2. Differences between leadership and management 2.1 Managers maintain things and leaders change things Studies on the subjects of leadership and management have the underlying difference between a leader and a manager as “managers maintain things and leaders change things.” Gill (2006:26) explains their difference as “Managers plan‚ allocate resources‚ administer and control whereas leaders innovate‚ communicate and motivate” Weathersby (Management Review Vol 88:3) summarises the contrast between
Premium Management Leadership
Leadership and Management Leaders and managers can both be found in successful organizations; however‚ leadership and management are two concepts that tend to be used in the same context‚ yet they do not mean the same thing. The two terms actually have a significant difference. Leadership is the ability to influences others to voluntarily pursue organizational goals‚ whereas management is exercising direction of a group/organization through executive administrative and supervisory positions. In some
Premium Management Leadership Fiedler contingency model
Transactional leadership involves a social exchange. It "focuses on interpersonal interactions between managers and employees" (Kreitner & Kinicki‚ 2005 p. 613). In transactional leadership "Leaders are seen as engaging in behaviors that maintain a quality interaction between themselves and followers" (Kreitner & Kinicki‚ 2005 p. 613). The two characteristics of Transactional leadership are: "Leaders use contingent rewards to motivate employees‚ and leaders exert corrective action only when subordinates
Premium Leadership Management Sociology
Transactional leadership is more of a management style than a form of leadership. Nevertheless‚ it can be very effective for motivating subordinates and eliciting productivity. There are a few assumptions that go hand-in-hand with transactional leadership. Primarily‚ transactional leadership assumes that people are motivated by rewards‚ they will cede authority to their chosen leaders and fulfill goals and objectives set by their leaders. There are many benefits that come with an organization’s choice
Premium Management Leadership Social influence
that ethics and leadership style are correlated? The leaders come from various industries for instance‚ publicly‚ private‚ government‚ and non-profit/for-profit. The leader’s ethical values influence leadership style. The research suggests that the transformational leadership style is established on deontological ethics whereas transactional leadership is based on teleological ethics. Key Arguments Leader values and transformational/ transactional leadership suggest that a divergent set of ethical
Premium Management Leadership Sociology
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP‚ INTEGRITY AND AN ETHICAL CLIMATE IN ORGANISATIONS Authors: Anja S. van Aswegen1 Amos S. Engelbrecht1 Affi liations: 1 Department of Industrial Psychology‚ Stellenbosch University‚ South Africa Correspondence to: Amos Engelbrecht e-mail: ase@sun.ac.za Postal address: PO Box 3543‚ Stellenbosch‚ 7602‚ South Africa How to cite this article: Van Aswegen‚ A.S.‚ & Engelbrecht‚ A.S. (2009). The relationship between transformational leadership
Free Ethics Leadership
...........................................................................................02 Introduction .............................................................................................................................02 Why Transformational Leadership Is Important?....................................................................03 Individual Growth and Development...........................................................................03 Increases Performance......
Premium Management Leadership Organizational studies and human resource management
(Aarons‚ 2006‚ p. 1163). It is evident that there is a connection between leadership‚ and organizational process (Aarons‚ 2006‚ p. 1163). It is evident that there is a difference between transformational and transactional leadership. The two forms of leaderships are seen to have a diverse relation to cultural and organizational boundaries studied in a number of research cases (Aarons‚ 2006‚ p. 1163). There are cases where leaders use both forms of leadership to enhance the output of their commitment
Premium Leadership
Abstract This paper presents a relationship between transformational leadership and organizational performance. Through some findings‚ it has been concluded that transformational leadership has positive relationship with the overall performance of organization which could be measured in terms of effectiveness‚ efficiency‚ relevance and profitability of the organization. There are‚ basically‚ four components of a transformational leadership: idealized influence‚ inspirational motivation‚ intellectual
Premium Leadership
Both transformational leadership and leader-member exchange leadership theories have been an issue of discussion for many scholars. The majority of authors agree that transformational leaders ‘have qualitatively different and quantitatively greater effects on their followers than the effects of exchange leaders’ (Gupta & Krishnan 2004‚ p.7). This essay builds on the existing literature about these two theories and will try to draw a parallel between LMX and transformational leadership‚ i.e. it will
Premium Leadership