II. Give a summary of the problem or issue in the article
The author started off with the statement”Now we’re told that Dr. Soledad Borromeo-Buehler’s book “The Cry of Balintawak” proves it did not happen the way it has always been written” another was “In this day and age of fakes, it is a tender mercy that we continue to celebrate what is real for us Filipinos: Our National Language, now honored..”. Clearly, one can infer that there were a lot of criticisms in our National Language, also known as our Pambansang Wika due to the development of language infused with contributions from all over the country. She also said that our language is continuously evolving and will forever be a work-in-progress. Criticisms such as knowing the tagalog language but not using it in the right way, context or even in our way of speaking; like for example the use of “nang” in different meanings. Our Pambansang Wika should be preserved and be used correctly without immaturity, idiocy and lack of willingness to learn.
III. Insights Gained from the article (links, connections to course, help understand/clarify)
In the case of this article, a lot has to do with both formal and informal education that we Filipinos have. In the informal education setting: to further explain is one example from the article “First held March 27 to April 2, in 1946 following President Sergio Osmea‘s orders the “Linggo ng Wika” was moved to Aug. 13-19 by president Ramon Magsaysay to honour Manuel L. Quezon’s birth month, as it was Quezon’s birth month, as it was Quezon’s Commonwealth Act 184 that establshied the institute of of National Language in 1936.” Second would be “..Tagalog-based wika was not so quickly the medium of instruction...” Then if we put this into the Formal Education as stated in the article “..Quezon went full steam ahead with his plans, dissolved the INL and replaced it with the National Language Institute to enable the teaching the pambansang wika nationwide, beginning...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document