Generally speaking‚ an antagonist is a character in a literary work that opposes the protagonist‚ or chief character. The antagonist can be a person‚ animal‚ or force of nature‚ as long as it provides a source of conflict. Juror Eight could at first be viewed as the antagonist of Twelve Angry Men‚ because he opposes the votes of the other eleven jurors. However‚ as the story progresses‚ Juror Eight establishes reasonable doubt and is able to convince and win over more and more jurors. Eventually
Premium Jury Not proven Law
A psychological phenomenon where people tend to strive for consensus within a group while assuming their decisions cannot be wrong. Individual who may have opposing beliefs often remain quiet and adopt to the groups opinion for the sake of conformity. (Cherry) Applications: 1. One setting in which groupthink occurs in the movie 12 Angry Men. The movie is about a jury who must reach a verdict of guilty or not guilty on a murder case. 11 out of the 12 jurors vote “guilty”‚ while one votes “not guilty
Premium Jury Not proven Verdict
Part I 1. Foreman Assertive 2. Bank Teller Non –Assertive 3. Massage service owner Aggressive‚ Assertive 4. Stock Broker Aggressive‚ Argumentive 5. Man from Slums Aggressive‚ Authoritarian 6. Painter Argumentive 7. Baseball Fan Aggressive 8. Architect Argumentive 9. Feeble Old Man Non -Assertive 10. Garage Owner Aggressive 11. Watchmaker Non-Assertive‚ Argumentive 12. Adman Non -Assertive Part II A. Who was the leader of the
Premium Jury Aggression Not proven
The scene starts off in a New York City Court of law jury room. There’s an empty jury room and a judge is giving a set of final instructions to the Jurors. We learn that this is a murder case and that if found guilty‚ he would be sentenced to death penalty. After these instructions‚ the Jurors enter. All the Jurors presume the obvious guilt of the defendant‚ whom we learn has been accused of killing his father. Eventually‚ the twelve sit down and a vote is taken. All of the Jurors vote “guilty”
Free Jury Not proven Court
Defence Closing Statement Members of the Jury‚ you have now heard all of the evidence in this case which I would like to take this opportunity to remind you of. My client ‚ Mr Chris Howells‚ is accused of ASSAULT OCCASIONING ACTUAL BODILY HARM contrary to section 47 of the Offences Against the Person Act 1861. The first witness you heard from today was one of two doorpersons at the Xplode night club‚ Billie Evans‚ who was present on the night of the 10th February 2012. This witness admitted to
Premium Jury Critical thinking Assault
The movie 12 Angry Men was released in 1957. Its opening scene is in a courtroom where the judge is giving directions to the jury. An 18 year old boy has been accused of murdering his father with a knife. The death sentence is mandatory if the boy is convicted and the verdict must be unanimous‚ either guilty or not guilty. The remainder of the movie is set in a hot‚ stuffy jury room. An initial vote is taken and the count is 11 guilty and 1 not guilty. As the vote is taken it is clear that some jurors
Premium 12 Angry Men Jury Not proven
J.F. Clark once said‚ “The bravest of individuals is the one who obeys his or her conscience”. In other ways‚ it takes courage to do what your mind tells you rather than you forcing yourself. This statement is accepted because your mind tells you what is right or wrong‚ and sometimes there’s consequence with the situation. In the play‚ 12 Angry Men by Reginald Rose‚ and the novel‚ To Kill a Mockingbird by Harper Lee‚ the characters face what they truly believe through the characters in the play and
Premium Jury Not proven To Kill a Mockingbird
Democracy and the right to serve as a juror are a great privilege and responsibility which is not to be taken lightly‚ as see n in Twelve Angry Men. How does Rose use the play to reflect these themes? In Reginald Rose Twelve Angry Men‚ Rose uses the play to reflect the duty and responsibility of a juror. Rose uses the characters to reflect different themes of the play. As a democratic country‚ jurors have a great privilege and responsibility and it shouldn’t be taken lightly as some juror’s
Free Jury Not proven
Comparison essay comparing Juror 3 and Juror 8 What are some similarities between Jurors 3 and 8? What about differences? Oh gosh‚ it’s been years since I’ve seen the movie (didn’t read the play). Okay‚ Juror #3 is the angry father‚ and Juror #8 is the guy who stands alone in the INNOCENT vote‚ right? I suspect the similarities are easier to find by reading the play because the movie really shows their contrasts. There is one similarity in that when they really believe something‚ they
Premium Jury Not proven Verdict
Quotes Quote #1 page 72: “3rd Juror: … that goddamn rotten kid. I know him. What they’re like. What they do to you. How they kill you every day. My god‚ don’t you see? How come I’m the only one who sees? Jeez‚ I can feel that knife goin’ in. 8th Juror: it’s not your boy. He’s somebody else. 4th Juror: let him live. [There’s a long pause.] 3rd Juror: All right. Not guilty” This is memorable to me because when the 3rd juror was talking I realized that his anger was coming from problems at
Premium Jury Boy Not proven