How Did The Senate Influence The Roman Government

The Roman Government consisted of Consuls and a Senate. Instead of having a king, the Romans chose consuls, two of them. The community elected neither of them but instead appointed by the popular assembly the Comitia Centuriata. Each consul serves one year, it's nonconsecutive, term, he could help a second or a third later. Consuls possessed supreme executive power, commanding the army, presiding over the Senate, the proposing legislation, but they could veto the others decision. At the end of their term, they were held accountable to the popular assembly for any decisions made. "Position open only to patricians, plebeians became eligible in 367 BCE and by 342 BCE legislation dictated that one of the two consuls had to be a plebeian"(Roman Government). The Senate had limited legislative jurisdiction; it's initially available only to the patricians, indirect exclusive power. It had no proper authority, and significant influence was continued, working for an advisory body to the representatives. Individuals of the conservative organization were voluntary and labored for life except finding guilty of
"Most famous monarchies were those on states of Macedonia and Epeiros" Spartan maintained a private association, it is recognized for the arrangement of two kings. Kings were held in line by ephors who were as well selected by the assembly. Kings were declared at a young age. Spartan kings could be placed on trial and also exiled. Tyrants were single runners of a state who had attained control in an undemocratic way. They were the contradiction of capitalism for Athenians; this made them felt they had the advantage. An Oligarchy is an order of political power managed by particular individuals. Any system which prohibited the authority from the whole citizen body and wasn't a tranny or a monarchy was an oligarchy. This was the well-known kind of city-state government and happened when the government went