FIRST DIVISION [G.R. No. 118101. September 16‚ 1996] EDDIE DOMASIG‚ petitioner‚ vs. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION (SECOND DIVISION)‚ CATA GARMENTS CORPORATION and/or OTTO ONG and CATALINA CO‚ respondents. D E C I S I O N PADILLA‚ J.: This petition for certiorari under Rule 65 of the Rules of Court seeks to nullify and set aside the Resolution[1] of respondent National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC) rendered on 20 September 1994 remanding the records of the case to the arbitration branch
Premium Legal burden of proof Legal terms Evidence
PEOPLE VS. REBUTADO FACTS: Jesus Rebutado (Jesus) is brother to Edwin Rebutado (Edwin; a retardate) who one night brought home a pack of cigarettes. The said pack exploded during the family’s dinner. It was alleged that Emmanuel Caon Jr. (Junior) was the perpetrator of the incident. It was however found otherwise by the barangay after their investigation. Unsatisfied‚ Jesus still wants to confront Junior; hence‚ one day Jesus violently followed Emmanuel Rebutado Sr. (Senior) home. Upon
Premium Trial court Appeal Jury
upset at a number of things such as‚ conflicts between him and his father‚ his sexuality‚ his peers not liking him‚ or him being caught drinking alter wine. Donald never stated why he was upset upon returning meeting with Father Flynn so there is no proof that Father Flynn was the cause. Sister James points out that Sister Aloysius isn’t very fond of Father Flynn because of some of his characteristics. This
Premium Evidence Scientific evidence Critical thinking
doubt.” According to our text‚ “one of the most deeply rooted traditions of modern Anglo-Saxon law is that an accused is innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt (Gardner & Anderson‚ 2013).” Beyond a Reasonable Doubt is a standard of proof that is used in criminal cases‚ and a person cannot be convicted of a crime unless a judge or jury is convinced of the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. If there is any doubt based on the evidence heard‚ a defendant cannot be convicted
Premium Law Legal burden of proof Jury
Material Acquiring Admissible Statements Worksheet Conduct an Internet search by visiting the state websites for Arizona‚ Illinois‚ New York‚ and California. Locate the legal requirements to obtain admissible statements in these states. Include your research findings in the following table. |State |Legal requirements |Precedent |Other | |Arizona |Confessions are admissible in evidence
Premium Evidence law Law Jury
Disparate treatment means unequal behavior toward someone because of a protected characteristic‚ and it is protected under Title VII of the U.S. Civil Rights Act. A disparate treatment violation occurs when an individual of a protected group is shown to have been singled out and treated less favorably than others in a similar situation on the basis of a characteristic that is protected under Title VII. For a disparate treatment claim to be upheld in court it must be plausible and shows that the employer
Premium Evidence Racism Discrimination
Step 4 : Management has followed progressive discipline Manager Marlboro Yes- Employer is already gave written warning and suspension to prior violation. As adopted progressive discipline‚ the next step can be predicted even with the case that not harm company license. However‚ in this case one of two rules that employee are suspected in can cost company to lose license‚ reputation and money in case of fire or explosion happen. Obviously‚ the penalty for this one should be heavier than written
Premium Evidence Critical thinking Scientific evidence
irony because when you need a philanthropist there is no one to help them then she suddenly appears. An example from the text is‚ “well them‚ come with me. I have two of the best tickets and we’ll watch the game together “ (P.131) . This evidence is proof of a hypocritical widow. On one hand she gives-but with another limb she kills. Obviously the widow is pretending to feel distraught for her husband’s death; Irony Cally ‚ she feels vengeful rather than san. This proves she feels accomplished
Premium Evidence Fiction Satire
include the legal representation involved in a case and the availability of legal aid‚ the capacity of the jury assessing the trial‚ the credibility of scientific evidence and the impact of social media on the trial process. Due to such flaws the criminal trial process is not always an effective means of achieving justice. There is often unfair advantages in the trial process as not all members of society have the same access to legal representatives or availability of legal aid. Legal aid is a great
Premium Law Jury Criminal law
If Frederick were to ask me for my advice concerning this scenario‚ I would advise him not to file suit. This was admittedly a difficult decision for me. The basis for this decision is 1Corinthians 6:7‚ which states‚ “Therefore‚ to have legal disputes against one another is already a moral failure for you. Why not rather put up with injustice? Why not rather be cheated (HCSB)?” H. Wayne House says it best when he states‚ “This is a difficult saying‚ but there are many difficult sayings in the
Premium Forgiveness Law Pleading