Preview

Mediation Brief

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
343 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Mediation Brief
ANGE CAROLINE………………………………………………..COMPLAINANT

OTTO JOHN………………………..………………………………RESPONDENT

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING

The complainant cohabited with the respondent for six years. This resulted into one issue; AYELLA NORBERT (13 Years).The complainant confirmed that they have been living happily. Last year in February, her parents picked her from her place and took her to stay with them so that the respondent settles other obligations as required culturally .And the respondent was conditioned to provide for; money for upkeep, medical care and school feeds. Of which he accepted to cater for.

However, this did not go down well with the respondent. He did not follow her immediately as the parents thought it would happen. The complainant complained that the respondent’s phone number could not be accessed most of the time she would wish to communicate with him. The respondent pointed out that where he works there is poor net work coverage that is why it has been happening that way.

The respondent complained that one time when he went to the in-Laws to present some grievances against her to be settled because the complainant threatened his life by saying his life would be shortened if he continues hurting her. That the accident I got was a minor one the serious one was yet to happen. they turned and said he was the one on the wrong because he pointed out all the bad behavior the complainant exhibited. And the father-in –law stopped the respondent never to cross his home and not to go and see his children.

BOTH PARTIES AGREED AS FOLLOWS;

The respondent agreed to continue providing for medical care, 100000 shs for upkeep on monthly basis and school fees.

The complainant agreed to allow the respondent to check on his children from home or from school.

The respondent accepted to be providing for the requirements for the school going child from time to time.

11/02/2010

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Case Brief

    • 7225 Words
    • 24 Pages

    Combined Source: Company Profiles and Directories;US Law Reviews and Journals, Combined;Federal & State Court Cases - After 1944, Combined;Newspaper Stories, Combined Papers…

    • 7225 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Caseworker Misi Case

    • 314 Words
    • 2 Pages

    This client was admitted around 1530hrs, policies and regulation within the shelter was given by Day Shift to this individual for her awareness and understanding while staying in the program. Caseworker Misi was here to assess this new case. Caseworker also asked us if we can pick up her belongings from her father in Malaeloa. Staff Maria asked the client if she can tell us her house location or her father’s contact numbers, for us to know where to pick up her stuff, but she didn’t answer it specifically to the question, all she said is that she misses her 1 year old baby. Maria asks her who is taking care of her baby. And she said that her boyfriend Fred is looking after her. Maria told her that we’re going to remove her baby and bring her…

    • 314 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    CASE Brief

    • 978 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Prior restrictions had been placed on Rodman’s conduct due to personal problems adversely impacting upon her place of work.…

    • 978 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Legal Brief

    • 671 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Mr. Potbelly holds a garage sale at his home. Mr. Slim Jim stops by the sale and upon noticing a rare piece of art pottery offers a price of $100 for the art that is marked $250. Mr. Potbelly accepts Mr. Slim Jim’s offer. Mr. Potbelly informs Mr. Slim Jim he is selling his home because he is moving up north because he has lost his job. Mr. Slim Jim asks how much he is selling it for and Mr. Potbelly informs him he is thinking $75,000. Mr. Slim Jim offers him $70,000 cash for the property which Mr. Potbelly immediately accepts the offer. Mr. Slim Jim informs Mr. Potbelly that he will be back in one hour with a cashiers’ check made payable to Mr. Potbelly. Mr. Potbelly says “Great!” and that while Mr. Slim Jim is getting the money that he will find a box in his basement for the pottery.…

    • 671 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Brief

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Joseph Kly met Walter and Helen Pestinikas in the latter part of 1981 when Kly consulted them about prearranging his funeral. In March, 1982, Kly, who had been living with a stepson, was hospitalized and diagnosed as suffering from Zenker's diverticulum, a weakness in the walls of the esophagus, [***4] which caused him to have trouble swallowing food. In the hospital, Kly was given food which he was able to swallow and, as a result, regained some of the [**1342] weight which he had lost. When he was about to be discharged, he expressed a desire not to return to his stepson's home and sent word to appellants that he wanted to speak with them. As a consequence, arrangements were made for appellants to care for Kly in their home on Main Street in Scranton, Lackawanna County.…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    FBLA

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Last week, an unidentified, well spoken, educated, and knowledgeable caller provided me with the following detailed information:…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The fourteen year old girl was not the legal owner or person responsible for the home, therefore permission from her was invalid. In addition, she did not…

    • 552 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Case Brief

    • 1199 Words
    • 5 Pages

    On the evening of January 5, 1993, Tracie Reeves and Molly Coffman, both twelve years of age and students at West Carroll Middle School, spoke on the telephone and decided to kill their homeroom teacher, Janice Geiger. They agreed that Coffman would bring rat poison to school the following days so that it could be placed in Geiger 's drink. After that , they would steal Geiger 's car and drive to the Smoky Mountains. On the morning of January 6, Coffman placed a packet of rat poison in her purse and board the school bus. Coffman told another student, Christy Hernandez, of the plan and show her the poison. Hernandez went and informed her homeroom teacher, Sherry Cockrill. Cockrill then informed the school principal, Claudia Argo. When Geiger entered her classroom that morning, she observed Reeves and Coffman leaning over her deck; and when the girls noticed her, they giggled and ran back to their seats. Geiger saw a purse lying next to her coffee cup on the top of the desk. Shortly after Argo called Coffman to the principal 's office, rat poison was found in Coffman 's purse. Both Reeves and Coffman gave written statement to the Sheriff investigator concerning their plan to poison Geiger and steal her car.…

    • 1199 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Case Brief

    • 607 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Plaintiffs argues recovery under the “reasonably Foreseeability” test, which would allow a Plaintiff outside the “Zone of Danger” to recover, which was adopted in Sinn v. Burd, 486 Pa. 146 (1979). The Court stated in response that the Plaintiff’s flexible interpretation of the “jurisprudential concept …which require[s] that the defendant’s breach of a duty of care proximately causes plaintiff’s injury,” was flawed. Moreover, that “at some point along the causal chain, the passage of time and the span of distance mandate a cut-off point for liability.” Id.…

    • 607 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    THIS CAUSE having come on to be heard before the Court upon the Wife’s Complaint for Divorce, and the Husband’s Counter Complaint for Divorce, and the Court having scheduled a Final Hearing for June 17, 2012, and the parties and their respective counsel having appeared before the Court on said date, and the parties having established residency during the Final Hearing, and the Court being otherwise fully advised the premises finds that:…

    • 1143 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    case brief

    • 258 Words
    • 2 Pages

    FACTS: In August of 2003 Detective Shane Blankenship, a social worker, was assigned to investigate and interview Michael Shatzer about claims that Shatzer had sexually abused his three year old son. At the time of the investigation Shatzer was incarcerated at Maryland Correctional Institution-Hagerstown for an unrelated child-sexual abuse offense. Before asking Shatzer any questions, Detective Blankenship informed Shatzer of his rights, Shatzer then obtained a written waiver of those rights. Blankenship proceeded to end the interview, release Shatzer back into the general prison population, and end the investigation. After two years and six months, Dectective Hoover reopened the investigation, interviewed Shatzer's son who was now eight years old, who could now describe the incident in more detail. In March of 2006, Hoover went to Roxbury Correctional Institute to interview Shatzer about sexually abusing his son. After approximately 30 minutes of interviewing, Shatzer agreed to take a polygraph; in which he failed. At no point during this second interview did Shatzer request to speak to a lawyer or refuse to answer Hoover's questions without a lawyer present. After incriminating himself, Shatzer was charged with second-degree sexual offense, sexual child abuse, second-degree assault and contributing to conditions rending a child in need of assistance. In court, Shatzer moved to suppress his March 2006 statements in regards to Edwards v. Arizona, 451 U.S. 477 (1981). The trail court denied his motion. The Court of Criminal Appeals of Maryland reversed the trail courts decision stating that release of Shatzer back into the general prison population did not constitute a break in custody.…

    • 258 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Currently, the parties in a divorce with minor children or in a paternity action (where matters of parental responsibility, i.e. custody and/or visitation, are being addressed) are required to attend an approved in-person parent and education and stabilization class. Florida Statute §61.21.…

    • 471 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Law Brief

    • 2094 Words
    • 9 Pages

    This civil court case takes place in a West Virginia school system located in Taylor County, when a general education high school history teacher failed to follow an IEP for Douglas Devart. During the case Devart and his parents Robert and Virginia ended up using aliases by the names of John Doe, Jane Doe and son D.D. Doe as a deterrent from the public so the family would not endure any additional embarrassment, slander, and/or liable regarding the son’s handicap. The defendants of this case were D.D.’s history teacher Michael Withers, Principal Greg Cartwright, Superintendent Wendell Teets and the Taylor County Board of Education. The following is a sequence of events that happened in chronological order that led up to the trial. Plaintiff D. D. was diagnosed as having a learning disability in the fourth grade while attending Anna Jarvis School in Taylor County. At that time he had been put on an Individual Educational Program (a.k.a. IEP) designed to accommodate his learning disability as required by Public Law 94-142 and implementing federal regulations, 34 C.F.R. 300.130 and implementing State Policy No. 2419, Section 1.3, 1.4 and 2.11, because of his learning disability D.D.’s educational program was adapted to provide oral testing by a learning disabilities teacher in a learning disabilities resource classroom. This accommodation was regularly provided at Anna Jarvis School and Grafton Middle School.…

    • 2094 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Brief

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages

    1. Applications for asylum may not be made against the wishes of a parent of a child that lacks the mental capacity to request asylum and a third party cannot speak on behalf of a minor because it is the right of a…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Social Work Law

    • 2613 Words
    • 11 Pages

    This essay will state the legal obligations and rights in relation to the case study focusing on Community Care Law, Mental Health issues, anti-discriminatory issues and will show linkages between the different laws and issues raised throughout the essay. This essay will also identify, define and apply these various laws and issues to the case study appropriately including what assistance can be sought for the family involved and various assessments that can be carried out.…

    • 2613 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays