• Cole.G.A. Management Theory and Practice. 6th edithion. • Griffin Ricky W. Management. 8th edition. Houghton Mifflin Company • Hellriegel Don & Slocum John W. Management: Contingency Approaches. 2nd edition. Addison Wesley Publishing Company • Mullins Laurie J. Management and Organizational Behavior. 7th edition. Prentice Hall: India • Robbins Stephen P. (1999). Organizational Behavior. 8th edition. Prentice Hall: India. • Robbins Stephen P & Coulter Mary. (1998). Management. 5th edition
Premium Organizational structure Management Organization
MARKS: 80 ( Each case study for 20 Marks) Subject – Principles and Practice of Management Commu`nicating in a Crisis Overview Valley High School‚ situated in Kodaikanal‚ was established in 1980 and is owned by a well respected charitable trust. It overlooks a lake and is a modern building equipped with state-of-the-art facilities. The total student enrolment is 2000‚ out of which more than 50% are girls and the rest boys. The students are all from affluent‚ educated families. The school
Premium Nonverbal communication Minority group Focus group
Culture and Society ANTHRO 9 Lectures: Tuesdays and Thursdays 9:30-10:45 A.M. Room: Haines 39 (in basement-A level) Final Exam date: March 18 (Tuesday): 3-6P.M. Instructor Prof. Mariko Tamanoi Email: mtamanoi@anthro.ucla.edu Office: Haines 325 Phone: 310-206-8399 Office hours: Tuesdays 11:30 A.M. – 1:30 P.M. FIRST and MOST IMPORTANT: READ THIS SYLLABUS CAREFULLY TO THE END! Section Leaders Bradley Cardozo: bcardozo@ucla.edu Camille Frazier: c.frazier@ucla.edu Emily
Premium Anthropology Culture Kinship
1 MANAGEMENT PRINCIPLE‚ MANAGEMENT THEORY‚ AND MANAGEMENT PRACTICES MGMT310 American Military University Monique Outerbridge 2 Every organization utilizes different types of management techniques‚ practices‚ theories and principles. Each organization utilizes their own practices as it correlates to their organizations’ mission‚ goals and culture. What works for one organization may not work for the next. In my opinion‚ I believe that multiple management practices can work for an organization
Premium Management
negatives regarding the concept of cultural relativism‚ but his overall position is that cultural relativism is not a strong philosophy. On the flip side of that Immanuel Kant has a completely different ethical theory that is based around deontology. Despite its positives cultural relativism cannot be defended against Rachel’s criticism‚ but Kant’s ethical theory cannot necessarily defeat cultural relativism. Cultural Relativism is the idea that moral practices and social norms change from culture to
Premium Morality Ethics Immanuel Kant
Case 1: Introduction of the Case: Abstract: Carrefour was the second largest retailer of consumer goods and groceries worldwide‚after Wal-mart. The company pioneered the concept of hypermarket in their homecountry‚ France‚ as early as 1960’s.However‚ towards late 1990’s; Carrefour saw a de-cline in their French hypermarkets owing to certain unfavorable government regula-tions and competition from hard discount stores. Carrefour introduced a series of strategic initiatives in an effort to revamp
Premium Carrefour Wal-Mart Business process reengineering
Ethical Relativism is the belief that nothing is objectively right or wrong and that the meaning of what is right and wrong depends on the individual and culture. Pojman breaks down Ethical Relativism into 2 main concepts: The Diversity Theory and the Dependency Theory. The Diversity Theory addresses the concept of what is morally right and wrong varies from society to society; therefore‚ there is no universal moral principles that all societies accept. For example‚ Homosexuality in the Middle East
Premium Morality Cultural relativism Ethics
relatively small. It can be used literally (an observed series of actual collisions) or metaphorically (causal linkages within systems such as global finance or politics). Theory X In the theory X‚ management assumes employees are inherently lazy and will avoid work if they can. As a result‚ management believes that workers need to be closely supervised and comprehensive systems of controls to develop. A hierarchical structure is needed with narrow span of control at each and every level. According
Premium Management
Ethical Relativism Cannibalism‚ what do you think of it? Is it morally correct? Does the theory of ethical relativism support it or does it knock it down? Throughout this paper I am going to evaluate the pros and cons of ethical relativism for a case concerning cannibalism. An American man by the name of Daniel went to South America‚ for the reasons of writing a book on it and publishing it in the United States‚ to study a native tribe and to try to become part of it. While Daniel was studying
Premium Relativism Morality Cultural relativism
Concept of ethical relativism Ethical relativism is the theory that there are no universalized moral standards to apply to all people all the time. The relativity of ethics refers to the ethics may be different in different societies. The same situation and behavior may be morally acceptable in one society but morally unacceptable in another. However‚ this theory is rejected by most ethicists. First of all‚ some claim that while the moral practices of societies may differ‚ the fundamental moral
Premium Morality Ethics