear Donald Penchiala‚ I am external consultant for staffing services‚ and I would like to make some suggestions on staffing quantity and staffing quality strategies for Tanglewood. In my professional opinion‚ developing current talent would be a better and more cost effective strategy for Tanglewood than acquiring new talent. Going forward‚ new employees with minimal or no retail background should have a chance to develop retail experience as an associate while growing
Premium Management Employment Recruitment
Tanglewood Stores Case 3 1) Recruitment Guide for Store Associate Position: Store Associate Reports to: Department Manager/Store Manager Qualifications: College graduate or any individual who has retail and/or customer service experience Relevant labor market: The states of Washington and Oregon Timeline: No specific timeline‚ ongoing recruitment process Activities to undertake to source well-qualified candidates: Kiosks Referrals Staffing Agencies Staff Members Involved: Corporate
Premium Customer service Recruitment Employment agency
Tanglewood Case Study 7 Mgmt 364 Staffing Abby Gilpin Question 2: The top 3 candidates will be Max Renoir‚ Thomas Reznor and James Heckman based on using the Compensatory Model. When looking at these 3 candidates they are the strongest in the unit weight with 70‚ 73 and 76 respectively and rational weight with 67.5‚ 69 and 76 respectively. Reznor and Renior have done well on the testing‚ conscientiousness and extraversion. Heckman’s testing was not outstanding‚ but his scores for conscientiousness
Premium Weight Retailing
● TANGLEWOOD CASEBOOK for use with STAFFING ORGANIZATIONS ● ● 6th Ed. Kammeyer-Mueller | | TANGLEWOOD CASEBOOK To accompany Staffing Organizations‚ sixth edition‚ 2009. Prepared by John Kammeyer-Mueller Warrington College of Business University of Florida Gainesville‚ Florida Telephone: 352-392-0108 E-mail: kammeyjd@ufl.edu Copyright ©2009 Mendota House‚ Inc. Herbert G. Heneman III President Telephone: 608-233-4417 E-mail: hheneman@bus.wisc.edu |INTRODUCTION
Premium Retailing Department store Human resources
discrimination case Ms. Riyadh will have to establish a Prima Facie Case proving religious and gender or sex discrimination. The company (ABC) will have the burden of proof of proving their failure to promote Ms. Riyadh to a higher position is not related to her religion or her sex. Ms. Riyadh has to prove she was intentionally discriminated against due to said reasons. Ms. Riyadh’s Prima Facie will be based on both sex and religious discrimination. Her religious discrimination case is based on the
Premium Employment Discrimination Sexual harassment
Introduction 1 Documentation 2 Administrator Role in WebHR 3 Appointment of a WebHR Administrator 3 Responsibilities of a WebHR Administrator 4 Recommendation from WebHR 4 User Assignments in WebHR 5 WebHR Customer Edition 6 WebHR Automated HR Edition 6 Administrator Menus in the HR Edition 7 PAID Menu 9 System Menu for HRIS Staff only 13 Users>Roles Option for WebHR Administrators only 14 Troubleshooting 17 Update User Profile 17 Cannot Access the Application 17 Cannot
Premium Human resources Human resource management
Recruitment guide for customer service representative: Position: Customer service representative Reports to: Department Manager Qualifications: Ability to read and write. Some customer service experience desired but not required. Timeline: open Ability to undertake to source qualified candidates: Regional newspaper‚ media advertising Post job opening on company website Request employee referral Contact state job services Contact‚ if necessary‚ staffing agencies to source candidates Staff
Premium Employment Recruitment Employment agency
Memo:_________________________________________________________________ To: Marilyn Gonzalez and Daryl Perrone From: Date: October 16‚ 2014 Subject: Tanglewood Case 4: Measurement and Validation ____________________________________________________________________________ We have conducted an analysis of the new selection methods used in our processes for Store Associate. We have included 10 Seattle-based stores‚ and an adequate sample size of employees both in the pilot locations
Premium Statistical hypothesis testing Statistical significance Statistics
1. Describe the internal labor market of the company in terms of job stability (staying in the same job)‚ promotion paths and rates‚ transfer paths and rates‚ demotion paths and rates‚ and turnover (exit) rates. ANSWER: Sales Department (Full-time) 50% of the sales department stayed the same it was no changes 10% of the full-time transferred to a part-time position 5% of the full-time was promoted to an Assistant Sales Manager 0% of the full-time was promoted to Regional
Premium Part-time Full-time Stay