Criminal Conduct and Criminal Law Jessica Dorsey LEG 320 July 25‚ 2014 Strayer University CRIMINAL CONDUCT AND CRIMINAL LAW Actus rea and mens rea are both important elements to convicting anyone for any crime. The actual commitment of a criminal act is actus rea. The guilty or criminal mind state is mens rea. Despite the fact that both actus rea and mens rea do not have to exist a conviction is still very feasible. When a criminal act is committed and the individual
Premium Criminal law Crime Criminology
Criminal Law Paper Stephanie Watts CJA3405 10/12/2015 Criminal Law Paper Criminal Law serves many purposes and aides in maintaining today’s society and norms as we know it. According to sociologist Max Weber‚ the purpose of criminal law is to regulate human interaction (Criminal Law Today). According to text‚ criminal law protects society from harm‚ assuage victims of crime‚ punish and rehabilitate offenders‚ preserve and maintains social order‚ deters criminal activity‚ distinguishes the
Premium Criminal law
.............................. History of South African criminal law .............................................................................................. The sources of our criminal law ........................................................................................................ The onus of proof in criminal cases .................................................................................................. Criminal liability: a summary ..................................
Premium Criminal law Crime Criminology
Criminal Law notes 1.Voluntary act: Status offences – no conduct is required but the crime is committed when a certain state of affair exists or the defendant is in a certain condition or is of a particular status. R v Larsonneur (1933) – Appellant was brought involuntarily back to the UK where she was charged on being an ‘alien’. LCJ Hewart claimed the ‘circumstances are perfectly immaterial’ Winzar v Chief constable of Kent (1983) – drunk on a public highway. LJ Robert Goff claimed ‘it is enough
Premium Criminal law
To what extent is the criminal law in England and Wales clear as to when intoxication can be a defence? Should it be clearer? Introduction For hundreds of years‚ it has been assumed that individuals behave more aggressively while under the influence of alcohol. Alcohol related crimes cost the UK taxpayer £1.8 billion on average per year . However‚ society has taken an ambivalent attitude towards intoxication. Alcohol consumption is generally depicted as a puritanical
Premium Criminal law Crime Common law
with the intuition that appropriation must entail some subjective element and cannot be purely objective. With the aim of moving from the protection of possession to the protection of property‚ theTheft Act 1968 replaced the LarcenyAct 1916 actus reus requirement of ’taking and carrying away’ in the offence of theft with the requirement of ’appropriation’ defined as ’the assumption of the rights of the owner’. This change‚ however‚ has caused more problems than it solved‚ as courts have failed
Premium Criminal law Theft
Case Brief: Miller v. Alabama (2012) CJA/354 April 29‚ 2013 Case Brief: Miller v. Alabama (2012) The case of Miller v. Alabama (2012) is the result of Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals case No. 10-9646‚ which involves a 14-year-old named Evan Miller who was convicted of aggravated murder‚ and sentenced by the Alabama state court to a mandatory term of life in prison without parole. Miller and a friend assaulted Miller ’s neighbor‚ and set fire to his home after spending the evening
Free Criminal law Law Common law
explanation of corporate liability. Elements of Crime When proving that the defendant is guilty‚ there are two elements of law which are Actus Rea and Mens Rea. Actus Rea (a/r) Actus Rea is the physical element of a crime which is basically what the defendant has done and not done. Actus Rea can be: Voluntary act A failure to act A state of affairs An act (Voluntary Act) The act must be voluntary part of the defendant. For the defendant to execute
Free Criminal law
Top of Form Bottom of Form THE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY‚ JAMAICA THE FACULTY OF LAW CRIMINAL LAW I CAUSATION ______________________________________________________________ INTRODUCTION Where the actus reus of a crime includes specific consequences e.g. the crime of Murder - the consequence being death‚ it must be shown that the Defendant caused the victim’s death (although the defendant’s act need not be the sole or the main cause of death). A common approach of the courts has been to
Premium Causality Criminal law Causation
Actus Reus AR = the conduct element. Prescribes what needs to be done‚ in what circumstance and with what result (but not necessarily all three). Result: V is killed (note that we don’t really criminalise results in themselves‚ but rather the causation of results). Conduct: in rape: penetration. Circumstance: property belongs to another. All crimes have an AR. It is possible to have missing MR elements but this is not so for AR. Omissions Stephen LJ: “It is not a crime to cause death or injury
Premium Tort law Causality Actus reus