[pic] Controlled Start Up Project Brief Template & Notes Controlled Start Up: Project Brief The Project Brief The Project Brief is required to enable a project to progress from a good idea or Feasibility Study to a formal request to the Project Board. The contents of the Project Brief will eventually be expanded into a Project Initiation Document (PID)‚ which contains the detailed project plan. However‚ this will only occur if the Project Board believes that
Premium Project management
Emily Head CRJU 314 Koppersmith v. Alabama 742 So. 2d 206 (Ala. 1999) Concurrences: Judge Long‚ Judge McMillan‚ and Judge Fry Dissents: N/A Facts: Koppersmith and his wife Cindy were fighting in their front yard when Cindy tried to go inside. As she tried to enter the house Koppersmith stopped her and a physical dispute ensued. Cindy fell off the porch and into the yard. She died from a skull fractures to the back of her head. In Koppersmith’s statement he told police that him and Cindy
Premium Jury Appeal Court
Case Name: Maryland v. King (October 2012) Facts: Maryland police arrested a man named Alonzo Jay King‚ in 2009 for first and second degree assault charges and booked into the Wicomico County‚ Maryland‚ facility‚ where booking personnel took a cheek swab (“buccal swab”) to take a DNA sample pursuant to the Maryland DNA collection Act. The swab was matched up to an unsolved 2003 rape case. The police had collected the 2003 DNA sample from the rape victim who underwent a sexual assault forensic exam
Premium Supreme Court of the United States Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution Crime
CREATIVE BREIF Client: Hong Kong Council On Smoking and Health (COSH) Contact: 2838 8822 enq@cosh.org.hk Product/ Service: Quit Smoking- “One in two smokers will die early” Creative: TV Commercial Date: 2012.11.06 (YY/MM/DD) Background (History): The total smoking ban was started on 1 July 2009 which was implementing all indoor areas and some outdoor areas to be smoke-free. But the people are continuous smoking and lead the harmful secondhand smoke which affects others as well. In order
Premium Smoking Smoking cessation
The Private Movie Co.‚ Inc. v. Pamela Lee Anderson et al. 1. What are the facts? The Private Movie Company (Efraim) sued Pamela Lee Anderson for $4.6 million for walking away from oral and written contracts. The defendant (Anderson) claims to have agreed to the contracts on the stipulation that the script would be revised concerning nudity and simulated sex scenes‚ and upon reading the final script and seeing simulated sex scenes still included‚ walked out. 2. What is the legal issue? The
Premium Contract Void Gentlemen's agreement
Allen v. Dalk CITATION: Supreme Court of Florida No. SC01-2 (2002) PARTIES: Allen (Niece) v. Dalk (Half-sister) FACTS: Ms. Dalk‚ disputed the validity of a will claimed to be that of her half-sister‚ the decedent‚ McPeak. Decedent signed four originals of a living will‚ three originals of durable power of attorney‚ but failed to sign her will. PRIOR PROCEEDINGS: The lower courts determined that the will was invalid. ISSUE: Whether the will of the decedent McPeak was properly executed
Premium Law Common law Sign
ANGE CAROLINE………………………………………………..COMPLAINANT OTTO JOHN………………………..………………………………RESPONDENT MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING The complainant cohabited with the respondent for six years. This resulted into one issue; AYELLA NORBERT (13 Years).The complainant confirmed that they have been living happily. Last year in February‚ her parents picked her from her place and took her to stay with them so that the respondent settles other obligations as required culturally .And the respondent
Premium Defendant Legal terms Health care
Hannah David 11 February 2013 Business Law Rothing v. Kallestad Issues: 1) Whether the district court erred in concluding that hay is not a “product “for purposes of a strict liability in tort cause of action. 2) Whether the District Court erred in concluding that the Rothings negligence claim against Kallestad fails because it was unforeseeable that the hay could cause injury and death to the Rothings’ horses‚ thus no duty of care existed. 3) Whether the District Court erred in concluding that
Premium Tort Contract law Implied warranty
Justin Jethroe Ms. Allen Intro to Corrections April 12‚ 2013 Roper v. Simmons U. S. Supreme Court March 1‚ 2005 543 U.S. 551 Statement of Facts This case in Fenton‚ Missouri involves 17 yrs. old Christopher Simmons born in 1993. Charles Benjamin and John Tessmer were Christopher Simmons friends and accomplices. Christopher Simmons planned and committed a capital murder along with Charles Benjamin. The plan was to commit burglary and murder by breaking and entering‚ tying up Shirley
Premium Capital punishment Roper v. Simmons Crime
Wright v.Kehoe‚ 2010 ONSC 319(CanLII) Parties: David Kehoe and Total Credit Recovery Ltd. – Appellants Camille Wright – Respondent Date of Decision: January 12‚ 2010 Facts: On November 27‚ 2008‚ Camille Wright was awarded damages for slander and costs on a substantial indemnity basis in her lawsuit against David Kehoe and his employer Total Credit Recovery Ltd‚ a collection agency. In an effort to collect money owed from Ms. Wright for a leased car‚ which had been repossessed by the lessor
Premium Jury Law Tort