Preview

TOK-science

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
400 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
TOK-science
TOK-SCIENCE
What is science?
-A body of knowledge
Natural sciences (physics, chemistry, biology) + human sciences
-A way of thinking
Science refers to a system of acquiring knowledge
This system uses observation and experimentation to describe and explain certain phenomena.

Observation: Science starts with the observable sense perception
Hypothesis: reason (sources)
Experiment: all WOKs
Results

Doctrine of science (NS)
All properties and events in the physical universe are governed by laws.
These laws a true at every time and place in the universe.
Assumes continuity of nature
Laws of gravity
Laws of thermodynamics
Laws of genetics
Difference that distinguish NS from HS to a large extent.
Distinguishable process in NS
The idea of testing these doctrines/theories (valuing skepticism)

Scientific inquiry cycle
Hypothesis (deduction)  prediction (observation)  test of prediction (induction)  hypothesis

The premise provides evidential support for the conclusion, but does not guaranteed its truth.
It is compatible with the premise that there is an unobserved black swan.

Problem of induction
Simple induction lead to absurd conclusions“sound right”
Validity of the arguments are loaded with many logical fallacies.

Occam’s razor
“When faced with competing hypothesis, select the one that makes the fewest/simplest assumptions.”

If there are more than one explanation are equal in proof, the one with the empirical evidence is best.
Of two explanations are equal, the simplest one is the best.
But, ‘simple’ is subjective.

What makes science ”Scientific”?
Look for empirical proof to confirm the idea  problem of induction  conformation bias
Induce confirmation Deduce falsification
Inductive logic  ideas
But they must be falsifiable in order to be scientific.
If we cannot objectively challenge an idea… it is not scientific… it is just an idea.

Central question in the philosophy of science distinguishing

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    “Science contributes moral as well as material blessings to the world. Its great moral contribution is objective, or the scientific point of view. The means doubting everything except facts; it means hewing to the facts, lets the chips fall where they may.” (163)…

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Check and Challenge

    • 274 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1. Evidence is important because it is the foundation of a scientific theory and explains…

    • 274 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1 06 workfile

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Scientific law cannot be experimentally disproved, Scientific theory is required to be challenged, to attempt to be disproven.…

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Scientific research can either be skeptical or…

    • 991 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A: The book states that in order for something to be considered scientific there must be some test or possible observation that could disprove it, if there is not a way to disprove it, and then it cannot be supported by science.…

    • 2184 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    According to Sir Karl Popper, science is an ‘open’ belief system. An open belief system is where every scientist’s theories are open to scrutiny, criticism and testing by others. For example everyone has access to scientific information and none is kept away from the public or other scientists. Popper believes that science is governed by the principle of falsificationism whereby scientists seek to falsify existing theories by deliberate experiments that might produce information which would contradict the current theories. In Popper’s views, the growth of our understanding of the world is based on the discarding of falsified claims. Scientific knowledge is built upon as new claims arise which would mean it’s cumulative. Science as a sustainable and sturdy belief system is questionable. Despite great achievements, it isn’t possible to take the current theories as unquestionably true. For example, for centuries it was believed the sun revolved around the earth however, Copernicus falsified this knowledge-claim.…

    • 1538 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Physics Quiz

    • 3581 Words
    • 15 Pages

    A scientific hypothesis may turn out to be right or it may turn out to be wrong. If it is a valid hypothesis, there must be a test for proving that it is…

    • 3581 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    tok chapter 1

    • 822 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Maps never accurately demonstrate the world scientifically. Instead, it serves as more of a perceived notion of territorial borders and power. Any given map is subject to bias in regards to detail and size depending on where it was created. A country with multiple islands and curvy topography essentially pay more attention to the detail and accuracy of that region, as opposed to an equally detailed country on the other side of the world. Nationalism incidentally causes any given country to assume, or even unconsciously, place their country at the center of their map, or even enlarge its size, due to the fact that they have so much pride and honor in possessing that particular nationality. It's not necessarily ignorance or lack of knowledge that causes this occurrence, but more of heightened focus on their own area.…

    • 822 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Who Killed The Iceman

    • 826 Words
    • 4 Pages

    When we do anything, it is influenced by our past and the people around us. This is the same case for scientific concepts and theories as we try to compare and test them against what we have learned before, even if neither of them is factual or heavily supported by most people. For example, when my family and I were visiting an apartment, the landlord kept talking about the benefits of Vitamin C, referencing a novel. Once we left the complex, my father told us that there weren’t as many advantages to Vitamin C as the landlord had told us. Both of the landlord and I depended on certain people to determine what is right and wrong, but are either of us correct? On one hand, my father has enough experience to make him credible, but he didn’t give…

    • 826 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    1. Before you read, decide which of three explanations for the extinction of the dinosaurs you like best. Write an explanation of why you like it.…

    • 3529 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    9/11 Research Paper

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages

    It will be shown that the statements and suggestions by NIST and “debunkers” in respect of…

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In order for the scientific method to answer the question it must be about something that you can…

    • 1133 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Scientific objectivity, according to Louise Antony and Thomas Kuhn, is fundamentally unattainable because of the human epistemological condition. The open-mindedness, or freedom from existing notions, that pervades almost all definitions of “objectivity” is inherently uncharacteristic of the human mind, and Antony explains that scientific reluctance to entertain new, controversial hypotheses is one manifestation of this innate mental road-block. When scientists view data that contradicts the central principles of their discipline, scientists react by questioning the data, not the principles. Antony argues, however, that adhering to accepted axioms, such as the idea that atoms are the fundamental constituents of all matter, enables scientific progress. Without the basic framework, or paradigm, that views atoms as the basic units of all chemical elements, chemistry would never have developed and, needless to say, advanced.…

    • 526 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Cause of Tut's Death

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages

    2) Identify one (1) of the theories and provide at least two (2) convincing reasons why the theory you have chosen is the best one to explain the mystery.…

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Scientific Method

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages

    * Conclusion: details the findings of the testing. What happened when you tested your theory?…

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics