LBJ Company: Internal Control Evaluation Accounting 504: Managerial Use & Analysis Case Study 2 Written by: 8/10/13 This evaluation is being presented as an assessment of the preparedness of the LJB Company to go public at a future date. By researching current regulations regarding publicly traded firms we hope to prepare for a smooth transition into the trading market. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX) has established the following guidelines
Premium Internal control Sarbanes–Oxley Act Security
Accounting 504 Case Study 2 Keller Graduate School of Management Prepared by: Samara Ellison Prepared for: Professor Hicks 3 April 2013 To: LJB Company President From: Samara Ellison‚ Accounting Firm Subject: Evaluation of LJB Company’s Internal Control Structures Date: 3 April 2013 Hello LJB Company President: First‚ I would like to thank you for hiring my accounting firm to evaluate LJB’s internal controls system. This report will inform you of any new internal control requirements
Premium Internal control
To: President of LJB Company‚ Thank you for selecting our firm to provide your company with an evaluation of your organizations internal control system. Internal control systems are vital in securing your organizations assets‚ it will limit the risk of fraud as well as misuse of your assets. Comprehending how to separate duties among your employees will aid in improving transparency as well as keep your company financially strong. Before the company decides to go public it is important to know
Premium Internal control
Question 1 2 out of 2 points | | | The cost concept is the basis for entering the exchange price into the accounting records.Answer | | | | | Selected Answer: | True | | | | | Question 2 2 out of 2 points | | | Allen Marks is the sole stockholder of Great Marks Company. As of the end of its accounting period‚ December 31‚ 2011‚ Great Marks Company has assets of $940‚000 and liabilities of $300‚000. During 2012‚ Allen Marks purchased an additional $65‚000 of capital
Premium Stock market Stock Finance
Case Study 2-Internal Controls 2014 ACCT 504 Table of Contents I) Introduction II) Internal Control Requirements-Sarbanes/Oxley Act III) Internal Controls-Strengths IV) Internal Controls-Opportunities for Improvement Introduction It has come to the attention of the president of LJB Company that an evaluation is needed to determine the reliability and level of compliance of the company’s
Premium Internal control Auditing Corporate governance
traded companies to maintain an adequate system of internal control. Under SOX Section 404‚ a company must report on internal controls over financial reporting in its annual report. Four key elements must be included in this report (Smith‚ Ledyard;): 1. Statement of responsibility by the company management (CEO and CFO) for establishing and maintaining an adequate internal control structure and procedure for financial reporting. 2. Statement identifying the framework used by management to evaluate
Premium Internal control Public company Receipt
Introduction Internal controls are vital to any company’s business and financial sustainability. Internal controls consist of measures taken by a company safeguarding against fraud‚ and theft. Internal controls ensure accuracy and reliability in accounting data‚ and secure policies within the organization. Further‚ internal controls evaluate all levels of performance. These are addressed with five principles of internal control: Establishment of responsibility‚ Segregation of duties‚ Documentation
Premium Internal control Sarbanes–Oxley Act
1. Question : (TCO A) Which of the following statements is CORRECT? Student Answer: One of the disadvantages of a sole proprietorship is that the proprietor is exposed to unlimited liability. It is generally easier to transfer one’s ownership interest in a partnership than in a corporation. One of the advantages of the corporate form of organization is that it avoids double taxation. One of the advantages of a corporation from a social standpoint is that every stockholder has
Premium Corporation Business law Types of business entity
7. 2.2 General Issue Process: (G.3.3‚ pg. 7-12‚ Par. 7.2‚ yellow highlight) a. Ops issuing crew: 1. Ensures correctness of document. 2. Offloading crew‚ if required‚ will be responsible for scanning assets from OIS location to OIS location. i. Ops ME is responsible for re-verifying accuracy of scan data information and if required‚ necessary corrections are made with the Ops crew. Corrections to NALC‚ quantities‚ NllN‚ lot and serial numbers are NOT authorized. Ops ME/ST is responsible for clearing
Premium Management Non-commissioned officer Officer
CGA-CANADA MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS 2 EXAMINATION June 2005 Marks 20 Time: 4 Hours Question 1 Select the best answer for each of the following unrelated items. Answer each of these items in your examination booklet by giving the number of your choice. For example‚ if the best answer for item (a) is (1)‚ write (a)(1) in your examination booklet. If more than one answer is given for an item‚ that item will not be marked. Incorrect answers will be marked as zero. Marks will not be awarded for
Premium Question Answer Interrogative word