Weak e-pedia Despite the online encyclopedia Wikipedia ’s global popularity and massive amount of data covering vast ranges of topics across multiple languages‚ the validity of the content is questionable. It is a wise decision for universities and other educational institutions to prohibit students from using Wikipedia for reference material. The well known online knowledge bank has close to 4.5 million articles in English alone. With such massive content‚ it ’s probably safe to assume
Premium Wikipedia Internet World Wide Web
Wikipedia is a collaborative resource‚ which aims to be a compendium of all human knowledge. In a serious examination of Wikipedia as a credible and valid source of information we need to place our argument within a definable framework. As I will show information has many uses‚ for the purposes of this paper I will examine the use of Wikipedia for scholarly research‚ the kind‚ which I will be utilizing throughout the rest of my MBA program. I will be evaluating Wikipedia based on the parameters
Premium Primary source Wikipedia Source
Launched on 15 January 2001‚ Wikipedia is a free encyclopedia that uses the web platform for online users to access. Boasting with over 26 million pieces of writing in 285 languages‚ Wikipedia has transformed to be a giant in the field of search engines optimization technology. The open source concept that it rides have made it cheap to access and a better choice for many online users. This is especially among the users who find it cumbersome to follow prolonged registration processes to access information
Premium Editing Peer review Wikipedia
Wikipedia: Free Citations to the Free Encyclopedia In 2006‚ a study found that about eighty-seven percent of Wikipedia’s articles did not contain errors (Maehre). Wikipedia has been criticized by many who believe that its editorial process creates a source of information that is erroneous‚ uneven in quality‚ and subject to acts of deliberate attempts to lower the accuracy of information (Belanger). The website ’s millions of registered users‚ supporters‚ and administrators argue that they can edit
Premium Wikipedia Source Internet
Is Wikipedia an Acceptable Source for Academic Writing? Wikipedia is the ultimate source for information. It has articles on nearly every topic and has millions of editors around the world. However‚ just because it has a lot of information doesn’t mean that it is all good information. Academic writing is a very accurate type of writing that can require many unbiased‚ reliable‚ credible‚ and relevant sources. I do not think all Wikipedia articles are held to these standards and so‚ I do not believe
Premium Wikipedia Internet Website
The signals are clear: Google started sending less traffic to Wikipedia than it had a few months ago. While Wikipedia’s representatives aren’t very concerned about this phenomenon‚ the top affiliate networks are not too relaxed about what’s happening. In the last six months‚ the organic traffic from Google to Wikipedia had declined a massive 40%! Because the difference was hard to ignore‚ there were plenty of SEO experts who thought that the site had been hit by a Panda penalty (Read more about how
Premium World Wide Web Google Web search engine
Wikipedia is a free online encyclopedia available to everyone. If a person needs information on a subject they no longer need an entire set of encyclopedias in their home. They can simply use Wikipedia on their computers or other devices that have access to the internet. With tools like Wikipedia any information we need is at our fingertips. Much of it available in multiple languages. There are many branches of Wikipedia. Just to name a few‚ there is Wikibooks‚ Wikiquotes‚ and Wikinews.
Premium
Global warming is the increase in the average measured temperature of the Earth’s near-surface air and oceans since the mid-20th century‚ and its projected continuation. Global surface temperature increased 0.74 ± 0.18 °C (1.33 ± 0.32 °F) during the 100 years ending in 2005.[1][2] The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) concludes "most of the observed increase in globally averaged temperatures since the mid-twentieth century is very likely due to the observed increase in anthropogenic
Premium Global warming Climate change Greenhouse gas
Writing for Wikipedia could be a problem for female contributors. The fact is that the majority of contributors on the site are male. A small group of the male contributors hunt for the female contributor’s voice and quickly take aim and fire off at their writing style. Surprisingly‚ this gender bias actually exist on the site. However‚ don’t blame Wikipedia. They encourage all writers to join their community. The site definitely needs more female writers and their slant on topics. Here is some timely
Premium Gender Woman Female
Embrace Wikipedia In Mark Wilson’s article “Professors Should Embrace Wikipedia”‚ Wilson argues that despite the legitimacy of Wikipedia‚ educators should engage and take part in helping shape the direction of Wikipedia. In a test published in the journal “Nature”‚ articles in Wikipedia are said to be as revered as those in the “Encyclopedia Britannica.” Since the perceived lack of academic authority‚ Wilson suggests that those with research specialties should enroll as editors of Wikipedia to add
Premium Wikipedia Editing