"An outline of kant s foundations of metaphysics of morals" Essays and Research Papers

Sort By:
Satisfactory Essays
Good Essays
Better Essays
Powerful Essays
Best Essays
Page 11 of 50 - About 500 Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hume Vs Kant

    • 1828 Words
    • 8 Pages

    paper I will be contrasting the moral philosophies of David Hume and Immanuel Kant. Although I will be discussing several ideas from each philosopher the main theme of my paper will be dealing with the source of morality. It is my opinion that Hume’s sentiment based‚ empirical method is more practical than the reason based‚ a priori theory of Kant. According to Kant moral law must be known a priori‚ and must be able to be universally applied to all beings. Kant asserts that empirical explanations

    Premium Morality Philosophy Immanuel Kant

    • 1828 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Borodikhin Dmitriy ID: 20062471 group #3 Platonic and Aristotelian metaphysics Plato and Aristotle are the names of the two philosophers who had so much influence on philosophy as a science. Plato and Aristotle are connected with each other. At 17 years Aristotle entered the school of the Plato. From the beginning Aristotle was strongly on the side of Plato’s principles‚ and then his views became more differ from Plato. In Plato’s

    Free Aristotle Plato Theory of Forms

    • 1354 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Kant and Emerson

    • 2207 Words
    • 6 Pages

    agree In “Observations on the Feeling of the Beautiful and Sublime” section one by Immanuel Kant. Immanuel Kant begins with discussing the idea that feeling happy or sad does not come from the nature of external things but more of what a person’s ability to let things make them feel pleasure of pain. He stresses that all people are different. Something that may make someone feel upset can make another happy. Kant then continues to talk about the feeling of the sublime and beautiful. He uses examples

    Premium Aesthetics Immanuel Kant

    • 2207 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Kohlberg’s Moral Stages Theory An indepth explaination Josh Gallo March 24‚ 2015 Crim. 101-f Dr. Kenneth Minton How exactly do children develop morality? This question has fascinated parents‚ educators‚ religious leaders‚ and philosophers alike for decades. Does society and our surroundings dictate our moral development or do parental influences assume the majority role in which the way we develop our morality? Psychologist Lawrence Kohlberg is looked at as one of the staple theorists who developed

    Premium Kohlberg's stages of moral development Jean Piaget

    • 1433 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Immanuel Kant

    • 865 Words
    • 4 Pages

    obligations and agreements where in today’s modern era‚ he’s being taught about to students around the globe. But during the 18th century Hume wasn’t the only great thinker during that time that had theories concerning science and how it works. Immanuel Kant‚ a German philosopher also brought forth theories that were as impactful to the world as Hume’s were. To understand Hume’s view on the world‚ one must first understand how cause and effect works as its basic definition and then how Hume sees it.

    Premium Metaphysics Causality David Hume

    • 865 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Kant Vs Aristotle

    • 1774 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Despite several overlapping similarities between Aristotle and Kant on virtue ethics‚ there are fundamental differences between their view on the source of virtuous action. In this paper‚ I will argue‚ the underpinning behind each respectable view differs; as Aristotle believes virtuous action derives from choices lying in the mean whereas‚ Kant does not hold that virtuous action lies in the mean‚ but rather‚ holds they proceed from duty acting in accordance with universal principles. The fundamental

    Premium Virtue Ethics

    • 1774 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    HYPERLINK "http://www.philosophypages.com/ph/kant.htm" Immanuel Kant answers the question in the first sentence of the essay: “Enlightenment is man’s emergence from his self-incurred immaturity.” He argues that the immaturity is self-inflicted not from a lack of understanding‚ but from the lack of courage to use one’s reason‚ intellect‚ and wisdom without the guidance of another. He exclaims that the motto of enlightenment is “Sapere aude”! – Dare to be wise! The German word Unmündigkeit means not

    Premium Immanuel Kant Age of Enlightenment David Hume

    • 1986 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    German philosopher Immanuel Kant‚ father of the categorical imperative‚ seems to have found me in the right season of life. German philosopher‚ Immanuel Kant‚ is considered by many to be a central figure in modern philosophy due to his contributions made to ethics‚ epistemology‚ metaphysics and aesthetics. Arguably‚ his most notable contribution is fathering the categorical imperative‚ a command of reason not based upon the desires of any one person. Kant also comments on various topics including

    Premium Immanuel Kant Philosophy Categorical imperative

    • 1060 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Spelman Vs Kant

    • 1358 Words
    • 6 Pages

    When talking about philosophy‚ there are many different theories of ethics. Some philosophers believe different things‚ or they expand on previous philosophies. Two theories in particular are Immanuel Kant’s deontological theory. This deals with the categorical imperative‚ and Elizabeth Spelman’s theory which discusses the ethics of care‚ and the ethics of justice. Although these theories are separated by centuries‚ they complement each other. Both theories discuss how to make ethical decisions.

    Premium Immanuel Kant Morality Ethics

    • 1358 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    distinguish in todays society‚ however philosophy has took a much more intricate account of what morality is. Philosopher Immanuel Kant‚ in his Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals‚ and philosopher Thomas Hobbes‚ in his Leviathan‚ both have very different understandings on the basis of morality and the determination of what is “good”‚ “evil”‚ “right” or “wrong”. Kant believes that purely rational principles alone provide the basis for morality‚ whereas Hobbes establishes that human beings are self-interested

    Premium Morality Ethics Religion

    • 781 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
Page 1 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 50