Preview

Assess sociological explanations for science and ideology as a belief system

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1538 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Assess sociological explanations for science and ideology as a belief system
Assess sociological explanations for science and ideology as a belief system (33)
Hannah-Mae Neve 13D
Science has had an enormous impact on society over the last few centuries. The achievements in medicines have eradicated many fatal diseases; through which people have developed a large faith in science and so has become a strong belief system. However, it has been recognised that although science resolves many issues, it also creates problems. This contentious nature brought about a dimmed faith as science has created its own risks that increasingly threaten the planet such as global warming and nuclear weapons. Ideology is a worldview or a set of ideas and values. The main issues surround ideology as a belief system is that every set of beliefs is very one-sided. Each person only believes in their ideologies and is likely to be unwelcoming to any others. Consequently, friction and tension is built within society.
According to Sir Karl Popper, science is an ‘open’ belief system. An open belief system is where every scientist’s theories are open to scrutiny, criticism and testing by others. For example everyone has access to scientific information and none is kept away from the public or other scientists. Popper believes that science is governed by the principle of falsificationism whereby scientists seek to falsify existing theories by deliberate experiments that might produce information which would contradict the current theories. In Popper’s views, the growth of our understanding of the world is based on the discarding of falsified claims. Scientific knowledge is built upon as new claims arise which would mean it’s cumulative. Science as a sustainable and sturdy belief system is questionable. Despite great achievements, it isn’t possible to take the current theories as unquestionably true. For example, for centuries it was believed the sun revolved around the earth however, Copernicus falsified this knowledge-claim.
You can use science as a ‘closed’ belief

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    SCIE1000 Philosophy Essay

    • 1148 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Alan Chalmers, a British-Australian philosopher of science and best-selling author, suggests a common view of science by which scientific knowledge is ‘reliable’ and ‘objectively proven’ knowledge that is derived from facts of experience, experimental procedure and observations. This essay aims to discuss the problems that are likely to be highlighted by a Popperian hypothetico-deductivist when confronted with Chalmers’ adverse views on the validity of the scientific method. Both Alan Chalmers and Karl Popper - renowned for the development of hypothetico-deductivist/falsificationist account of science - represent the two major, contradictory theories (falsification and induction) regarding the functionality of science. I will be structuring my argument around these two models and the several complications surrounding the inductivist’s account of science that are seemingly solved by Popper’s alternative.…

    • 1148 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Science contributes moral as well as material blessings to the world. Its great moral contribution is objective, or the scientific point of view. The means doubting everything except facts; it means hewing to the facts, lets the chips fall where they may.” (163)…

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    An ideology is most commonly regarded as a set of ideas and values shared by a social group. Some people, for example Inclusivists, believe that there is little difference between scientific theories, religious doctrines and political ideologies. This is because an Inclusivist’s definition of religion is very broad. Anything which binds societies together or if groups have shared norms and values, it is considered a religion. This shows there is little difference between the concepts as it can be argued that all 3 bring societies or groups together due to shared norms and values. There are basic differences between the view of science and religion. The view of science is objective. Science believes in experiment and observation and teaches its followers that nothing is to be believed until scientific fact and evidence has been provided. Religion, on the other hand, teaches its followers to have faith in religious doctrines despite them having no evidence and is a very subjective concept. However there are similarities between all three concepts, as they are all socially constructed and they all help to make sense of the world. Another thing they all have in common is that there are certain groups/individuals that will benefit more than others. For example, from a Marxist perspective, the bourgeoisie (the ruling class) will benefit more from the capitalist system as they exploit the proletariat (the working class) by giving them a false consciousness. It could also be argued that people with higher power in politics benefit more from the ideologies as their opinions and ideas are more significant and have much more of an impact in society. Religious doctrines also provide authority figures such as priests and it can be argued that they benefit more from religion than others as, as well as gaining…

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    that is educating society on how to deal with and prevent any criminal activities. Fight…

    • 364 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    5. Compare and Contrast the political structures, new weapons, modes of transportation and methods of territorial expansion. (Egypt, Mesopotamia)…

    • 2663 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Throughout history the scientific and religious communities have fought to obtain dominance over the beliefs of the people.…

    • 964 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Belief Donald Lopez

    • 619 Words
    • 3 Pages

    These conclusions about ideology and belief go hand in hand. In most cases, a belief is held unconsciously, depending on how strong the belief is. Because of this, there cannot be a remotely accurate judgement on a belief through a simply play on words. Instead, in order to gain meaning and understanding of the belief and its use, there has to be an observation for its role in the everyday life of the one who holds that belief (Lopez 24).…

    • 619 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Firstly, research results can be complicated and generally confusing to a nonscientist, therefore the public must convey large amounts of trust in scientists. This aids contrarians in creating a credible counterargument and splitting the scientific consensus (Task #1). Most people have no scientific baseline from which to make informed opinions so they gather information from “experts” from both sides of a scientific story. Secondly, science in general is an objective project, scientists stress that their results are always falsifiable and that continued research is necessary to strengthen a scientific finding. For example, Roger Revelle started a talk to the AAAS about climate change by saying, “There is a good but by no means certain chance that the world’s average climate will become significantly warmer during the next century” (191). Contrarians used this ambiguous statement as a way to show that scientists are unsure of their work, when in fact there is no “certain chance” in any scientific trend. In order to remain trustworthy, scientists must always instill a sense of impartiality that is misconstrued as…

    • 1035 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    National Center for Mental Health Promotion and Youth Violence Prevention. (2010). Youth Courts. Retrieved from http://www.promoteprevent.org/publications/prevention-briefs/youth-courts…

    • 635 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Assess sociological explanations of the role of the mass media in creating moral panics about crime and deviance (21 marks)…

    • 953 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Science is reliable because it can change anytime something has been disproven. Once something has been disproven a scientits must formulate a new hypothesis and a new experiment to collect more data inorder to find more information. Some skeptics believe that science is not reliable because it changes so much but in fact that is what makes sciecne more credible. Science is reliable because it can change and doesn't just accept the "facts" and can ask new questions at any time. Allowing people to disprove scientific theories only strengthens science and provides the most up to date information on what has been observed, or the next theory of a new question that has been…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Weston Meehan

    • 3393 Words
    • 14 Pages

    Before the Evolutionary theory’s inception the four burning questions of man has been who am I, where did I come from, why am I here, and where do I go when I die? The answer to these questions has always been some sort of religion, and that this world has a designer with an incredible plan. Now as time has progressed a very dangerous solution was introduced to the world and with its arrival it is changing the very fabric of humanity. The new religion of the day is science and this affects our legal system, school system, and thought process. These effects over time can be detrimental to the minds and morals of us as a society.…

    • 3393 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    On one hand, science is defined by the value of the society which is directly related to the practical needs of the time. “For continuing survival of the human race it was believed that humans should become farmers and not explorers, thus using all possible resources for crops, not space exploration (“IMDb: FAQ for Interstellar (2014)”).” As is evident in Murph’s parent meeting, although science is still taught at school, the authority (not mentioned in the movie) selectively transmits science to the public through the control of knowledge. For example, the history books claim that the Apollo mission to the Moon were faked. In a word, only the science that fits in the social value are regarded as true science; other science are excluded from books and claimed to be fake.…

    • 2112 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    To start off Thomas Kuhn always thought that there were to types of science. “Normal Science” the easy one everybody in the world did every day. Here is what Thomas said in his book “Structure of Scientific Revulsions”; “Normal Science", that is to say every day, bread-and-butter science, is a "puzzle-solving" activity conducted under a reigning "paradigm”. An "anomaly" arises when a puzzle, considered as important or essential in some way, cannot be solved. The anomaly cannot be written off as just an ill-conceived research project; it continues to assert itself as a thorn in the side of the practicing scientists. The anomaly is a novelty that cannot be written off, and which cannot be solved.” This was all in the Kuhn’ Cycle and it the model was good that it navigated through the Industrial Revolution, two world wars, the Great Depression, the Cold War, and other world problems. Popper thought that justification worked throughout falsification, and never through verification, he obviously agreed that such propositions didn’t need to be proven in the sense of logical derivation. For that reason it is now common in science to use falsifiability as a criterion for dismissing theories or claims as parts of science. Popper 's own critique of Marx and Freud as falsifiable was a classic study, and the salutary influence of the principle in discussion of psychics or astrology is occasionally seen. This is how Thomas and Karl thought that science should be done.…

    • 592 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Despite the fact that Science has helped us, the advances of technology has increased the destructive capacity of conflict by enabling many countries to create horrifying weapons of mass destruction that have raised numerous ethical questions. Also, it is a constant threat to humanity with the danger that never ceases to end as can be seen by the destruction of the First and Second World War with their unprecedented number of deaths. The atomic bomb, for example, with the destruction it has caused and affected the Japanese many years after and, it was created about 70 years ago. In the 21st century, we have weapons that can make the atomic bomb look like a firecracker. The development of these weapons of mass destruction has raised the threat of total global destruction. Science has produced the means of more suffering in an almost infinite way, which surely outweighs the benefits towards healing and helping the sick and needy. As much as I would like to disagree, as long as these weapons exist; Science will always be a threat to humanity.…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays