theory of justice has its own process and objective. As a result‚ the outcomes of crime differ. The purpose of this paper seeks to examine a crime through the lens of four theories of justice: retributive‚ utilitarian‚ restorative‚ and parallel. Moreover‚ the paper will elaborate more on each theory of justice‚ including the theory’s procedural and distributive justice‚ through its hypothetical application of a criminal case in Fairfax County‚ Virginia. These various theories of justice arose from
Premium
Aristotelian Ethics & Distributive Justice Concern with material equality as the central form of distributive justice is a very modern idea. Distributive justice for Aristotle and many other writers for millennia after him was a matter of distributing what each ought to get from merit or desert in some sense. The idea of equality was arguably anathema to Aristotle and most other theorists‚ including Catholic philosophers‚ until modern times‚ indeed until the nineteenth century. A common view was
Premium Justice Utilitarianism Magistrate
Distributive justice concerns the proper and equal distribution of goods and attention‚ mostly from a monetary basis such as taxes‚ compensation and re-imbursement. This distribution is most often based on the needs and merits of individuals and organizations. The difficulty lies in deciding how and to whom allocations are dispersed as well as fairness of disbursement of funds based on individual and organizational entitlements. It mainly deals with what is fair monetary compensation for labor
Premium Political philosophy Justice Law
In an organization there has to be some type of justice. Which is organization justice‚ within this area there are three types of mechanisms‚ distributive‚ procedural‚ and interactional justice. Distributive justice is the equality of how people are treated in terms of reward or what is received from resources. Procedural justice is what is used to allot decisions through impartiality. Interactional justice is the quality of treatment received through methods that are employed. (Kreitner‚ & Kinicki
Premium Law Political philosophy Justice
Justice is a concept that can be broken down into a series of smaller beliefs or ideas. In many societies‚ justice is a system in which the people of a community or group are treated according to their actions and behavior. In societies such as this‚ people typically have roles that are delegated or earn where the people who disobey or do not follow the laws or regulations are punish. The idea of what kind of justice a person is entitled to is called distributive justice. This type of justice attempts
Premium Law Political philosophy Justice
PAPER ON THE TOPIC THE PHILOSOPHY OF DISTRUBUTIVE JUSTICE AND ITS RELEVANCE UNDER INDIAN CONSTITUTION The jurisprudence of distributive justice‚ according to juristic cynics‚ is an essay in illusion. The basic social system is built on gross inequalities and the power to lobby and mould State policy‚ even judicial policy‚ is heavily in the hands of the proprietariat. Being social realists and meliorists we have to work with the materials that we have and try to read the constitutional provisions
Premium Justice Sociology John Rawls
Hayek and Rawls take different paths along their journey to reach what they believe the proper form of distributive justice would be. They both follow liberal ideology‚ focusing more on the individual. Hayek follows a line of thinking based on liberty‚ utility‚ and a “economic order based on the market‚” and with that with that economic order comes capitalism as the most viable option for the society (Hayek‚ LLL p.68). Hayek believes that this society will offer the best opportunities for access
Premium John Rawls Liberalism Political philosophy
feel we belong we are ostracised and alienated. Our lives become devoted to finding a place where we feel accepted‚ if we ever truly do. Two related texts exploring this particular element of belonging include the picture book‚ Refugees by David Miller and
Premium Psychology Sociology Person
“Justice in Immigration” Immigration is not a human right‚ it is not a solution for a problem either‚ and immigrants who are denied admission into another country cannot claim it is violating their human rights because there are other options rather than emigrating. The article “Justice in Immigration” written by David Miller explains that nations have the ability to decide if they want to help immigrants and if they choose not to‚ it is not a violation of human rights. The article argues that refugees
Premium Immigration Human rights Immigration to the United States
1 NEGOTIATION SKILLS S2‚ 2012 WEEK 2: DISTRIBUTIVE BARGAINING 2 Today’s lecture: Distributive bargaining • • • • • The basic negotiation strategies Distributive bargaining scenarios Fundamentals of distributive bargaining Tasks to focus on Distributive tactics • Results from conflict management styles survey 3 Choosing a negotiation strategy • Distributive • Conflicting goals‚ fixed pie (“zerosum game”)‚ task is to claim value and maximize personal gains • Shared goals
Premium Negotiation Dispute resolution Bargaining