Preview

A General Comparison between the Senate of Ancient Rome and the Senate of the United States

Best Essays
Open Document
Open Document
4122 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
A General Comparison between the Senate of Ancient Rome and the Senate of the United States
A General Comparison between the Senate of Ancient Rome and the Senate of the United States Research Class
16th August 2012

Outline
I. Introduction
Thesis statement: It is known to most that Western countries are on the rule of parliamentary democracy. We also know that Western countries inherited their political system from the ancient Greeks and Romans, especially the Roman political system. It has shaped western parliamentary system more than any others. However, different parliamentary systems have their specific characteristics. Has shaped from what it was in Ancient Rome to that we see today. This paper will compare and contrast the Ancient Roman Senate to today Modern American Senate.

II. The brief explanation of the Roman Senate
A. The Roman Senate
B. The brief history of the Senate
C. The lesson from the result of the Senate

III. The brief introduction of the Senate of the United States of the American
A. The Montesquieu’s political science and the United States
B. The brief history of the Senate
C. The present situation of the Senate

IV. The political similarity of the Senates
A. The function of the Senates
B. The filibusters and quorums
C. The political darkness of the Senates

V. The general difference between the Roman and United States Senates A. The membership of the Senates B. The political parties

VI. Conclusion

A General Comparison between the Senate of Ancient Rome and the Senate of the United States It is known to most that western countries are on the rule of parliamentary democracy. We also know that Western countries inherited their political system from the ancient Greeks and Romans, especially the Roman political system. It has shaped the western parliamentary system more than any others. However, different parliamentary systems and their specific characteristics have shaped Ancient Rome from what it was to



Cited: "..: Etrusia - Roman History :.." Etrusia. Web. 14 Aug. 2012. . Astin, A "Connexions Social Justice Encyclopedia." Persons Listed in Connexipedia: Connexipedia Connexions Encyclopedia of Social Justice. Web. 07 Aug. 2012. . "Constitution of the Roman Republic - Citizendia." Constitution of the Roman Republic - Citizendia "The Ethics of Human Rights (6): Human Rights and Maslowâs Hierarchy Of Needs." P.a.p.-Blog, Human Rights Etc.Web. 09 Aug. 2012. . "Filibuster." Dictionary.com Pearson, Monte. Perils of Empire the Roman Republic and the American Republic. New York: Algora Pub., 2008. Print. "Quorums." Dictionary.com "Visit the Roman and United States Senates." Visit the Roman and United States Senates. N.p., n.d. Web. 09 Aug. 2012. . Williams, David Lay

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    o “The Senate was regarded as the central institution of the Roman state” (Beard and Crawford).…

    • 1003 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Lendering, Jona, “The Senate”, Livius Articles on Ancient History (available from http://www.livius.org/se-sg/senate/senator.html, accessed on 7/02/2012)…

    • 1692 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sulla’s enlargement of the Senate has been a point of contention for a long time, with historians such as Syme arguing that the senate was increased to around 600 members, double its capacity. This is a very popular argument as Appian himself says how the senate was increased by 300 members, and with the usual membership at a normal time being 300, that would bring the total up to 600. It is theorised that Sulla also incorporated young men who did not have the political experience necessary and did not meet the minimum age of 30 years. Santangelo’s argument is that this was not a normal time in Roman history, and the senators may have only numbered 150 due to casualties sustained during the Civil War and proscriptions. Santangelo’s theory, as I stated, is that the Roman senate did not total 600 members during Sulla’s dictatorship.…

    • 473 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    At the end of their term, they were held accountable to the popular assembly for any decisions made. "Position open only to patricians, plebeians became eligible in 367 BCE and by 342 BCE legislation dictated that one of the two consuls had to be a plebeian"(Roman Government). The Senate had limited legislative jurisdiction; it's initially available only to the patricians, indirect exclusive power. It had no proper authority, and significant influence was continued, working for an advisory body to the representatives. Individuals of the conservative organization were voluntary and labored for life except finding guilty of…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    University of Notre Dame. (2007). The Fall of the Republic: the Reforms of Tiberius and Gaius. Retrieved February 23, 2013, from University of Notre Dame: http://ocw.nd.edu/classics/history-of-ancient-rome/eduCommons/classics/history-of-ancient-rome/lectures-1/the-fall-of-the-republic-part-1-the-reforms-of…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Summary: Soldier Of Rome

    • 869 Words
    • 4 Pages

    "The Late Republic." The Late Republic. N.p., 21 Nov. 2014. Web. 21 Nov. 2014. <http://www.roman-empire.net/republic/laterep-index.html>.…

    • 869 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    There are reasons why many of history’s greatest empires have tended to be either oligarchic or monarchial in nature. In observing the development of two of the ancient world’s most prominent models of representative government, the Athenian democracy and the Roman Republic, it can be concluded that when coupled with the political, economic, and social changes that come with expansion, the complications inherent with systems with democratic design prove incapable of running an empire.…

    • 1717 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In order to be recognised as a new and independent country, such nation must be able to determine what system of government should be used. If the new country will choose the democratic form of government, there are two systems to be chosen. These include parliamentary and the presidential system. The main goal of this paper is to determine the pros and cons of parliamentary and presidential system in a new country.…

    • 928 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Filibuster

    • 1382 Words
    • 6 Pages

    to Life Issues." Ending Filibuster Is Not a Good Idea ... N.p., n.d. Web. 09 Dec. 2012.…

    • 1382 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    When analyzing the United States in light of ancient Rome, there is an obvious juxtaposition which is unmistakable. The similarities between these two great civilizations are evident politically, militarily, and culturally. The political aspects of Ancient Rome and the modern United States are rooted in the concept of the republic. Militarily, both the U.S. and Ancient Rome have been considered superpowers of their time. Culturally, there are numerous comparisons that can be made between these two civilizations, in spite of numerous years that lapse between them.…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The spread of democracy was being seen in governments for the first time when adopted by Athens and Rome. In this essay I will compare the similarities and differences between the Ancient Greece and Roman forms of government. Explain how the structures of the government worked and how the society picked who was fit to hold office. Also in the terms of how the officials were picked, explain who were the people in the society who actually were able to vote. Lastly, this essay will explain what lead to the downfalls of these two great empires and who was responsible for this happening.…

    • 1197 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The majority of day-to-day aspects of the government during the republic were carried out by the senate. It controlled the money, details of foreign policy and the administration of Italy (Lintott, “The Constitution of the Roman Republic” 65). The Senate had no outlined legislative functions, but it advised the magistrates of the state. Resolutions made by the…

    • 2048 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The passage of new legislation is so notoriously difficult, and very few bills survive from the countless introduced in the United States Congress; Government in America: People, Politics, and Policy describes the passage of law in relation to the mere complexity of Congress’ structure as anything short of “remarkable” (Lineberry, Robert L., George C. Edwards III, and Martin P. Wattenberg). The illustration in the right conveys the trend of senatorial paralysis as a lawmaking institution, with the “record-low 2.8 percent of bills introduced in that chamber” and the “lowest output” of public laws since “at least World War II” (Marziani, Mimi Murray Digby, Jonathan Backer, and Diana Kasdan). While the filibuster was attractive as the poisoned…

    • 1627 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    To the political system is concerned, all western countries are a parliamentary democracy, a multiparty system and separation of powers system. However, the organizations in specific and different countries have their own characteristics, which are most representative of the U.S. presidential model, and the United Kingdom parliamentary cabinet system model. The two countries’ political systems are especially different in the constitution, the legislature, the executive, and the judicial.…

    • 1301 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Athenian Democracy remains a novel and captivating analysis in direct majority rules system where the general population doesn't choose delegates to vote for their sake yet vote on enactment and official bills in their own privilege. The Roman Republic was more represented…

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays